바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

  • P-ISSN1013-0799
  • E-ISSN2586-2073
  • KCI

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.35 No.2

Citation Share

Key Factors in the Implementation of Research Data Management Services

Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management / Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, (P)1013-0799; (E)2586-2073
2018, v.35 no.2, pp.141-165
https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2018.35.2.141


& (2018). Key Factors in the Implementation of Research Data Management Services. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 35(2), 141-165, https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2018.35.2.141

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to determine crucial factors of consideration in ensuring the successful implementation of research data management services. The study begins by extracting a range of service areas from their equivalent in existing research on data management services. It then collects relevant information via e-mail survey from eight individuals respectively overseeing research data management services at six university libraries and one institution located throughout the United States, Germany, and Australia. Having originated in overseas cases, the resulting factors of consideration were reviewed by domestic experts in research data management services. The finalized areas of research data management services consist of nine categories. The crucial factors of consideration in RDM services are connection between research services and research data management services; national/university-level/institutional agreements; metadata entry personnel and required elements; strategies for the provision of specialized staff; major service area selection through user demand analysis; effective linkage between research data and research results; and close cooperation with users and related organizations.

keywords
research data, research data management(RDM), RDM services, RDM service considerations, RDM oversea cases, 연구데이터, 연구데이터 관리서비스, 서비스 고려사항, 해외 연구데이터 관리사례

Reference

1.

강희종. (2012). 21세기 핵심자원, 국가과학데이터 활용을 위한 정책 과제. STEPI Insight, (91), 1-26.

2.

김선태. (2010). 과학데이터 보존 및 활용모델에 관한 연구. 한국비블리아학회지, 21(4), 81-93.

3.

김은정. (2012). 연구데이터 수집에 영향을 미치는 요인 분석. 정보관리학회지, 29(2), 27-44. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2012.29.2.027.

4.

김지현. (2014). 대학도서관의 연구데이터관리서비스에 관한 연구- 미국 연구중심대학도서관을 중심으로 -. 한국비블리아학회지, 25(3), 165-189. http://dx.doi.org/10.14699/kbiblia.2014.25.3.165.

5.

서울대학교. 서울대학교 연구윤리지침.

6.

심원식. (2015). 국가 차원의 연구데이터 관리체계 구축을 위한 로드맵 제안 - 영국 사례 분석을 중심으로 -. 한국문헌정보학회지, 49(4), 355-378. http://dx.doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2015.49.4.355.

7.

심원식. (2016). 미국 대학도서관의 연구데이터 지원 서비스 사례 연구. 한국문헌정보학회지, 50(4), 311-332. http://dx.doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2016.50.4.311.

8.

이상환. (2009). 과학데이터의 공유와 활용. KISTI 지식리포트.

9.

Bouma, G. D. (2004). The Research Process:Oxford University Press.

10.

Carlson, J. email interview with the author.

11.

Cox, A. M. (2014). Research data management and libraries: Current activities and future priorities. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 46(4), 299-316.

12.

Hedstrom, M. (2008). Incentives for data producers to create “archive/ready” data: Implications for archives and records management (-). Proceedings from the Society of American Archivists Research Forum.

13.

Helbig, K. email interview with the author.

14.

Jones, S. (2013). How to Develop Research Data Management Services - a guide for HEIs’. http://www.dcc.ac.uk/resources/how-guides.

15.

Kozlowski, W. A. email interview with the author.

16.

Muilenburg, J. S. email interview with the author.

17.

Perry, C. M. (2008). Archiving of publicly funded research data: A survey of Canadian researchers. Government Information Quarterly, 25(1), 133-148. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2007.04.008.

18.

Simons, N. email interview with the author.

19.

Wolf, N. email interview with the author.

Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management

e-Submission OA Policy