바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
사전등록 바로가기
 

logo

메뉴
search

ISSN : 0376-4672

논문 상세

다음
논문 투고

61권 8호

알카자이트 수복재와 글라스아이오노머 수복재의 불소 유리량, pH 및 항균성 평가

Evaluation of fluoride release, pH and antibacterial activity of alkasite restorative material and glass Ionomer

이승은 (원광대학교 치과대학 소아치과학교실)
배지명 (원광대학교 치과대학 치과생체재료학교실 및 생체재료매식연구소)
라지영 (원광대학교 치과대학 소아치과학교실)
대한치과의사협회지 / The Journal of the Korean Dental Association, (P)0376-4672; (E)2713-7961
2023, v.61 no.8, pp.504-514
https://doi.org/10.22974/jkda.2023.61.8.001
이승은, 배지명, & 라지영. (2023). 알카자이트 수복재와 글라스아이오노머 수복재의 불소 유리량, pH 및 항균성 평가. 대한치과의사협회지, 61(8), 504-514, https://doi.org/10.22974/jkda.2023.61.8.001

Abstract

Evaluation of fluoride release, pH and antibacterial activity of alkasite restorative material and glass Ionomer Seung-Eun Lee1, Ji-Myung Bae2, Ji-Young Ra1 1Department of Pediatric Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Wonkwang University 2Department of Dental Biomaterials and the institute of Biomaterials and Implant, College of Dentistry, Wonkwang University Purpose: This study aimed to compare the antibacterial activity, pH, and fluoride release of alkasite restorative material (Cention N) and glass ionomer restorative materials (Fuji IX GP, Fuji II LC). Materials and method: Agar diffusion test was used to determine the antibacterial activity against Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus casei. The inhibition zone was measured after 24 hours. The amount of fluoride released was measured on days 1, 3, 7, 14, 21, 28, 42, 56 and 84. The pH was measured after 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 hours. Results: All restorative materials showed antibacterial activity. Results of the Streptococcus mutans, showed the follow­ing sequence: CHX > Fuji IX GP > Fuji II LC > Cention N (p<0.05). The Lactobacillus casei results showed the following sequence: CHX >Fuji II LC > Cention N > Fuji IX GP (p<0.05). All materials showed a continuous fluoride release; Fuji IX GP showed significantly higher fluoride release, compared with Fuji II LC and Cention N. The pH test, results showed the following sequence: Cention N > Fuji IX GP > Fuji II LC. Conclusion: Continuous fluoride release for 3 months and antibacterial activity was observed in Cention N as well as in glass ionomer cements. Cention N showed highest pH among all materials. Further studies are required to evaluate the properties of Cention N in clinical conditions.

keywords
Alkasite restorative material, Glass ionomer, pH, Fluoride release, Antibacterial activity

참고문헌

1.

1. Marquis RE. Antimicrobial actions of fluoride for oral bacteria. Can J Microbiol. 1995;41:955-964.

2.

2. Loveren CV. The antimicrobial action of fluoride and its role in caries inhibition. J Dent Res. 1990;69:676-681. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345900690S131.

3.

3. Forsten L. Short- and long-term fluoride release from glass ionomers and other fluoride-containing filling materials in vitro. Eur J Oral Sci. 1990;98:179-185. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.1990.tb00958.x

4.

4. Friedl KH, Schmalz G, Miller KA, Shams M. Resin-modified glass ionomer cements: fluoride release and influence on Streptococcus mutans growth. Eur J Oral Sci. 1997;105:81-85. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.1997.tb00184.x

5.

5. Seppä L, Korhonen A, Nuutinen A. Inhibitory effect on S. mutans by fluoride-treated conventional and resin-reinforced glass ionomer cements. Eur J Oral Sci. 1995;103:182-185. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.1995.tb00022.x

6.

6. Shellis RP, Duckworth RM. Studies on the cariostatic mechanisms of fluoride. Int Dent J. 1994;44:263-273.

7.

7. Yap AU, Khor E, Foo SH. Fluoride release and antibacterial properties of new-generation tooth colored restoratives. Oper Dent. 1999;24:297-305.

8.

