바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.31 No.1
Citation Share

A Study on Improving Access & Retrieval System of the National Library of Korea Subject Headings

Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management / Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, (P)1013-0799; (E)2586-2073
2014, v.31 no.1, pp.31-51
https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2014.31.1.031


& (2014). A Study on Improving Access & Retrieval System of the National Library of Korea Subject Headings. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 31(1), 31-51, https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2014.31.1.031
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed
PDF Download

Abstract

This study aims to suggest several improvement strategies for the access and retrieval system of National Library of Korea Subject Headings (NLKSH). For this purpose, first of all, the access and retrieval systems in five selected subject headings were examined. Second, focus group interviews and system analysis were conducted to reveal the current condition and suggest the future development strategies. Third, IFLA’s Guidelines for Subject Access in National Bibliographies and FAST application cases were analyzed to suggest implications on the improvement strategies. Upon these analysis, recommendations for improving access and retrieval systems of the NLKSH were proposed in four areas as follows: functionalities, interfaces, queries, and other front-end features.

keywords
주제명표목, 국립중앙도서관, 주제 접근, 주제 검색, subject heading, National Library of Korea, subject access, subject retrieval

Reference

1.

국립중앙도서관. (2002). 국립중앙도서관 주제명표목표 개발 최종보고서. 국립중앙도서관.

2.

국립중앙도서관. (2013). 국립중앙도서관 주제명표목표 개방을 위한 고품질화 연구:국립중앙도서관.

3.

박지영. (2010). 시소러스를 연계한 문학류 패싯 분류체계 개발. 한국비블리아학회지, 21(3), 77-89.

4.

박지영. (2011). 서지레코드의 주제전거를 위한 FRSAD 모형 연구. Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice, 42(1), 113-135. http://dx.doi.org/10.1633/JIM.2011.42.1.113.

5.

Anderson, J.. (2006). A fully faceted syntax for Library of Congress Subject Headings. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 43(1), 7-38.

6.

Chan, L. M.. (2010). FAST, Faceted Application of Subject Terminology: Principles and applications:Libraries Unlimited.

7.

Dean, R. J.. (2004). FAST: Development of simplified headings for metadata. Cataloging &Classification Quarterly, 39(1-2), 331-352.

8.

Fischer, K. S.. (2005). Critical views of LCSH, 1990-2001 : The third bibliographic essay. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 41(1), 63-109.

9.

(2013). GETAssoc Homepage. http://getassoc.cs.nii.ac.jp/.

10.

Guo, J.. (2011). Subject headings and subject search : A comparative study. Chinese Librarianship : An International Electronic Journal, 31, 1-17.

11.

Jahns, Y.. (2012). Guidelines for subject access in national bibliographies. IFLA Series on Bibliographic Control 45:De Gruyter Saur.

12.

Jin, Q.. (2008). Is FAST the right direction for a new system of subject cataloging and metadata?. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 45(3), 91-10.

13.

Julien, C.. (2012). Capitalizing on information organization and information visualization for a new-generation catalogue. Library Trends, 61, 148-161.

14.

Karen, M. D.. (1999). Do librarians understand the subject headings in library catalogs?. Reference & User Services Quarterly, 38(4), 369-387.

15.

Mixter, J.. (2013). FAST (Faceted Application of Subject Terminology) users summary and case studies. http://oclc.org/content/dam/research/publications/library/2013/2013-04.pdf.

16.

Walsh, J.. (2011). The use of Library of Congress Subject Headings in digital collections. Library Review, 60(4), 328-343.

17.

Yi, K.. (2010). Revisiting the syntactical and structural analysis of Library of Congress Subject Headings for the digital environment. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61, 677-687.

Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management

e-Submission OA Policy