바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.32 No.4
Citation Share

Identifying the Research Fronts in Korean Library and Information Science by Document Co-citation Analysis

Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management / Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, (P)1013-0799; (E)2586-2073
2015, v.32 no.4, pp.77-106
https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2015.32.4.077

(2015). Identifying the Research Fronts in Korean Library and Information Science by Document Co-citation Analysis. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 32(4), 77-106, https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2015.32.4.077
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed
PDF Download

Abstract

By document co-citation analysis with Korean Citation Index (KCI) data, this study accurately identified the research fronts and hot topics in Korean library and information science (LIS) from 2004 to 2013. 159 core papers in LIS domain and their citations are scraped manually from Korean Citation Index web site. In the cluster analysis and network analysis, 159 core papers were grouped into 27 clusters with multiple papers and 8 singlton clusters. Among the 27 clusters which have multple papers, ‘LIS education’ cluster was the largest with 16 core papers, and ‘citation analysis & intellectual structure analysis’ cluster had the strongest citation impact according to the ehs-index. Closer observation of the citations to the core papers in each research front showed that 67.5% of the citations were made by LIS research papers and 32.5% of the citations were made by non-LIS research papers. Considering the share of citations and the citation impact growth index, ‘local documentation’, ‘citation analysis & intellectual structure analysis’, and ‘research trends analysis’ were identified as the most emerging research front in Korean library and information science. The analytical methods used in this study have great potential in discovering the characteristics of research fronts in Korean interdisciplinary research domains.

keywords
document co-citation, research fronts, research trends, library and information science, co-citation network, citation impact, 문헌동시인용, 연구 전선, 연구동향, 문헌정보학, 동시인용 네트워크, 인용 영향력

Reference

1.

김영진. (1986). 논문의 동시인용을 통한 지적구조의 규명에 관한 연구. 정보관리학회지, 3(1), 103-135.

2.

박자현. (2013). 토픽모델링을 활용한 국내 문헌정보학 연구동향 분석. 정보관리학회지, 30(1), 7-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2013.30.1.007.

3.

박지연. (2013). 저자서지결합분석에 의한 문헌정보학의 지적구조 분석에 관한 연구. 정보관리학회지, 30(4), 31-59. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2013.30.4.031.

4.

사공철. (2001). 정보학사전:문헌정보처리연구회.

5.

안민호. (2006). 논문 동시인용 유형으로 본 커뮤니케이션 이론의 연결망 분석 : '한국언론학보', JOC, HCR의 실증연구를 중심으로. 한국언론학보, 50(1), 163-190.

6.

오세훈. (2005). 우리나라 문헌정보학 학술지 논문 및 인용문헌 분석을 통한 연구동향 연구. 정보관리학회지, 22(3), 379-408.

7.

유영준. (2003). 문헌정보학의 지식 구조에 관한 연구. 정보관리학회지, 20(3), 277-297.

8.

이재윤. (2006). 연구성과 측정을 위한 h-지수의 개량에 관한 연구. 정보관리학회지, 23(3), 167-186.

9.

이재윤. (2008). 서지적 저자결합분석 - 연구동향 분석을 위한 새로운 접근 -. 정보관리학회지, 25(1), 173-190.

10.

이재윤. (2011). 인용 네트워크 분석에 근거한 문헌 인용 지수 연구. 한국문헌정보학회지, 45(2), 119-143.

11.

이재윤. (2011). 계량서지적 기법을 활용한 LED 핵심 주제영역의 연구 동향 분석. Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice, 42(3), 1-26.

12.

이정환. (2013). 동시인용분석 기반 지식영역 가시화 기법을 활용한 증강현실 연구 분석. 한국CDE학회 논문집, 18(5), 309-320. http://dx.doi.org/10.7315/CADCAM.2013.309.

13.

조재인. (2011). 네트워크 텍스트 분석을 통한 문헌정보학 최근 연구 경향 분석. 정보관리학회지, 28(4), 65-83.

14.

Blei, D. M.. (2012). Probabilistic topic models. Communications of the ACM, 55(4), 77-84.

15.

Braam, R. R.. (1991). Mapping of science by combined co-citation and word analysis. I: Structural aspects. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 42(4), 233-251.

16.

Callon, M.. (1991). Co-word analysis as a tool for describing the network of interactions between basic and technological research: The case of polymer chemsitry. Scientometrics, 22(1), 155-205.

17.

Chen, C.. (2003). Mapping scientific frontiers: The quest for knowledge visualization:Springer-Verlag.

18.

De Solla Price, D. J.. (1965). Networks of scientific papers. Science, 149, 510-515.

19.

Garfield, E.. (1994). Research fronts. Current Contents, 41, 3-7.

20.

Porter, A. L.. (2005). Tech mining: Exploiting new technologies for competitive advantage:John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

21.

Rousseau, R.. (2010). An outgrow index. Annals of Library and Information Studies, 57(3), 287-290.

22.

Schubert, A.. (2009). Using the h-index for assessing single publications. Scientometrics, 78(3), 559-565.

23.

Small, H. G.. (1973). Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between publications. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24(4), 265-269.

24.

유소영. (2012). Curve Estimation among Citation and Centrality Measures in Article-level Citation Networks. 정보관리학회지, 29(2), 193-204. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2012.29.2.193.

25.

Zhao, D.. (2008). Evolution of research activities and intellectual influences in information science 1996-2005: Introducing author bibliographiccoupling analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(13), 2070-2086.

Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management

e-Submission OA Policy