바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.28 No.3
Citation Share

A Study on Application of Resource Types of RDA to KCR4

Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management / Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, (P)1013-0799; (E)2586-2073
2011, v.28 no.3, pp.103-121
https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2011.28.3.103

(2011). A Study on Application of Resource Types of RDA to KCR4. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 28(3), 103-121, https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2011.28.3.103
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed
PDF Download

Abstract

This study is to seek to apply resource types of RDA to KCR4. It is difficult to choose appropriate term and to embody FRBR model because GMD of KCR4 is the mixture of content-based vocabularies and carrier-based vocabularies. SMD is to need to reflect the current technological terms. Resource type of RDA was already developed to overcome limitation of AACR2's GMD, and would affect the world cataloging environment, therefore it is need to apply resource type of RDA to Korean cataloging rule. For this study, case study and survey were used. In case study, it was to scan all GMD term for one university library to build by programming and to grape librarian and users’ potential need. In the survey by cataloging librarian, it was to figure out the current description of resource type in university library and to test RDA resource type. As a result, it was needed to revise the vocabulary to the obvious and user-understandable list. Also it was different in correction rate in RDA testing by resource type. Based on the case study and the survey, RDA resource type was applied to KCR4 resource list by adding term such as computer game in content type, and by inserting terms such as DVD, CD-ROM, Blu-Ray, computer file in carrier type. It also applied RDA description method and display means to KCR4. This study would apply RDA resource type to KCR4 and contribute to revise KCR4 resource type.

keywords
FRBR, RDA, AACR2, KCR4, content type, media type, carrier type, GMD, SMD, FRBR, RDA, AACR2, KCR4, content type, media type, carrier type, GMD, SMD, 서지레코드의 기능적요건, 자원기술과 접근, 영미목록규칙, 한국목록규칙, 내용유형, 매체유형, 용기유형, 자료유형, 특정자료종별

Reference

1.

이미화. (2011). KCR4 GMD 및 SMD 기술의 새로운 방안 모색. 한국도서관·정보학회지, 42(2), 237-255.

2.

한국도서관협회. (2003). 한국목록규칙:한국도서관협회.

3.

Chapman, A. (2006). RDA: A new international standard. Ariadne, 49(OCT. 2006). http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue49/chapman.

4.

Chung, H. H. (2001). User-friendly audiovisual material cataloging at Westchester County Public Library System. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 31(3), 313-325.

5.

Delsey, T. (1998). The Logical Structure of the Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules. http://www.rda-jsc.org/docs/aacr.pdf.

6.

Delsey, T. (2006). Categorization of Content and Carrier Terms in RDA. http://www.rda-jsc.org/docs/5rda-parta-categorization.pdf.

7.

Dunsire, G. (2007). Distinguishing content from carrier: the RDA/ONIX framework for resource categorization. D-Lib Magazine, 13(1), -.

8.

GMD/SMD Working Group. (2005). Content and Carrier Terms in RDA. http://opus.bath.ac.uk/17891.

9.

Green, R. (2007). Anticipating new media: A faceted classification of material types. In Proceedings North American Symposium on Knowledge Organization(Toronto: Ontario, 2007): 87-99. http://dlist.sir.arizona.edu/arizona/bitstream/10150/106475/1/63_Green.pdf.

10.

Guerrini, M. (2004). GMD: Its function and its history. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 38(2), 61-74.

11.

Hider, P. (2009). A Comparison between the RDA taxonomies and end-user categorizations of content and carrier. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 47(6), 544-560.

12.

Hider, P. (2009). Library resource categories and their possible groupings. Australian Academic & Research Libraries, 40(2), 105-115.

13.

JSC for Development of RDA. (2011). RDA: Resource Description and Access:ALA.

14.

JSC Format Variation Working Group. (2003). Joint Steering Committee for the Revision of AACR(JSC) Format Variation Working Group. http://www.loc.gov/marc/marbi/2003/2003-report01.html.

15.

Kiorgaard, D. (2006). RDA/ONIX Framework for Resource Categorization. www.loc.gov/marc/marbi/2007/5chair10.pdf.

16.

Seikel, M. (2011). How MARC has changed: the history of the format and its forthcoming relationship to RDA. Technical Services Quarterly, 28, 322-334.

17.

Tillett, B. (2001). General Material Designations (GMDs). http://www.rda-jsc.org/docs/gmd.pdf.

18.

Weihs, J. (2000). General Material Designations in the Twenty-first century. http://www.olacinc.org/drupal/capc_files/gmd.pdf.

19.

Weihs, J. (2008). Designating materials: from "germane terms" to element types. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 45(4), 3-24.

20.

Yee, M. M. (2007). FRBR and moving image materials: content versus carrier. In Understanding FRBR(CT: Libraries Unlimited,2007): 117-130. http://repositories.cdlib.org/postprints/2648.

21.

RDA Test Coordinating Committee. (2011). Report and Recommendations of the U.S. RDA Test Coordinating Committee. http://www.loc.gov/bibliographic-future/rda/rdatesting-finalreport-20june2011.pdf.

Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management

e-Submission OA Policy