바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

  • P-ISSN1013-0799
  • E-ISSN2586-2073
  • KCI

Usability Analysis of Structured Abstracts in Journal Articles for Document Clustering

Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management / Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, (P)1013-0799; (E)2586-2073
2012, v.29 no.1, pp.331-349
https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2012.29.1.331


Abstract

Structured abstracts have been regarded as an essential information factor to represent topics of journal articles. This study aims to provide an unconventional view to utilize structured abstracts with the analysis on sub fields of a structured abstract in depth. In this study, a structured abstract was segmented into four fields, namely, purpose, design, findings, and values/implications. Each field was compared in the performance analysis of document clustering. In result, the purpose statement of an abstract affected on the performance of journal article clustering more than any other fields. Furthermore, certain types of keywords were identified to be excluded in the document clustering to improve clustering performance, especially by Within group average clustering method. These keywords had stronger relationship to a specific abstract field such as research design than the topic of an article.

keywords
구조적 초록, 학술지 초록, 문서 클러스터링, 클러스터링 자질, 클러스터링 기법, structured abstract, journal abstract, document clustering, clustering feature, clustering method, structured abstract, journal abstract, document clustering, clustering feature, clustering method

Reference

1.

고영만. (2011). 연구문헌의 지식구조를 반영하는 의미기반의 지식조직체계에 관한 연구. 정보관리학회지, 28(1), 145-170.

2.

윤보현. (2011). 개체명 기반 웹 문서 클러스터링에서 자질 조합 분석. 한국정보기술학회논문지, 9(3), 199-206.

3.

이재윤. (2001). 클러스터링 성능 평가를 위한 비편향적 척도의 개발 (167-172). 한국정보관리학회.

4.

조현양. (2004). 계층적 결합형 문서 클러스터링 시스템과 복합명사 색인방법과의 연관관계 연구. 한국문헌정보학회지, 38(4), 179-192.

5.

Chen, C.. (2010). An integration of WordNet and fuzzy association rule mining for multi-label document clustering. Data & Knowledge Engineering, 69(11), 1208-1226. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.datak.2010.08.003.

6.

최상희. (2010). Document Clustering Using Reference Titles. 정보관리학회지, 27(2), 241-252.

7.

Hahs-Vaughn, D. L.. (2009). Quality of abstracts in articles submitted to a scholarly journal : A mixed methods case study of the journal Research in the Schools. Library & Information Science Research, 32(1), 53-61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2009.08.004.

8.

Hartley, J.. (1997). Is it appropriate to use structured abstracts in social science journals?. Learned Publishing, 10(4), 313-317.

9.

Hartley, J.. (1998). Is it appropriate to use structured abstracts in non-medical science journals?. Journal of Information Science, 24(5), 359-364.

10.

Hartley, J.. (1999). Applying ergonomics to Applied Ergonomics. Applied Ergonomics, 30(6), 535-541.

11.

Hartley, J.. (2000). Clarifying the abstracts of systematic reviews. Bulletin of the Medical Library Association, 88(4), 332-337.

12.

Hartley, J.. (2003). Improving the clarity of journal abstracts in psychology. Science Communication, 24(3), 366-379.

13.

Nakayama, T. (2005). Adoption of structured abstracts by general medical journals and format for a structured abstract. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 93(2), 237-242.

14.

Sharma, S.. (2006). Structured abstracts: Do they improve the quality of information in abstracts?. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 130(4), 523-530.

15.

Stevenson, H. A.. (2009). Structured abstracts: Do they improve citation retrieval from dental journals?. Journal of Orthodontics, 36(1), 52-60.

16.

Zhu, S.. (2009). Field independent probabilistic model for clustering multi-field documents. Information Processing and Management, 45(5), 555-570. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016./j.jpm.2009.03.005.

Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management