바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
사전등록 바로가기
 

logo

  • P-ISSN1013-0799
  • E-ISSN2586-2073
  • KCI

논문 상세

이전 다음
논문 투고

Vol.33 No.3

Citation Share

의사의 임상질문 해결을 위한 온라인 정보검색과정 연구

An Analysis of Physicians' Online Information Search Process at the Point of Care

정보관리학회지 / Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, (P)1013-0799; (E)2586-2073
2016, v.33 no.3, pp.177-193
https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2016.33.3.177
김순 (이화여자대학교)
정은경 (이화여자대학교)
김순, & 정은경. (2016). 의사의 임상질문 해결을 위한 온라인 정보검색과정 연구. 정보관리학회지, 33(3), 177-193, https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2016.33.3.177

초록

본 논문은 임상의사가 환자치료 시 발생하는 문제를 해결하기 위해 온라인상에서 정보검색하는 과정을 연구하였다. 이를 위해 국내 대학병원 내과 전문의 10명을 대상으로 관찰조사와 심층면담을 수행하였다. Wilson의 문제 해결 모형을 기반으로 임상의사가 임상질문 해결을 위해 온라인상에서 검색하는 단계별 특성과 정보검색의 효용성에 대해 분석하였다. 그 결과, 임상의사는 사전 배경지식을 바탕으로 즉각적인 임상질문을 구성하지만, 실제 검색에서는 대부분 기본 검색전략만 사용하였으며, 본인에게 익숙한 특정 정보원만을 선호하였다. 하지만, 온라인 정보검색 평균 만족도는 7점 리커트 스케일 기준 5.7로 높게 나타났으며, 정보검색 후에 문제해결지수가 상승하였다. 임상의사는 잘 정리된 근거 중심의 신뢰성 높은 정보를 빠르고 쉽게 이용하기를 원하기 때문에 환자 진료시스템에서 바로 치료에 필요한 정보를 보여줄 수 있는 검색시스템의 연계가 필요함을 알 수 있다. 또한, 구글이나 PubMed 외에 다른 온라인 정보원에 대한 인지도는 현격히 낮게 나타나 다른 정보원에 대한 적극적인 홍보와 정보활용교육의 활성화도 필요함을 알 수 있다.

keywords
의사, 문제해결, 임상질문, 정보검색과정, 정보검색, 정보탐색, 임상정보원, 데이터베이스, physician, clinician, problem solving, clinical questions, information search process, information seeking, clinical information resources, database

Abstract

This study aims to analyze physicians’ online information search process to solve the clinical questions at the point of care. To achieve this purpose, ten university hospital-based physicians participated in-depth interviews and observation studies. Based on Wilson’s problem solving process, this study analyzed the characteristics of each information search stage and efficiency of online searching. The results showed that participants tend to relatively immediately formulate their clinical questions. However, basic searching strategies were only used and a few preferred information sources were chosen. However, average satisfaction degree of online searching appeared high with 5.7 (7 Likert-scale) and problem-solving index increased after searching. As physicians are likely to use well organized and evidenced-based credible information easily, it implies the needs for an integrated search system within the electronic medical record (EMR). In addition, as other online resources’ awareness is lower comparing Google and PubMed, active promotions and training of other resources are needed.

keywords
의사, 문제해결, 임상질문, 정보검색과정, 정보검색, 정보탐색, 임상정보원, 데이터베이스, physician, clinician, problem solving, clinical questions, information search process, information seeking, clinical information resources, database

참고문헌

1.

김나원. (2009). 의사들의 의료정보추구행태에 관한 탐구. 정보관리학회지, 26(3), 435-449.

2.

박진영. (2012). 근거중심의학(EBM) 정보서비스 도입을 위한 연구 : 임상 전공의의 정보이용행태와 EBM에 대한 인식을 바탕으로.

3.

홍기선. (2008). 의사들의 정보요구 및 이용행태에 관한 연구. 한국도서관·정보학회지, 39(1), 33-50.

4.

Davidoff, F.. (2011). Delivering clinical evidence where it's needed: Building an information system worthy of the profession. Journal of the American Medical Association, 305(18), 1906-1907. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.2011.619.

5.

Davies, K.. (2011). Information needs and barriers to accessing electronic information: Hospitalbased physicians compared to primary care physicians. Journal of Hospital Librarianship, 11(3), 249-260. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15323269.2011.587103.

6.

De Groote, S. L.. (2005). Online journals' impact on the citation patterns of medical faculty. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 93(2), 223-228.

7.

Del Fiol, G.. (2014). Clinical questions raised by physicians at the point of care: A systematic review. JAMA Internal Medicine, 174(5), 710-718. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.368.

8.

Ely, J. W.. (2005). Answering physicians' clinical questions: Obstacles and potential solutions. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 12(2), 217-224. http://dx.doi.org/10.1197/jamia.m1608.

9.

Ely, J. W.. (2007). Patient-care questions that physicians are unable to answer. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 14(4), 407-414. http://dx.doi.org/10.1197/jamia.m2398.

10.

Grad, R.. (2011). Physicians' assessment of the value of clinical information: Operationalization of a theoretical model. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(10), 1884-1891. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.21590.

11.

Hughes, B.. (2010). Doctors' online information needs, cognitive search strategies, and judgments of information quality and cognitive authority: How predictive judgments introduce bias into cognitive search models. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(3), 433-452. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.21245.

12.

Kuhlthau, C. C.. (1991). Inside the search process : Information seeking from the user's perspective. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 42(5), 361-371.

13.

Landry, C. F.. (2006). Work roles, tasks, and the information behavior of dentists. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 57(14), 1806-1908. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.20385.

14.

Macedo-Rouet, M.. (2012). How do scientists select articles in the PubMed database? An empirical study of criteria and strategies. European Review of Applied Psychology, 62(2), 63-72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.erap.2012.01.003.

15.

Schamber, L.. (1991). Users' criteria for evaluation in a multimedia environment. Proceedings of the ASIS Annual Meeting, 28, 126-133.

16.

Spink, A.. (1996). Multiple search sessions model of end-user behavior : An exploratory study. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 47(8), 603-609.

17.

Vakkari, P.. (2000). Relevance and contributing information types of searched documents in task performance (2-9). Proceedings of the 23rd Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. ACM.

18.

Vakkari, P.. (2001). A theory of the task-based information retrieval process: A summary and generalisation of a longitudinal study. Journal of Documentation, 57(1), 44-60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/eum0000000007075.

19.

Vibert N.. (2009). Effects of domain knowledge on reference search with the PubMed database : An experimental study. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(7), 1423-1447. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.21078.

20.

Westbrook, J. I.. (2005). Use of point-of-care online clinical evidence by junior and senior doctors in New South Wales public hospitals. Internal Medicine Journal, 35(7), 399-404. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1445-5994.2005.00836.x.

21.

Wilson, T. D.. (1999). Models in information behaviour research. Journal of Documentation, 55(3), 249-270.

정보관리학회지

논문 투고 OA 정책