open access
메뉴
open access
메뉴
ISSN : 0376-4672
The marginal bone loss (MBL) and survival rates of dental implants in patients with disabilities were compa rable to those reported for patients without disabilities. Despite the viability of implants for disabled patients, socioeconomic issues and general condition of disabled patients prevent them from receiving as many implants as they require in edentulous areas. However, because of the difficulty of adaptation, the use of complete den tures (CD) is not the preferred treatment option for those with disabilities. Consequently, disabled patients can benefit from the convenience and lower cost of an implant surveyed crown retained removable partial denture (IC-RPD). The survival rates and MBL of those implants in IC-RPD have already established the clinical ac ceptability as a treatment option for patients who are not disabled. IC-RPD can be future implant treatment strategies for disabled patients.
1. Anders PL, Davis EL. Oral health of patients with intellectual disabilities:a systematic review. Special care in dentistry : official publication of the American Association of Hospital Dentists, the Academy of Dentistry for the Handicapped, and the American Society for Geriatric Dentistry 2010;30:110-117.
2. Cumella S, Ransford N, Lyons J, Burnham H. Needs for oral care among people with intellectual disability not in contact with Community Dental Services. Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR 2000;44 ( Pt 1):45-52.
3. Adell R, Lekholm U, Rockler B, Brånemark PI. A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Int J Oral Surg 1981;10:387-416.
4. Paul, S., Rafal, M., & Houtenville, A. (2020). Annual Disability Statistics Compendium: 2020 is found in http://disabilitycompendium. org.
5. National Council of Disability presented reports on poverty of disability. This information can be found in https://ncd.gov/newsroom/2017/disability-poverty-connection-2017-progress-report-release.
6. Yoo SY, Kim SK, Heo SJ, Koak JY, Seo KS. Could Fixed Implants Be a Viable Treatment Option in Disabled Patients? A Clinical Retrospective Study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2023;38:562-568.
7. Misch CE, Perel ML, Wang HL, Sammartino G, Galindo-Moreno P, Trisi P, et al. Implant success, survival, and failure: the International Congress of Oral Implantologists (ICOI) Pisa Consensus Conference. Implant Dent 2008;17:5-15.
8. Pjetursson BE, Brägger U, Lang NP, Zwahlen M. Comparison of survival and complication rates of tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) and implant-supported FDPs and single crowns (SCs). Clin Oral Implants Res 2007;18 Suppl 3:97-113.
9. Pjetursson BE, Thoma D, Jung R, Zwahlen M, Zembic A. A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of implantsupported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) after a mean observation period of at least 5 years. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012;23Suppl 6:22-38.
10. Ekfeldt A, Zellmer M, Carlsson GE. Treatment with implantsupported fixed dental prostheses in patients with congenital and acquired neurologic disabilities: a prospective study. Int J Prosthodont 2013;26:517-524.
11. Albrektsson T, Buser D, Sennerby L. On crestal/marginal bone loss around dental implants. Int J Prosthodont 2012;25:320-322.
12. Yoo SY, Kim SK, Heo SJ, Koak JY, Jeon HR. New Rehabilitation Concept for Maxillary Edentulism: A Clinical Retrospective Study of Implant Crown Retained Removable Partial Dentures. J Clin Med. 2021;10(8):1773.
13. Yoo SY, Kim SK, Heo SJ, Koak JY, Jeon HR. Clinical Performance of Implant Crown Retained Removable Partial Dentures for Mandibular Edentulism—A Retrospective Study. J Clin Med 2021;10(10): 2170.
14. Yoo SY, Kim SK, Heo SJ, Koak JY. Clinical and radiographic evaluations of implants as surveyed crowns for Class I removable partial dentures: A retrospective study. J Adv Prosthodont. 2022;14(2):108-121.
15. Sadowsky, S.J. Treatment considerations for maxillary implant overdentures: A systematic review. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2007;97;340–348.
16. Andreiotelli, M.; Att, W.; Strub, J.R. Prosthodontic complications with implant overdentures: A systematic literature review. Int. J.Prosthodont. 2010;23;195–203.
17. Raghoebar, G.M.; Meijer, H.J.; Slot, W.; Slater, J.J.; Vissink, A. A systematic review of implant-supported overdentures in the edentulous maxilla, compared to the mandible: How many implants? Eur. J. Oral Implantol. 2014;7 (Suppl. 2);S191–S201.
18. Thomason, J.M. The McGill Consensus Statement on Overdentures. Mandibular 2-implant overdentures as first choice standard of care for edentulous patients. Eur. J. Prosthodont. Restor. Dent. 2002;10;95–96.
19. Thomason, J.M.; Kelly, S.A.; Bendkowski, A.; Ellis, J.S. Two implant retained overdentures–a review of the literature supporting the McGill and York consensus statements. J. Dent. 2012; 40;22–34.