This study analyzed changes to copyright policies in KCI journals comparatively using the previous 2 research results published in 2008 and 2016 and then gave insight into the meaning of the changes. The results of the study are as follows: Journals making the subject of copyright public had increased from 34% in 2008 to 67% in 2016. Journals transferring copyright from authors remained almost the same, with only a slight increase from 90% to 91% in the same period. Journals using the term ‘publication rights’ instead of ‘copyright’ had decreased; on the other hand, journals using the term ‘reproduction right’ and ‘right of transmission’ had increased. Use of copyright transfer agreement had increased from 25% to 50%; on the other hand, self archiving policy remained almost the same, decreasing slightly from 13% to 12%. This study argues that these changes mean the establishment of copyright industrialization for Korean journals and that the publishing bodies appear to be the most powerful main agent among stakeholders participating in scholarly publishing in this process.
김규환. (2017). 국내 학술지 오픈액세스 정책 현황 분석: 이용자 접근과 재사용 권리를 중심으로. 한국문헌정보학회지, , -.
이재민. (2006). 오픈 액세스를 위한 학술논문의 저작권 귀속현황과 개선 방안.
정경희. (2011). 국내 오픈액세스 학술지 특성에 관한 연구 - KCI 등재지를 중심으로 -. 한국비블리아학회지, 22(3), 373-391.
정경희. (2016). 국내 학술지의 저작권 관리 특성 분석. 정보관리학회지, 33(4), 269-291. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2016.33.4.269.
조경식. (2014). 새로운 매체 환경에서 저자와 저작권의 논쟁. 유럽사회문화, (13), 107-133.
최윤형. (2013). 국내 학술지 논문의 저작권 귀속 방안에 대한 연구.
홍재현. (2008). 국내 학술지 논문의 오픈 액세스와 아카이빙을 위한 저작권 귀속 연구: 한국학술진흥재단 등재 학술지를 중심으로. 한국도서관·정보학회지, 39(1), 431-463.
Anita Coleman. (2007). Self-archiving and the Copyright Transfer Agreements of ISI-ranked library and information science journals. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(2), 286-296. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.20494.
Patricia H. Dawson. (2016). Institutional Repositories, Open Access and Copyright: What Are the Practices and Implications?. Science & Technology Libraries, 35(4), 279-294. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0194262x.2016.1224994.
E. Gadd. (2016). What does green open access mean? Tracking twelve years of changes to journal publisher self-archiving policies. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, , -. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0961000616657406.
Georgia HARPER. (2009). OA and IP: open access, digital copyright and marketplace competition. Learned Publishing, 22(4), 283-288. http://dx.doi.org/10.1087/20090404.
Mikael Laakso. (2014). Green open access policies of scholarly journal publishers: a study of what, when, and where self-archiving is allowed. Scientometrics, 99(2), 475-494. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1205-3.
Remedios Melero. (2017). Openness of Spanish scholarly journals as measured by access and rights. Learned Publishing, 30(2), 143-155. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/leap.1095.
R. Melero. (2014). Journal author rights and self-archiving: the case of Spanish journals. Learned Publishing, 27(2), 107-120. http://dx.doi.org/10.1087/20140205.
Page, G.. (1996). Journal publishing: Principles and practice:Butterworths.
Ramello, G.. (2010). Copyright & endogenous market structure: A glimpse from the journalpublishing market. Review of Economic Research on Copyright Issues, 7(1), 7-29.
Visser, D.. (2015). The open access provision in Dutch copyright contract law. Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 10(11), 872-878. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpv161.