The Detection of PTSD Malingering Using an Implicit Memory Task

임나리; 최윤경

doi:10.15842/CPKJOURNAL.PUB.6.2.117

ISSN : 2466-0787

논문 상세

논문 투고

6권 2호

Citation
Share

암묵기억 과제를 이용한 외상 후 스트레스 장애 꾀병의 탐지: 대학생을 중심으로

The Detection of PTSD Malingering Using an Implicit Memory Task

임나리 (계명대학교)
최윤경 (계명대학교)

한국심리학회지: 임상심리 연구와 실제 / Clinical Psychology in Korea: Research and Practice, (P)2466-0787;

2020, v.6 no.2, pp.117-138

https://doi.org/10.15842/CPKJOURNAL.PUB.6.2.117

임나리, & 최윤경. (2020). 암묵기억 과제를 이용한 외상 후 스트레스 장애 꾀병의 탐지: 대학생을 중심으로. 한국심리학회지: 임상심리 연구와 실제, 6(2), 117-138, https://doi.org/10.15842/CPKJOURNAL.PUB.6.2.117

복사

초록

본 연구의 목적은 꾀병집단, 유사외상집단 및 통제집단을 대상으로 암묵기억 과제와 외상 후 스트레스 장애(PTSD) 증상과 긍정 및 부정 정서에 대한 주관적 보고에서 수행 차이를 비교하는 것이었다. 본 연구는 3⨯(2)⨯(2) 혼합 설계로서 처치 조건(PTSD 꾀병, 유사외상, 통제)은 피험자 간 요인으로, 단어어간완성검사에서 단어의 정서성(외상 단어, 중립 단어) 및 친숙성(고, 저)은 피험자 내 요인으로 설정하였다. 참여자는 각 집단마다 30명씩으로 구성된 대학생 90명이었다. 참여자는 먼저 단어어간완성과제를 수행하였고, 그 다음으로 일련의 자기보고식 검사를 실시하였다. 집단 간 차이를 분석한 결과, 꾀병집단은 유사외상집단과 통제집단보다 부정 정서 점수가 더 높게 나타났으며, 긍정 정서 점수는 더 낮게 나타났다. 처치 × 단어의 친숙성의 이원 상호작용이 유의하게 나타났다. 친숙성이 높은 단어에 대한 점화율에서 세 집단 간 차이는 나타나지 않았으나, 꾀병집단과 통제집단은 친숙성이 낮은 단어의 점화율에서 차이가 유의한 차이를 보였다. 또한 처치 × 단어의 정서성의 이원 상호작용이 유의하게 나타났다. 중립 단어에 대한 점화율에서 세 집단 간 차이는 유의하지 않았으나, 꾀병집단과 통제집단은 외상 단어에 대한 점화율에서 유의한 차이를 보였다. 본 연구의 결과는 PTSD 꾀병을 탐지하는 데 있어 암묵기억 과제가 사용될 수 있다는 가능성을 시사한다. 마지막으로, 본 연구의 한계점과 후속연구를 위한 제언이 논의되었다.

keywords: 외상 후 스트레스 장애, 꾀병, 유사외상, 점화, 암묵기억, Posttraumatic stress disorder, Malingering, Analogue trauma, Priming, Implicit memory

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the performance in implicit memory task and several subjective reports measuring symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and positive and negative affects among a PTSD malingering group, an analogue trauma group and a control group. A 3×2×2 mixed-design method was used. Group (malingered PTSD vs. analogue trauma vs. control) was between-subjects factor and word emotionality (trauma vs. neutral words) and word familiarity (high vs. low) in word-stem completion task were within-subjects factors. The participants were 90 college students, comprising 30 individuals per group. Participants initially performed a word-stem completion task and then completed the self-report measures. The results showed that malingering subjects scored significantly higher in the negative emotions than for analogue trauma and control subjects. Significant two-way interactions were found for group × word familiarity and group × word emotionality. These results suggest that implicit memory tasks can be used in the detection of PTSD malingering. The limitations of this study are discussed along with suggestions for further research.

keywords: 외상 후 스트레스 장애, 꾀병, 유사외상, 점화, 암묵기억, Posttraumatic stress disorder, Malingering, Analogue trauma, Priming, Implicit memory

참고문헌

국립국어연구원 (2005). 현대 국어 사용 빈도 조사 2. 서울: 국립국어연구원.

