This study examined two characteristics of library and information science (LIS) journals in Korea through analysis of journal coupling with common authors. This study also illustrated the trend of Korean LIS research in the recent decade. The notable change is that record management and archival studies settle in LIS domain as a major research area. We introduced two indicators, Publishing Preference Index (PPI) and Researcher Attraction Index (RAI), based on the degree of common authors among journals. Both indicators revealed notable changes in author coupling, including reversal of PPIs in some journals, which can be interpreted as proof of changes in their author groups. The RAI analysis, which measured the degree of journals’ attractiveness to Korean LIS researchers and author sharing between two journals, illustrated the journals’ states in a domain; this result can help find both an isolated journal and strongly bonded journals in the specific domain. Journal coupling with common authors introduced in this study proved to be an effective investigative method for illustrating journals’ states in a specified domain as well as a multidisciplinary area.
최예진. (2016). 동시출현단어 분석에 기반한 메타데이터 분야의 지적구조에 관한 연구. 정보관리학회지, 33(3), 63-83. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2016.33.3.063.
Tove Faber Frandsen. (2008). Intradisciplinary differences in database coverage and the consequences for bibliometric research. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(10), 1570-1581. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.20817.
Stephen P. Harter. (1992). Information science and scientists: JASIS, 1972-1990. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 43(9), 583-593. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-4571(199210)43:9<583::aid-asi1>3.0.co;2-o.
Shaoyi He. (2002). A comparison of foreign authorship distribution in JASIST and the Journal of Documentation. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(11), 953-959. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.10131.
Kalervo Järvelin. (1993). The evolution of library and information science 1965–1985: A content analysis of journal articles. Information Processing & Management, 29(1), 129-144. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0306-4573(93)90028-C.
진설아. (2016). 토픽 모델링 기반 정보학 분야 학술지의 학제성 측정 연구. 정보관리학회지, 33(1), 7-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2016.33.1.007.
김홍렬. (2015). 국내 문헌정보학분야 학술지의 상호인용관계 분석. 정보관리학회지, 32(4), 7-27. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2015.32.4.007.
김판준. (2015). 디지털 큐레이션 연구동향 분석과 과제: 문헌정보학 분야를 중심으로. 정보관리학회지, 32(1), 265-295. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2015.32.1.265.
김판준. (2015). 국외 독서 및 독서교육 연구동향 분석: 문헌정보학 분야를 중심으로. 정보관리학회지, 32(3), 69-97. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2015.32.3.069.
이재윤. (2015). 문헌동시인용 분석을 통한 한국 문헌정보학의 연구 전선 파악. 정보관리학회지, 32(4), 77-106. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2015.32.4.077.
이재윤. (2016). 공저자 수를 고려한 공저 네트워크 중심성과 연구성과의 연관성 분석. 정보관리학회지, 33(4), 175-199. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2016.33.4.175.
이기헌. (2015). 문헌정보학 분야 핵심 학술지들의 가중 주제 - 방법 네트워크 분석. 한국문헌정보학회지, 49(3), 457-488. http://dx.doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2015.49.3.457.
이용구. (2015). 대만 문헌정보학 분야의 공저 네트워크 분석 연구. 정보관리학회지, 32(2), 167-192. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2015.32.2.167.
Chaoqun Ni. (2013). Venue-author-coupling: A measure for identifying disciplines through author communities. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(2), 265-279. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.22630.
Barbara Norelli. (2013). Collaborative Scholarship in Academic Library Literature: Who, What, and When. College & Undergraduate Libraries, 20(2), 173-196. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10691316.2013.789680.
박자현. (2013). 토픽모델링을 활용한 국내 문헌정보학 연구동향 분석. 정보관리학회지, 30(1), 7-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2013.30.1.007.
서은경. (2013). Detecting Research Trends in Korean Information Science Research, 2000-2011. 정보관리학회지, 30(4), 215-239. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2013.30.4.215.
손혜인. (2016). 기록관리학 분야 국내 학술지의 연구동향에 관한 연구: 「한국기록관리학회지」와 「기록학연구」를 중심으로. 정보관리학회지, 33(1), 85-110. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2016.33.1.085.
Ali Uzun. (2004). Assessing internationality of scholarly journals through foreign authorship patterns: the case of major journals in information science, and scientometrics. Scientometrics, 61(3), 457-465. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/B:SCIE.0000045121.26810.35.