바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

The Effect of Corporate Public Relationship on Consumers' Behavior Intention - Focus on Comparison between Tech-Intensity of Product -

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to investigate actual components of corporate public relationship and is to examine the effect of the components on consumers' behavior intention. The empirical surveys were conducted with companies selected by tech-intensity of product. Exploratory factor analysis results for investigating of actual components of corporate public relationship show 6 components such as trust, social contribution, satisfaction, intimacy and familiarity, mutual relationship, and mutual control. Those results show also that company of high tech-intensity product is evaluated higher than company of low tech-intensity product as to components of social contribution and mutual relationship. This study is conducted regression analysis to examine how the components of corporate public relationship influence on consumers' behavior intention according to companies of tech-intensity product. Those results show that component of mutual control exerts the most effect on complaining intention of dissatisfaction and component of satisfaction exerts the most effect on accepting intention of price rise and maintaining intention of loyalty in regardless of companies of tech-intensity product. However, other significant components exert effect differently according to companies of tech-intensity product. The component of intimacy and familiarity exerts more effect comparatively on all consumers' behavior intention in case of company of low tech-intensity product. The component of social contribution and the component of trust influence exert more effect comparatively on all consumers' behavior intention in case of company of high tech-intensity product.

keywords
Public Relationship, Consumers' Behavior Intention, Tech-Intensity of Product

Reference

1.

김영욱, (2001) 기업 평판을 이용한 PR 책임성 모델 연구, 홍보학연구

2.

김충현 ; 오미영, (2003) 조직-공중관계성과 이미지의 관계: 행위적 관계와 상징적 관계의 상호작용, 한국언론학보

3.

김화동, (2007) 기술집약도에 따른 생산원산지 측면에서의 국가이미지 경쟁력 요소: 한국, 일본, 중국 등 3개국을 중심으로, 한국경영교육논총

4.

김홍빈, (2003) 호텔의 기업이미지가 고가치와 행동의도에 미치는 영향, 호텔 관광연구

5.

조성도, (2005) 소재 브랜드와 원산지 정보가 기술제품에 대한 소비자 평가에 미치는 영향과 사전지식의 조절효과 연구, 마케팅관리연구

6.

조전근, (2002) 원산지국가의 단서, 메시지 강도, 및 사전지식이 제품의 품질에 대한 지각에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구, 한국광고홍보학보

7.

한정호, (2000) 방송사의 공중 관계성 측정지 수의 개발에 관한 연구, 홍보학연구

8.

Broom, G. M, (1997) Toward a Concept and Theory of Organization-Public Relationships, Journal of Public Relations Research

9.

Broom, G. M, (2000) Concept and Theory of Organization-Public Relationships, Public Relations as Relationship Management: A Relational Approach to Public Relations, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates

10.

Bruning,S.D, (2002) Relationship Building as a Retention Strategy: Linking Relationship Attitudes and Satisfaction Evaluations to Behavioral Outcomes, Public Relations Review

11.

Bruning, S. D, (1998) Organization-Public Relationships and Consumer Satisfaction: Role of Relationships in the Satisfaction Mix, Communication Research Reports

12.

Bruning, S. D, (2000) Perceptions of Relationships and Evaluations of Satisfaction: An Exploration of Interaction, Public Relations Review

13.

Cutlip, Scott M, (2000) Effective Public Relations, 7th ed, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., Prentice-Hall

14.

Ehling,W.P, (1992) Excellence in Public Relations and Communication Management, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrencce Erlbaum Associates

15.

Engel, F. James, (1995) Consumer Behavior. 8th Edition, The Dryden Press

16.

Ferguson,M.A, (1984) Building Theory in Public Relations: Inter-Organizational Relationships, A Paper presented at the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, Gainesville

17.

Grunig,J.E, (1993) Image and Substance: From Symbolic to Behavioral Relationships, Public Relation Review

18.

Grunig, J. E, (1992) What is an Effective Organization?, Excellence in Public Relations and Communication Management, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlabaum

19.

Grunig, J. E, (2000) From Organizational Effectiveness to Relationship Indicators: Antecedents of Relationships, Public Relations Strategies, and Relationship Outcomes, Public Relations as Relationship Management, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates

20.

Hon, L. C, (1999) Guidelines for Measuring Relationship in Public Relations, The Institute for Public Relations

21.

Huang,Y, (1997) Values of Public Relations: Effects on Organization-Public Relationships Mediating Conflict Resolution, Journal of Public Relations Research

22.

Kim,Y.W, (2001) Searching for the Organization-Public Relationship: A Valid and Reliable Instrument, Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly

23.

Ledingham, J. A, (1998) Relationship Management in Public Relations:Dimensions of an Organization-Public Relationship.Public Relations, Relationship Management in Public Relations: Dimensions of an Organization-Public Relationship. Public Relations Review

24.

Morgan, R. M, (1994) The Commitment-Trust Theory of Relationship Marketing, Journal of Marketing

25.

Nunally,Jun C, (1978) Psychometic Theory, New York: MacGraw-Hill

26.

Parasuraman, A, (1996) The Behavioral Consequences of Service Quality, Journal of Marketing

logo