김용희, 정애자, 정상근, 유제민 (2004). 꾀병척도의 타당도 연구: 경도 두부손상 환자를 중심으로. Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 23, 231-242.

김정택, 신동균 (1978). STAI의 한국표준화에 관한 연구. 최신의학, 21, 1223-1229.

남보라, 권호인, 권정혜 (2010). 한국판 외상 후 스트레스 진단 척도의 신뢰도 및 타당도 연구. Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 29, 147-167.

보험사기방지센터 (2019). 2018년 보험사기 적발금액 8천억원, 신고포상금 24억원. 보험사기방지센터.

영국 퀜트 경찰서 (2009). 교통사고 공익광고 영상. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v= howY08Gz_mk 에서 인출.

이장규 (2011). 정신감정이 의뢰된 범죄자의 꾀병평가: M-FAST와 PAI 중심으로. 한국심리학회지: 법정, 2, 217-235.

American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.

Amir, N., McNally, R. J., & Wiegartz, P. S. (1996). Implicit memory bias for threat in posttraumatic stress disorder. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 20, 625-635.

10.

Anderson, J. R., & Bower, G. H. (1974). A propositional theory of recognition memory. Memory and Cognition, 2, 406-412.

11.

Arnett, P. A., Hammeke, T. A., & Schwartz, L. (1995). Quantitative and qualitative performance on Rey's 15-Item Test in neurological patients and dissimulators. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 9, 17-26.

12.

Binder, L. M. (1993). Assessment of malingering after mild head trauma with the Portland Digit Recognition Test. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 15, 170-182.

13.

Bourg, S., Connor, E. J., & Landis, E. E. (1995). The impact of expertise and sufficient information on psychologists' ability to detect malingering. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 13, 505-515.

14.

Brady, K. T., Killeen, T. K., Brewerton, T., & Lucerini, S. (2000). Comorbidity of psychiatric disorders and posttraumatic stress disorder. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 61, 22-32.

15.

Collins, A. M., & Loftus, E. F. (1975). A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review, 82, 407-428.

16.

Davis, H. P., King, J. H., Klebe, K. J., Bajszar, G., Bloodworth, M. R., & Wallick, S. L. (1997). The detection of simulated malingering using a computerized priming test. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 12, 145-153.

17.

Ehlers, A., & Clark, D. M. (2000). A cognitive model of posttraumatic stress disorder. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 38, 319-345.

18.

Ehring, T., & Ehlers, A. (2011). Enhanced priming for trauma-related words predicts posttraumatic stress disorder. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 120, 234-239.

19.

Faust, D., & Ackley, M. A. (1998). Did you think it was going to be easy? In C. R. Reynolds (Ed.), Detection of malingering during head injury litigation (pp. 261-286). New York: Plenum Press.

20.

Foa, E. B., Cashman, L., Jaycox, L., & Perry, K. (1997). The validation of a self-report measure of posttraumatic stress disorder: The Posttraumatic Diagnostic Scale. Psychological Assessment, 9, 445-451.

21.

Graf, P., & Schachter, D. L. (1985). Implicit and explicit memory for new associations in normal and amnesic subjects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 11, 501-518.

22.

Hall, H. V., & Poirier, J. (2000). Detecting malingering and deception: Forensic distortion analysis. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press.

23.

Halligan, S. L., Clark, D. M., & Ehlers, A. (2002). Cognitive processing, memory, and the development of PTSD symptoms: Two experimental analogue studies. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 33, 73-89.

