바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

The Influences of Attractive Ad Model on Product Evaluation: Competitive Context and Product Type Effect

Abstract

According to prior research on body image, attractive body image induces the contradicting effect. For example, Grabe, Ward and Hyde(2008) suggested that attractive body image led to positive effects. Yet Argo, White and Dahl(2006) suggested that attractive body image led to negative effects. Thus, the current research suggested a moderating varibale, competitive context, to investigate the influence of attractive ad model on product evaluation. The results revealed that the attractive ad model led more favorable evaluation in noncompetitive context than in competitive context. By contrast, non-attractive ad model led more favorable evaluation in competitive context than in noncompetitive context. And these results may be differed by the type of product.

keywords
competitive context, ad model, social comparison, body image

Reference

1.

박은아, 성영신 (2001). 광고모델에 대한 소비자 지각이 구매의도에 미치는 영향: 신체이미지 비교를 중심으로. 한국심리학회지:소비자․광고, 2(1), 87-116.

2.

Argo, J. J., White, K., & Dahl, D. W (2006). Social Comparison Theory and Deception in the Interpersonal Exchange of Consumption Information. Journal of Consumer Research, 33, 99-108.

3.

Carnevale, P. J. & Probst, T. M. (1998). Social Values and Social Conflict in Creative Problem Solving and Categorization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1300-1309.

4.

Collins, R. L. (1996). For Better or Worse: The Impact of Upward Social Comparison on Self-Evaluations. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 51-69.

5.

Erdogan, B. Z., Michael J. Baker, M. J., & Tagg, S. (2001). Selecting Celebrity Endorsers: The Practitioner’s Perspective. Journal of Advertising Research, 41, 39-48.

6.

Grabe, S., Ward, L. M., & Hyde, S. H. (2008). The Role of the Media in Body Image Concerns Among Women: A Meta-Analysis of Experimental and Correlational Studies. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 460-476.

7.

Gibbons, F. X. & Buunk, B. P. (1999). Individual Differences in Social Comparison: Development of a Scale of Social Comparison Orientation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 129-142.

8.

Hargreaves, D. & Tiggmann, M. (2004). Idealized Media Images and Adolescents Body Image:“Comparing” Boys and Girls. Body Image, 1, 351-361.

9.

Kahle, L. R. & Homer, P. M. (1985). Physical Attractiveness of the Celebrity Endorser: A Social Adaptation Perspective. Journal of Consumer Research, 11, 954-961.

10.

Kamins, M. A. (1990). An Investigation into the Match-up Hypothesis in Celebrity Advertising:When Beauty May Be Only Skin Deep. Journal of Advertising, 18, 4-10.

11.

Lockwood, P. & Kunda, Z. (1997). Superstars and Me: Predicting the Impact of Role Models on the Self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 91-103.

12.

Mills, J. S., Polivy, J., Herman, D. P., & Tiggemann, M. (2002). Effects of Exposure to Thin Media Images: Evidence of Self-Enhancement among Restrained Eaters. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1687-1699.

13.

Mussweiler, T. (2003). Comparison Processes in Social Judgment: Mechanism and Consequences. Psychological Review, 110, 472-489.

14.

Mussweiler, T. & Strack, F. (2000). The Relative Self: Informational and Judgmental Consequences of Comparative Self-Evaluation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 23-38.

15.

Norton, D. A., Lamberton, C. P., & Naylor, R. W. (2013). The Devil You (Don't) Know:Interpersonal Ambiguity and Inference Making in Competitive Contexts. Journal of Consumer Research, 40, 1-16.

16.

Patrick, H., Neighbors, C., & Knee, C. R. (2004). Appearance-Related Social Comparisons: The Role of Contingent Self-Esteem and Self-Perceptions of Attractiveness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 501-514.

17.

Richins, M. L. (1991). Social Comparison and the Idealized Images of Advertising. Journal of Consumer Research, 18, 71-83.

18.

Smeesters, D. & Mandel, N. (2006). Positive and Negative Media Image Effects on the Self. Journal of Consumer Research, 32, 576-582.

19.

Smeesters, D., Mussweiler, T., & Mandel, N. (2010). The Effects of Thin and Heavy Media Images on Overweight and Underweight Consumers: Social Comparison Processes and Behavioral Implications. Journal of Consumer Research, 36, 930-949.

20.

Solomon, M. R., Ashmore, R. D., & Longo, L. C. (1992). The Beauty Match-up Hypothesis:Congruence Between Types of Beauty and Product Images in Advertising. Journal of Advertising, 21, 23-34.

21.

Stapel, D. A. & Koomen, W. (2005). Competition, Cooperation, and the Effects of Others on Me. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 1029-1038.

22.

Stapel, D. A. & Tesser, A. (2001). Self-Activation Increases Social Comparison. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 742-750.

23.

Stice, E. & Shaw, H. E. (1994). Adverse Effects of the Media Portrayed Thin-Ideal on Women and Linkages to Bulimic Symptomatology. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 13, 288-308.

24.

Tesser, A., Millar, M., & Moore, J. (1988). Some Affective Consequences of Social Comparison and Reflection Processes: The Pain and Pleasure of Being Close. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 49-61.

25.

Tiggemann, M. & Slater, A. (2003). Thin Ideals in Music Television: A Source of Social Comparison and Body Dissatisfaction. The International Journal of Eating Disorders, 35, 48-58.

26.

Till, B. D & Busler, M. (2000). The Match-up Proposition: Physical Attractiveness, Expertise, and the Role of Fit on Brand Attitude, Purchase Intent and Brand Beliefs. Journal of Advertising, 29, 1-14.

27.

Toma, C., Yzerbyt, V., & Corneille, O. (2010). Anticipated Cooperation Vs. Competition Moderates Interpersonal Projection. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 375-381.

28.

Wilcox, K. & Laird, J. D. (2000). The Impact of Media Images of Super-Slender Women on Women's Self-Esteem: Idetification, Social Comparison, and Self-Perception. Journal of Research in Personality, 34, 278-286.

logo