바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

메뉴

논문 상세

한국판 긍정 정서 반응 척도(K-RPA)의 예비 타당화 연구

Preliminary Validation of Korean-Responses to Positive Affect (K-RPA)

초록

본 연구의 목적은 정서조절 및 기분장애 연구에서 동등한 중요성을 가질 수 있음에도 불구하고 거의 연구되지 않았던 긍정 정서에 대한 반응양식을 측정하기 위하여 최근 개발된 Responses to Positive Affect(RPA; Feldman, Joorman, & Johnson, 2008)를 번안 및 예비 타당화하는 것이다. 이를 위하여 191명의 대학생 집단에서 국문으로 번안한 한국판 긍정 정서 반응 척도(Korean-Responses to Positive Affect)와 부정 정서에 대한 반응양식, 자존감, 우울, 조증과 관련된 척도들을 실시하고, 신뢰도와 요인구조, 수렴 및 증분타당도를 살펴보았다. K-RPA는 적절한 신뢰도를 갖고 있었으며, 탐색적 요인분석 결과, 서양 문화권의 3요인 구조와는 달리 긍정 반추와 가라앉히기의 2요인 구조를 갖고 있는 것으로 나타났다. K-RPA의 긍정 반추 요인은 자존감, 조증 취약성 및 조증 증상과 정적 상관을, 우울 증상과는 부적 상관을 갖고 있는 반면, K-RPA의 가라앉히기 요인은 자존감과는 부적 상관을, 우울 및 조증 증상과는 정적 상관을 갖고 있었다. 위계적 회귀분석 시, K-RPA의 하위 요인들은 우울 및 조증 증상을 예측하는 데 추가적 설명량을 갖고 있었으며, 이는 이미 밝혀진 우울 반추의 영향력을 통제한 뒤에도 유의미하게 유지되는 것으로 나타났다. 본 연구는 긍정 정서에 대한 반응양식의 개인차를 측정할 수 있는 도구를 국내에서 처음으로 번안 및 예비 타당화하였다는 의의를 지닌다. 또한 이후 우울과 조증 등 기분장애 연구에서 부정 정서뿐만 아니라 긍정 정서에 대한 반응양식과 긍정 정서조절이 중요한 연구 주제로 다루어져야 할 필요성을 시사한다. 마지막으로 본 연구의 한계점 및 후속 연구를 위한 제언에 대하여 논의하였다.

keywords
한국판 긍정 정서 반응 척도(K-RPA), 정서조절, 우울, 조증, 신뢰도, 타당도, 요인구조, Korean-Responses to Positive Affect(K-RPA), Emotional Regulation, Depression, Mania, Reliability, Validity, Factor Structure

Abstract

A number of studies have documented that responses to negative moods can have an impact on development and maintenance of mood disorders. Notably, Nolen-Hoeksema's Response Styles Theory (1991) which proposes that rumination in response to dysphoric moods is linked to the onset and duration of depression has received extensive attention. However, responses to positive affect have been less investigated, even though they might be equally important in research on mood disorders. The main purpose of the current study is to validate the Responses to Positive Affect (RPA; Feldman, Joorman, & Johnson, 2008), which is a recently developed self-report measure of ruminative and dampening responses to positive affect. In an undergraduate sample (N=191), the Korean-Responses to Positive Affect (K-RPA) evidenced acceptable internal consistency and two factors (positive rumination, dampening) emerged in exploratory factor analysis. In addition, the K-RPA showed convergent and incremental validity with concurrent measures of self-esteem, depressive and manic symptoms. In particular, both subfactors of the K-RPA predicted a significantly additional variance in depressive and manic symptoms, even after controlling for the influence of brooding. The current study provides the initial psychometric properties of the K-RPA and preliminary evidence indicating that responses to positive affect can be a concept of importance in future researches of mania as well as depression. Finally, limitations of the current study and suggestions for future research are discussed.

keywords
한국판 긍정 정서 반응 척도(K-RPA), 정서조절, 우울, 조증, 신뢰도, 타당도, 요인구조, Korean-Responses to Positive Affect(K-RPA), Emotional Regulation, Depression, Mania, Reliability, Validity, Factor Structure

참고문헌

1.

김소정, 김지혜, 윤세창 (2010). 한국판 반추적 반응 척도(K-RRS)의 타당화 연구. 한국심리학회지: 임상, 29, 1-19.

2.

김영아 (1990). 경조성 대학생 집단의 심리적인 특성. 연세대학교 석사학위 논문.

3.

김은정 (1993). 우울증상 지속에 영향을 주는 인지 및 행동 변인들. 연세대학교 박사학위 논문.

4.

이영호, 송종용 (1991). BDI, SDS, MMPI-D 척도의 신뢰도 및 타당도에 대한 연구. 한국심리학회지: 임상, 15, 98-113.

5.

이훈진, 원호택 (1995). 편집증적 경향, 자기개념, 자의식 간의 관계에 대한 탐색적 연구. 한국심리학회 ‘95 연차대회 학술발표논문집, 277-290.

6.

Altman, E. S., Hecker, D., Peterson, J. L., & Davis, J. M. (1997). The altman self-rating mania scale. Biological Psychiatry, 42, 948-955.

7.

Beck, A. T., Ward, C. H., Mendelson, M., Mock, J., & Erbaugh, J. (1961). An inventory for measuring depression. Archives of General Psychiatry, 4, 561-571.