24.

Holmes, E. A., & Bourne, C. (2008). Inducing and modulating intrusive emotional memories: A review of the trauma film paradigm. Acta Psychologica, 127, 553-566.

25.

Horowitz, M. J. (1975). Intrusive and repetitive thoughts after experimental stress. Archives of General Psychiatry, 32, 1457-1463.

26.

Koch, W. J., O’Neill, M., & Douglas, K. S. (2005). Empirical limits for the forensic assessment of PTSD litigants. Law and Human Behavior, 29, 121-149.

27.

Laposa, J. M., & Alden, L. E. (2008). The effect of pre-existing vulnerability factors on a laboratory analogue trauma experience. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 39, 424-435.

28.

Lazarus, R. S., & Alfert, E. (1964). Short-circuiting of threat by experimentally altering cognitive appraisal. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 69, 195-205.

29.

Lazarus, R. S., Opton, E. M., Nomikos, M. S., & Rankin, N. O. (1965). The principle of short circuiting of threat: Further evidence. Journal of Personality, 33, 622-635.

30.

Meyer, D. E., & Schvaneveldt, R. W. (1971). Facilitation in recognizing pairs of words: Evidence of a dependence between retrieval operations. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 90, 227-234.

31.

Michael, T., Ehlers, A., & Halligan, S. L. (2005). Enhanced priming for trauma-related material in posttraumatic stress disorder. Emotion, 5, 103-112

32.

Miller, H. A. (2001). M-FAST: Miller-Forensic Assessment of Symptoms Test professional manual. Odessa, Florida: Psychological Assessment Resources.

33.

Neely, J. H. (1977). Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory: Roles of inhibitionless spreading activation and limited-capacity attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 106, 226-254.

34.

Power, M. J. (2006). The structure of emotion: An empirical comparison of six models. Cognition and Emotion, 20, 694-713.

35.

Rey, A. (1964). L'examen clinique en psychologie. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

36.

Roediger, H. L., & McDermott, K. B. (1993). Implicit memory in normal human subjects. In F. Boller & J. Grafman (Eds.), Handbook of neuropsychology (pp. 63-131). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers.

37.

Rogers, R., & Cruise, K. R. (1998). Assessment of malingering with simulation designs: Threats to external validity. Law and Human Behavior, 22, 273-285.

38.

Schacter, D. L., Bowers, J., & Booker, J. (1989). Intention, awareness, and implicit memory: The retrieval intentionality criterion. In S. Lewandowsky, J. C. Dunn & K. Kirsner (Eds.), Implicit memory: Theoretical issues (pp. 47-65). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

39.

Silva, J. A., Leong, G. B., Harry, B. E., Ronan, J., & Weinstock, R. (1998). Dangerous misidentification of people due to flashback phenomena in posttraumatic stress disorder. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 43, 1107-1111.

40.

Sparr, L. F., & Atkinson, R. M. (1986). Posttraumatic stress disorder as an insanity defense: Medicolegal quicksand. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 143, 608-613.

41.

Speisman, J. C., Lazarus, R. S., Mordkoff, A., & Davison, L. (1964). Experimental reduction of stress based on ego-defense theory. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 68, 367-380.

42.

Spielberger, C. D., & Gorsuch, R. L. (1983). State-Trait Anxiety Inventory for adults: Sampler set, manual, test, scoring key. Menlo Park, CA: Mind Garden.

43.

Spielberger, C. D., Gorsuch, R. L., & Lushene, R. E. (1970). Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

44.

Wiggins, E. C., & Brandt, J. (1988). The detection of simulated amnesia. Law and Human Behavior, 12, 57-78.

바로가기메뉴

논문 상세

6권 2호

암묵기억 과제를 이용한 외상 후 스트레스 장애 꾀병의 탐지: 대학생을 중심으로

The Detection of PTSD Malingering Using an Implicit Memory Task

초록

Abstract

참고문헌