open access
메뉴
open access
메뉴
E-ISSN : 2733-4538
A major use of neuropsychological evaluations is to measure changes in cognitive functioning over time. However, it is difficult to determine whether a difference in test performance indicates a real change in the individual or simply a product of normal variation. The current study established normative rates of change in the Korean Dementia Rating Scale (K-DRS) from baseline to follow-up testing among 247 neurologically normal adults aged 50 years and older. Normative retest data were presented for two analytic techniques: the Reliable Change Index adjusted for practice (RCIp) and the Standardized Regression-Based Technique (SRB). With respect to K-DRS total scores and all subtest scores, the most powerful predictor of changes in performance was initial performance. This results suggested strong regression to the mean. Education and age were also significant predictors for some subtests. Further, participants who were more highly educated as well as younger participants demonstrated more improvement with regard to test performance. Considering the prediction intervals and the base rates of decliner and improver, the SRB seemed to provide more unbiased, reasonable prediction intervals than the RCIp.
강연욱, 박재설, 유경호, 이병철 (2009). 혈관성 인지 장애 선별검사로서 Korean-Montreal Cognitive Assessment(K-MoCA)의 신뢰도, 타당도 및 규준 연구. 한국심리학회지: 임상, 28(2), 549-562.
권용철, 박종한 (1989). 노인용 한국판 Mini- Mental State Examination(MMSE-K)의 표준화 연구 - 제 1편: MMSE-K의 개발. 신경정신의학. 28(1), 125-135.
문혜성, 최진영 (2004). 한국 장노년 성인의 문식성과 신경심리기능. 노인정신의학, 8(2), 113-120.
안효정, 최진영 (2004). 노인용 이야기 회상 검사의 표준화 연구. 한국심리학회지: 임상, 23(2), 435-454.
최진영 (1998). 한국판 치매 평가 검사: Korean- Dementia Rating Scale. 서울: 학지사.
최진영, 나덕렬, 박선희, 박은희 (1998). 한국판 치매 평가 검사의 타당도와 신뢰도 연구. 한국심리학회지: 임상, 17(1). 247-258.
Chelune, G. J., Naugle,R. I., Luders, H., Sedlak, J.,&Awad, I. A. (1993). Individual change after epilepsy surgery: Practice effects and base-rate information. Neuropsychology, 7, 41-52.
Chey, J., Na, D. R., Park, S., Park, E., & Lee, S. (1999). Effects of education in dementia assessment: Evidence from standardizing the Korean-Dementia Rating Scale. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 13(3), 293-302.
Chey, J., Na, D. G., Tae, W. S., Ryoo, J. W., Hong, S. B. (2006). Medial temporal lobe volume of nondemented elderly individuals with poor cognitive functions. Neurobiology of Aging, 27(9), 1269-1279.
Crane, P. K., Narasimhalu, K., Gibbons, L. E., Mungas, D. M., Haneuse, S., Larson, E. B., Kuller, L., Hall, K., & van Belle, G.(2008). Item response theory facilitated cocalibrating cognitive tests and reduced bias in estimated rates of decline. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 61(10), 1018-1027.
Cummings, J. L., & Benson, D. F. (1983). Dementia: A clinical approach. Boston: Butterworth.
Freedman M. Kaplan. E., Delis, D., & Morris, R. (1994). Clock Drawing: A Neuropsychological Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.
Frerichs, R.J., Tuokko, H.A. (2005). A comparison of methods for measuring cognitive change in older adults. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 20, 321-333.
Heaton, R. K., Temkin, N., Dikmen, S., Avitable, N., Taylor, M. J., Marcotte, T. D., & Grant I. (2001). Detecting change: A comparison of three neuropsychological methods, using normal and clinical samples. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 16, 75-91.
Hensel, A., Angermeyer, M. C., & Riedel-Heller, S.G. (2007). Measuring cognitive change in older adults: reliable change indices for the Mini-Mental State Examination. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 78, 1298-1303.
Jacobson, N. S., & Truax, P. (1991). Clinical significance: A statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59, 12-19.
Jurica, P. J., Leitten, C. L., & Mattis, S. (2001). Dementia Rating Scale-2: Professional Manual. Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
Koffler, S. L. (1980). A comparison of approaches for setting proficiency standards. Journal of Educational measurement, 17, 167-178.
Lucas, J. A., Ivnik, R. J., Smith, G. E., Bohac, D. L., Tangalos, E. G., Kokmen, E., Graff- Radford, N. R., & Petersen, R. C. (1998). Normative data for the Mattis Dementia Rating Scale. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 20(4), 536-547.
Maassen, G. (2000). Principles of defining reliable change indices. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 22, 622-632.
Mattis, S. (1988). Dementia Rating Scale (DRS): Professional Manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assemssment Resources.
McCaffrey, R. J., Ortega, A., & Haase, R. F. (1993). Effects of repeated Neuropsychological assessment. Archives in Clinical Neuropsychology, 8, 519-524.
McSweeny, A. J., Naugle, R. I., Chelune, G. J., & Luders, H. (1993). “T scores for change”:An illustration of a regression approach to depicting change in clinical neuropsychology. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 7, 300-312.
Pedraza O, Smith GE, Ivnik R J, Willis F B, Ferman T J, Petersen R C, Graff-Radford N R, Lucas J A. (2007). Reliable change on the Dementia Rating Scale. Journal of International Neuropsychological Society, 13, 716-720.
Raymond, P. D., Hinton-Bayre, A. D., Radel, M., Ray, M., & Marsh, N. A. (2006). Test-retest norms and reliable change indices for the MicroCog battery in a healthy community population over 50 years of age. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 20, 261-270.
Rilling, L. M., Lucas, J. A., Ivnik, R. J., Smith, G. E., Willis, F.B., Ferman, T.J., Petersen, R. C., & Graff-Radford, N. R. (2005). Mayo's Older African American Normative Studies: Norms for the Mattis Dementia Rating Scale. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 19, 229-242.
Salinsky, M. C., Storzbach, D., Dodrill, C. B., & Binder, L. M. (2001). Test-retest bias, reliability, and regression equations for neuropsychological measures repeated over a 6-12 week period. Journal of International Neuropsychological Society, 7, 597-605.
Shay, K. A., Duke, L. W., Conboy, T., Harrell, L. E., Callaway, R, & Folks, D. G. (1991). The clinical validity of the Mattis Dementia Rating Scale in staging Alzheimer's dementia. Journal of Geriatric, Psychiatric, and Neurology, 4, 18-25.
Temkin, N. R., Heaton, R. K., Grant, I., & Dikmen, S. S. (1999). Detecting significant change in neuropscyhological test performance: A comparison of four models. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 5, 357-369.
Winblad, B., Palmer, K., Kivipelto, M., Jelic, V., Fratiglioni, L., Wahlund, L.-O., Nordberg, A., Bäckman, L., Albert, M., Almkvist, O., Arai, H., Basun, H., Blennow, K., de Leon, M., DeCarli, C., Erkinjuntti, T., Giacobini, E., Graff, C., Hardy, J., Jack, C., Jorm, A., Ritchie, K., van Duijn, C., Visser, P., & Petersen, R. C. (2004). Mild cognitive Impairment: beyond controversies, towards a consensus: report of the International Working Group on Mild Cognitive Impairment. Journal of Internal Medicine, 256, 240-246.