8.

Bijittebier, P., Raes, F., Vasey, M. W., & Feldman, G. C. (2011). Responses to positive affect predict mood symptoms in children under conditions of stress: A prospective study. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 40, 381-389.

9.

Bryant, F. B. (2003). Savoring beliefs inventory (SBI): A scale for measuring beliefs about savoring. Journal of Mental Health, 12, 175-196.

10.

Clark, L. A. & Watson, D. (1991). Tripartite model of anxiety and depression: Psychometric evidence and taxonomic implications. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 103, 103-116.

11.

Costello, A. B., & Osborne, J. W. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 10, 1-9.

12.

Eckblad, M., & Chapman, L. J. (1986). Development and validation of a scale for hypomanic personality. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 95, 214-222.

13.

Feldman, G. C., Joorman, J., & Johnson, S. L. (2008). Responses to positive affect: A self-report measure of rumination and dampening. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 32, 507-525.

14.

Gross, J. (1998). The emerging field of emotion regulation: An integrative review. Review of General Psychology, 2, 271-299.

15.

Gruber, J., Harvey, A. G., & Gross, J. J. (2012). When trying is not enough: emotion regulation and the effort-success gap in bipolar disorder. Emotion, 12, 997-1003.

16.

Gruber, J. (2011). Can feeling too good be bad? Positive emotion persistence (PEP) in bipolar disorder. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 217-221.

17.

Johnson, S. L., McKenzie, G., & McMurrich, S. (2008). Ruminative responses to negative and positive affect among students diagnosed with bipolar disorder and major depressive disorder. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 32, 702-713.

18.

Johnson, S. L. (2005). Mania and dysregulation in goal pursuit: A review. Clinical Psychology Review, 25, 241-262.

19.

Johnson, S. L., Ruggero, C., & Carver, C. (2005). Responses to reward among people vulnerable to mania. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 24, 894-906.

20.

Joorman, J. & Siemer, M. (2004). Memory accessibility, mood regulation, and dysphoria: Difficulties in repairing sad mood with happy memories? Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 113, 179-188.

21.

Just, N., & Alloy, L. B. (1997). The response styles theory of depression: Tests and an extension of the theory. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 106, 221-229.

22.

Kaiser. H. (1974). An index for factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39, 32-36.

23.

Kaiser, H. (1961). A note on Guttman's lower bound for the number of common factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1, 249-276.

24.

Kim, S., Yu, B. H., Lee, D. S., & Kim, J-H. (2011). Ruminative response in clinical patients with major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, and anxiety disorders. Journal of Affective Disorders, 136, e77-e81.

25.

Knowles, R., Tai, S., Christensen, I., & Bentall, R. (2005). Coping with depression and vulnerability to mania: A factor analytic study of the Nolen-Hoeksema (1991) Response Styles Questionnaire. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 44, 99-112.

26.

Kwapil, T. R., Miller, M. B., Zinser, M. C., Chapman, L. J., Chapman, J., & Eckblad, M. (2000). A longitudinal study of high scorers on the hypomanic personality scale. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 109, 222-226.

27.

Lam, D., & Wong, G. (1997). Prodromes, coping strategies, insight and social functioning in bipolar affective disorders. Psychological Medicine, 27, 1091-1100.

28.

Larsen, R. J. & Prizmic, Z. (2004). Affect regulation. In Vohs, K. D. & Baumeister, R. F. (Eds.) Handbook of self-regulation: Research, theory, and applications. New York: Guilford.

29.

Martin, L. T. & Tesser, A. (1996). Some ruminative thoughts. In Wyer, R. S. (Eds.) Ruminative thoughts. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

30.

Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (1991). Responses to depression and their effects on the duration of depressive episodes. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 100, 569-582.

31.

Nolen-Hoeksema, S., & Morrow, J. (1991). A prospective study of depression and posttraumatic stress symptoms after a natural disaster: The 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 115-121.

32.

Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric Theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw Hill.

33.

Parrot, G. W. (1993). Beyond hedonism: Motives for inhibiting good moods and for maintaining bad moods. In Wegner, D. M. & Pennebaker, J. W. (Eds.) Handbook of mental control. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

34.

Raes, F., Daems, K., Feldman, G. C., Johnson, S. L., & Van Gucht, D. (2009). A psychometric evaluation of the Dutch version of the responses to positive affect questionnaire. Psychologica Belgica, 49, 293-310.

35.

Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

36.

Rottenberg, J., Kasch, K. L., Gross, J. J., & Gotlieb, I. H. (2002). Sadness and amusement reactivity differentially predict concurrent and prospective functioning in major depressive disorder. Emotion, 2, 135-146.

37.

Spitzer, R. L., Williams, J. B. W., Gibbon, M., & First, M. D. (1992). The structured clinical interview for DSM-Ⅲ-R, I: History, rationale, and description. Archives of General Psychiatry, 49, 624-629.

38.

Thomans, J., Knowles, R., Tai, S., & Bentall, R. P. (2007). Response styles to depressed mood in bipolar affective disorder. Journal of Affective Disorders, 100, 249-252.

39.

Treynor, W., Gonzales, R., & Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (2003). Rumination reconsidered: A psychometric analysis. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 27, 247-259.

40.

Wood, J. V., Heimpel, S. A., & Michela, J. L. (2003). Savoring versus dampening: Self-esteem differences in regulating positive affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 566-580.

logo