8. Ten Cate JM. In vitro studies on the effects of fluoride on deand remineralization. J Dent Res. 1990;69:614-619. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345900690.

9.

9. Forsten L. Fluoride release and uptake by glass-ionomers and related materials and its clinical effect. Biomaterials. 1998;19:503-508.

10.

10. Barkhordar RA, Kempler D, Pelzner RR, Stark MM. Technical note: antimicrobial action of glass-ionomer lining cement on S. sanguis and S. mutans. Dent Mater. 1989 Jul;5(4):281-282.

11.

11. Berg JH. The continuum of restorative materials in pediatric dentistry-a review for the clinician. Pediatr Dent. 1998;20:93-100.

12.

12. Guggenberger R, May R, Stefan KP. New trends in glass-ionomer chemistry. Biomaterials. 1998;19:479-483. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(97)00127-0.

13.

13. Robertello FJ, Coffey JP, Lynde TA, King P. Fluoride release of glass ionomer–based luting cements in vitro. J Prosthet Dent. 1999;82:172-176. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(99)70152-6.

14.

14. Wiegand A, Buchalla W, Attin T. Review on fluoride-releasing restorative materials—fluoride release and uptake characteristics, antibacterial activity and influence on caries formation. Dent Mater. 2007;23:343-362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2006.01.022.

15.

15. Lavis JF, Peters TC, Makinson OF, Mount G. Changes to Dyract restorative resin immersed in various media. Am J Dent. 1997;10:133-136.

16.

16. Kim SM, Park HW, Lee JH, Seo HW. Fluoride release and microhardness of giomer according to time. J Korean Acad Pediatr Dent. 2010;37:429-437.

17.

17. Shaw AJ, Carrick T, McCabe JF. Fluoride release from glassionomer and compomer restorative materials: 6-month data. J Dent. 1998;26:355-359. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(97)00016-X.

18.

18. Balagopal S, Nekkanti S, Kaur K. An in vitro evaluation of the mechanical properties and fluoride-releasing ability of a new self-cure filling material. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2021;22:134-139.

19.

19. Adsul PS, Dhawan P, Tuli A, Khanduri N, Singh A. Evaluation and comparison of physical properties of Cention N with other restorative materials in artifical saliva: An in vitro study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2022;15:350-355.

20.

20. Lee KH, Kim JS, Shin JS, Han MR. Comparison of microhardness and compressive strength of alkasite and conventional restorative materials. J Korean Acad Pediatr Dent. 2020;47:320-326.

21.

21. Ahn JH, Lee SH, Lee NY, Shin HW, Jih MK. Color stability of alkasite restorative material : in vitro studies. J Korean Acad Pediatr Dent. 2022;49:428-441.

22.

22. Bhadra D, Shah NC, Rao AS, Dedania MS, Bajpai N. A 1-year comparative evaluation of clinical performance of nanohybrid composite with Activa TM bioactive composite in class II carious lesion : a randomized control study. J Conserv Dent. 2019;22:92-96.

23.

23. Shiozawa M, Takahashi H, Iwasaki N. Fluoride release and mechanical properties after 1 year water storage of recent restorative glass ionomer cements. Clin Oral Investig. 2014;18:1053-1060.

24.

24. Luczaj-Cepowicz E, Marczuk-Kolada G, Zalewska A, Pawinska M, Leszczynska K. Antibacterial activity of selected glass ionomer cements. Postepy Hig Med Dosw(Online). 2014;68:23-28.

25.

25. Kidd EA, Joyston-Bechal S, Beighton D. The use of caries detector dye during cavity preparation: a microbiological assessment. Br Dent J. 1993;174:245-248. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4808142.

26.

26. Besic FC. The fate of bacteria sealed in dental cavities. J Dent Res. 1943;22:349-354.

27.

27. Gultz J, Do L, Boylan R, Kaim J, Scherer W. Antimicrobial activity of cavity disinfectants. Gen Dent. 1999;47:187-190.

28.

28. Fisher FJ. The viability of micro-organisms in carious dentine beneath amalgam restorations. Br Dent J. 1966;121:413-416.

29.

29. Brännström M. The cause of postrestorative sensitivity and its prevention. J Endod. 1986;12:475-481.

30.

