바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

메뉴

Validation study of the two-factor theory of anxiety sensitivityin panic disorder and somatoform disorder

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that the anxiety sensitivity known as a major mechanism of panic disorder may be divided into dual factors, one being somatic sensitivity, the other being catastrophic interpretation. For this purpose, we modified the anxiety sensitivity index-revised(ASI-R) into two-step rating, somatic sensitivity in the first step and cognitive interpretation in the second step, that can reflect the dual factors. In study 1, we compared panic group and somatization group with control group(each 30 subjects) selected from 500 college students. As predicted from dual factor hypothesis, in the first step rating of somatic sensation, the somatization group exceeded the panic group. However in the second rating(catastrophizing), the panic group did not exceed the somatization group. In study 2, panic patients and somatoform disorder patients(each 30 patients) were compared with 30 normal controls. In the somatic sensation factor, the result of study 1 was replicated, and in the catastrophic interpretation factor, the predicted difference was revealed. That is, in the catastrophic interpretation the panic patients were higher than somatoform disorder patients. These findings support the validity of dual factor hypothesis which says that although panic disorder and somatoform disorder share two-factor structure, panic disorder may be dominant in catastrophic interpretation and somatoform disorder may be prominent in somatic sensation. The dual factor theory may build a conceptual bridge between anxiety sensitivity research and Clark's cognitive model of panic disorder. In clinical settings, it will also contribute to the differential diagnosis and therapy of panic disorders.

keywords
anxiety sensitivity, two-factor theory, panic disorder, somatoform disorder, 불안민감성, 이요인 이론, 공황장애, 신체형 장애, anxiety sensitivity, two-factor theory, panic disorder, somatoform disorder

Reference

1.

(1998) 신체화의 인지특성 연구 한국판 신체감각 증폭척도와 증상해석 질문지의 신뢰도와 타당도 연구,

2.

(2001) 불안 민감성의 개념과 작용에 대한 개관,

3.

(2000) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Author.

4.

(1993) Anxiety sensitivity and its relationship to spontaneous and cued panic attacks in college students,

5.

(2002) Anxiety and its disorders (2nd ed.), The Guilford Press

6.

(1990) The Somatosensory Amplification Scale and its Relationship to hypochondriasis Journal of Psychiatry Research,

7.

(1986) A cognitive approach to panic,

8.

(1988) A cognitive model of panic attacks,

9.

(1992) Situations and specific coping strategies associated with clinical and nonclinical panic attacks,

10.

(1996) Development of an expanded Anxiety Sensitivity Index: Multiple dimensions and their correlates.,

11.

(1996) Anxiety sensitivity and treatment outcome in panic disorder,

12.

(2001) Somatoform and Factitious Disorders, Springer.

13.

(1992) Anxiety sensitivity in 1984 and panic attacks in 1987,

14.

(1987) Anxiety sensitivity in agoraphobics,

15.

(1986) Factors associated with panic attacks in nonclinical subjects,

16.

(2001) Generalized anxiety disorders, panic disorders, and phobias. , Springer.

17.

(1991) Expectancy theory of fear,

18.

(1986) anxiety frequency and the prediction of fearfulness,

19.

(1994) Cognitive behavioral treatment compared to nonprescriptive treatment for panic disorder Archives of General Psychiatry,

20.

(1992) Anxiety sensitivity and dependency in clinical and non-clinical panickers and controls Journal of Anxiety Disorders,

21.

(1995) Anxiety sensitivity:Theoretical perspectives and recent findings,

22.

(1996) Nature and measurement of anxiety sensitivity Reply to Lilienfeld ,

23.

(1998) An expanded Anxiety Sensitivity Index:Evidence for a hierarchic structure in a clinical sample,

logo