바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

  • P-ISSN1013-0799
  • E-ISSN2586-2073
  • KCI

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.27 No.4

Citation Share

A Study on Preservation Metadata Elements for Research Information

Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management / Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, (P)1013-0799; (E)2586-2073
2010, v.27 no.4, pp.169-191
https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2010.27.4.169

(2010). A Study on Preservation Metadata Elements for Research Information. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 27(4), 169-191, https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2010.27.4.169

Abstract

This study aimed at developing preservation metadata elements and its applications for research information which is considered as a valuable digital resource these days. Specifically, the developed preservation metadata intends to provide a basis for the research information of the government-funded research institutes in economic and social science fields which are major knowledge producers of national policy. To ensure the interoperability of the research information across various departments and organizations, this study compared the elements from the CERIF(European Standard) and those from the PREMIS Data Dictionary which is based on OAIS reference model (ISO 14721). Based on this comparative analysis, this study developed complementary preservation metadata elements based on the two standards’ characteristics. Consequently, this study suggested a new preservation metadata elements and its applications that are compatible between the two systems and can be implemented in practice.

keywords
연구정보, 보존 메타데이터, 보존 메타데이터 요소, OAIS 참조모형, PREMIS 데이터 사전, CERIF(common european research information format), research information, preservation metadata, OAIS reference model(ISO 14721), PREMIS data dictionary

Reference

1.

교육과학기술부. (2009). 교육과학기술부 연구개발사업 성과관리업무 매뉴얼:교육과학기술부.

2.

서은경. (2005). 디지털자원의 보존 메타데이터 요소세트 개발에 관한 연구. 정보관리학회지, 22(3), 233-260.

3.

이지수. (2010). 국가 정책지식의 구조와 특성에 관한 연구. 정보관리연구, 41(2), 1-30.

4.

정정길. (1996). 정책결정론:대명출판사.

5.

최봉기. (1981). 政策情報의 機能과 價値評價. 한국행정학보, (15), 157-172.

6.

최상미. (2007). 현용전자기록물의 메타데이터 요소에 관한 연구. 한국기록관리학회지, 7(1), 39-60.

7.

홍현진. (2008). 정책정보통합서비스시스템 구축 모형에 관한 연구. 한국문헌정보학회지, 42(1), 95-125.

8.

Caplan, P.. (2009). Understanding PREMIS. http://www.loc.gov/standards/premis/understanding-premis.pdf.

9.

CCSDS. (2002). Reference Model for an Open Archival Information System(OAIS). BLUE BOOK.

10.

Day, Michael. (2003). Preservation Metadata Initiatives: Practicality, Sustainability, and Interoperability. http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/preservation/publications/erpanet-marburg/daypaper.pdf.

11.

Dye, T. R.. (1981). Understanding Public Policy, 5th ed:Prentice-Hall.

12.

euroCRIS. (2010). CERIF 2008 - 1.1 FDM: Model Introduction and Specification. http://www.eurocris.org/Uploads/Web%20pages/CERIF2008/CERIF2008_1.1_FDM.pdf.

13.

Graham, P. S.. (1994). Intellectual Preservation: Electronic Preservation of the Third Kind. http://www.clir.org/pubs/reports/graham/intpres.html.

14.

Hodge, G. M.. (2000). Best Practices for Digital Archiving: An Information Life Cycle Approach. D-Lib Megazine, 6(1), -.

15.

JISC. (2010). Research Information Management: Towards a common standard for exchanging research information. http://www.jisc.ac.uk/publications/briefingpapers/2010/bpexriv1.aspx#downloads.

16.

Lupovici, C. and J. Masanès. (2000). Metadata for the Long Term Preservation. http://nedlib.kb.nl/results/preservationmetadata.pdf.

17.

OCLC/RLG Working Group. (2002). Preservation Metadata and the OAIS Information Model: A Metadata Framework to Support the Preservation of Digital Objects. http://www.oclc.org/research/activities/past/orprojects/pmwg/pm_framework.pdf.

18.

PREMIS Working Group. (2005). Data Dictionary for Preservation Metadata: Final Report of the PREMIS Working Group. .

19.

PREMIS Editorial Committee. (2008). Data Dictionary for Preservation Metadata version 2.0. http://www.loc.gov/standards/premis/v2/premis-2-0.pdf.

20.

Rappaport, A.. (1982). Information for Decisionmaking: Quantitative and Behavioral Dimensions. 3rd ed:Prentice-Hall.

21.

Rogers, N., Lesly Huxley, and Nicky Ferguson. (2009). Exchanging Research Information in the UK. http://ie-repository.jisc.ac.uk/448/1/exri_final_v2.pdf.

22.

UKOLN. (2010). Research Information Management in the UK: CERIF and metadata alignment. http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/rim/dissemination/2010/rim-cerif.pdf.

Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management

e-Submission OA Policy