30. Fraga RC, Siqueira Jr JF, Uzeda MD. In vitro evaluation of antibacterial effects of photo-cured glass ionomer liners and dentin bonding agents during setting. J Prosthet Dent. 1996;76:483-486. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(96)90005-0.

31.

31. Loyola-Rodriguez JP, Garcia-Godoy F, Lindquist R. Growth inhibition of glass ionomer cements on mutans streptococci. Pediatr Dent. 1994;16:346-349.

32.

32. Palenik CJ, Behnen MJ, Setcos JC, Miller CH. Inhibition of microbial adherence and growth by various glass ionomers in vitro. Dent Mater. 1992;8:16-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(92)90047-G.

33.

33. Liao Y, Brandt BW, Li JY, Crielaard W, Loveren CV, Deng DM. Fluoride resistance in Streptococcus mutans: a mini review. J Oral Microbiol. 2017;9:1344509. https://doi.org/10.1080/20002297.2017.1344509.

34.

34. Welin-Neilands J, Svensater G. Acid tolerance of biofilm cells of Streptococcus mutans. Appl Environ Microb. 2007;73:5633-5638. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01049-07.

35.

35. Hamilton IR. Biomechemical Effects of fluoride on Oral bacteria. J Dent Res. 1990;69:660-667. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345900690S128.

36.

36. Krischke W, Schröder M, Trösch W. Continuous production ofL-lactic acid from whey permeate by immobilized Lactobacillus casei subsp.casei . Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 1991;34:573–578.

37.

37. Yoo IK, Chang HN, Lee EG, Chang YK, Moon SH. Effect of pH on the production of lactic acid and secondary products in batch cultures of lactobacillus casei. J Microbiol Biotechnol. 1996;6:482-486.

38.

38. Todd J: Scientific Documentation: Cention N. Ivoclar-Vivadent Press: Schaan, Liechtenstein, 1-58, 2016.

39.

39. Samanta S, Das UK, Mitra A: Comparison of microleakage in class V cavity restored with flowable composite resin, glass ionomer cement and cention N. Imp J Interdiscip Res, 3:180-183, 2017.

40.

40. Lee D, Kim J, Han M, Shin J: Fluoride Release and Recharge Properties of Several Fluoride-Containing Restorative Materials. J Korean Acad Pediatr Dent, 2020;47:196-204.

41.

41. Freedman R, Diefenderfer KE. Effects of daily fluoride exposures on fluoride release by glass ionomer based restorativs. Oper Dent. 2003;28:178-185.

42.

42. Itota T, Carrick TE, Yoshiyama M, McCabe JF. Fluoride release and recharge in giomer, compomer and resin composite. Dent Mater. 2004;20:789-795. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2003.11.009.

43.

43. Kamijo K, Mukai Y, Tominaga T, Iwaya I, Fujino F, Hirata Y et al. Fluoride release and recharge characteristics of denture base resins containing surface pre-reacted glass ionomer filler. Dent Mater J. 2009;28:227-233. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.28.227.

44.

44. Silverstone LM. Fluoride and remineralization in clinical uses of fluoride. Philadelphia, Les & Febiger. p153-175.

45.

45. Arends J, Christoffersen J. Nature and role of loosely bound fluoride in dental caries. J Dent Res. 1990;69:601-605. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345900690S118.

46.

46. Sales D, Sae-Lee D, Matsuya S, Ana ID. Short-term fluoride and cations release from polyacid-modified composites in a distilled water, and an acidic lactate buffer. Biomaterials. 2003;24:1687-1696. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(02)00545-8.

47.

47. Itota T, Al-Naimi OT, Carrick TE, Yoshiyama M, McCabe JF. Fluoride release from aged resin composites containing fluoridated glass filler. Dent Mater. 2005;21:1033-1038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2004.11.008.

48.

48. Attin T, Buchalla W, Siewert C, Hellwig E. Fluoride release/uptake of polyacid-modified resin composites(compomers) in neutral and acidic buffer solutions. J Oral Rehabil. 1999;26:388-393. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.1999.00413.x.

logo

논문 투고
OA 정책