바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

메뉴

Effects of Cognitive Defusion and Psychological Flexibility on Reduction in Anxiety Responses to a Public-Speaking Situation and Attentional bias among Undergraduate Students

Abstract

The primary aim of this study was to examine the relative impacts of cognitive defusion treatment on anxiety responses to a public-speaking situation, the emotional discomfort and believability of self-referential thoughts, and the degree of attentional bias, as compared to a thought distraction treatment. A secondary aim of the current study was to explore the role of psychological flexibility as a moderator in these treatment effects. University students were randomly assigned to either cognitive defusion(n=27) or thought distraction(n=23) conditions. As expected, under the cognitive defusion condition, a greater decrease was observed in subjective anxiety responses to an impromptu speech situation and the emotional discomfort and believability of negative self-referential thoughts when compared with the thought distraction condition. Next, the partial effects of the cognitive defusion treatment on diastolic blood pressure and pulse immediately after relaxation period were moderated by the levels of psychological flexibility. Moreover, psychological flexibility was shown to moderate the efficacy of the cognitive defusion treatment on the believability of negative self-referential thoughts immediately after the speech. In addition, under the cognitive defusion condition, the extent of cognitive interference on a modified Stroop task showed a greater reduction when compared with the thought distraction condition, when controlling for treatment expectancy and psychological flexibility. In conclusion, the results suggest that cognitive defusion is a useful intervention for reducing speech anxiety responses and the emotional discomfort and believability of negative self-referential thoughts, and that psychological flexibility may emerge as a moderator of the relative efficacy of cognitive defusion.

keywords
인지적 탈융합, 심리적 유연성, 자기-참조적인 부정적 사고, 사고 분산, 주의 편향, 발표불안, cognitive defusion, psychological flexibility, negative self-referential thoughts, thought distraction, attentional bias, speech anxiety

Reference

1.

권효석, 이장한 (2010). 인지적 탈융합 처치를 통한 불안민감성 감소: 호흡계 증상에 대한 두려움을 중심으로. 한국심리학회지: 임상, 29(3), 745-760.

2.

김기평 (2011). 인지적 탈융합 처치가 발표불안의 부정적인 자동적 사고와 불안반응에 미치는 효과. 중앙대학교 대학원 석사학위 청구논문.

3.

김수인, 백지숙 (2013). 대학생의 발표불안에 대한 수용전념 집단치료의 효과-인지적 탈융합기법을 중심으로. 한국심리학회지: 상담 및 심리치료, 25(1), 19-40.

4.

김 환, 이훈진 (2008). 진술문 반복 읽기가 부정적 기분 개선에 미치는 영향. 인지행동치료, 8(1), 29-40.

5.

문현미 (2006). 심리적 수용 촉진 프로그램의 개발과 효과: 수용-전념 치료 모델을 중심으로. 가톨릭대학교 대학원 박사학위 청구논문.

6.

박성신 (2006). 수용처치가 대학생의 발표불안 감소에 미치는 영향. 한림대학교 대학원 석사학위 청구논문.

7.

성형모, 김정범, 박영남, 배대석, 이선희, 안현의 (2008). 한국어판 백 우울 설문지 2판의 신뢰도 및 타당도 연구. 생물치료정신의학, 14(2), 201-212.

8.

신미연 (2006). 사회불안 경향성자의 위협자극에 대한 주의 편향의 시간 과정. 중앙대학교 대학원 석사학위 청구논문.

9.

윤혜영 (2010). 사회불안장애의 인지행동치료 효과: 주의 편향과 암묵적 자존감을 중심으로. 고려대학교 대학원 박사학위 청구논문.

10.

이정흠 (1998). 불안장애 환자의 선택적 주의 편향 특성. 고려대학교 대학원 석사학위 청구논문.

11.

조용래 (2006). 비디오 피드백이 사회불안장애 집단의 사회적 자기상의 개선에 미치는 효과. 인지행동치료, 6, 23-39.

12.

조용래 (2007). 발표불안에 대한 비디오 피드백의 효과: 중재변인과 매개변인. 한국심리학회지: 임상, 26(2), 293-322.

13.

조용래, 원호택 (1997). 대인불안에 대한 인지적 평가: 사회적 상호작용에 대한 자기 효능감 척도의 개발과 타당도에 관한 연구. 심리학의 연구문제, 4, 397-434.

14.

조용래, 원호택 (1999). 사회공포증에 대한 인지적 평가 Ⅲ: 역기능적 신념검사의 개발 및 타당화. 한국심리학회지: 임상, 18. 141-162.

15.

조용래, 이민규, 박상학 (1999). 한국판 발표불안척도의 신뢰도와 타당도에 관한 연구. 한국심리학회지: 임상, 18(2), 165-178.

16.

허재홍, 최명식, 진현정 (2009). 한국어판 수용-행동 질문지 Ⅱ 신뢰도 및 타당도 연구. 한국심리학회지: 상담 및 심리치료, 21(4), 861-878.

17.

Beck, A. T., Emery, G., & Greenberg, R. (1985). Anxiety disorders and phobias: A cognitive perspective. New York: Basic Books.

18.

Beck, A. T., Steer, R. A., & Brown, G. K. (1996). BDI-II, Beck Depression Inventory: Manual (2nd ed.). Boston: Harcourt Brace.

19.

Becker, E. S., Rinck, M., Margraf, J., & Roth, W. T. (2001). The emotional Stroop effect in anxiety disorders: General emotionality or disorder specificity?, Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 15(3), 147-159.

20.

Beidel, D. C., Turner, S. M., Jacob, R. G., & Cooley, M. R. (1989). Assessment of social phobia: Reliability of an impromptu speech task. Journal of Anxiety Disorder, 3, 149-158.

21.

Bond, F. W., Hayes, S. C. Baer, R. A., Carpenter, K. M. Orcutt, H. K., Waltz, T., & Zettle, R. D. (2011). Preliminary psychometric properties of the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II: A revised measure of psychological flexibility and experiential avoidance. Behavior Therapy, 42, 676-688.

22.

Borkovec, T. D., & Nau, S. D. (1972). Credibility of analogue therapy rationales. Journal of Behaviour Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 3, 257-260.

23.

Clark, D. M., & Wells, A. (1995). A cognitive model of social phobia. In R. G. Heimberg, M. R. Leibowitz, D. A. Hope, & F. R. Schneier (Eds.), Social phobia: Diagnosis assessment, & treatment. (pp. 69-73). New York: Guilford Press.

24.

Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Mahwah NJ: Erlbaum.

25.

Dalrymple, K., & Herbert, J. D. (2007). Acceptance and commitment therapy for generalized social anxiety disorder: a pilot study. Behavior Modification, 31(5), 543-568.

26.

Hayes, S. C., Luoma, J. B., Bond, F. W., Masuda, A., & Lillis, J. (2006). Acceptance and commitment therapy: Model, processes and outcomes. Behavior Research and Therapy, 44, 1-25.

27.

Hayes, S. C., Strosahl, K. D., & Wilson, K. G. (1999). Acceptance and commitment therapy: An experiential approach to behavior change. New York: Guilford Press.

28.

Hayes, S. C., Strosahl, K. D., Bunting, K., Twohig, M, P., & Wilson, K. G. (2004). What Is Acceptance and Commitment Therapy? In S. C. Hayes, K. D. Strosahl (Eds.), A Practical Guide to Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (pp.3-29). New York: Springer.

29.

Healy, H, A., Barnes-holmes, Y., Barnes-holmes, D., Keogh, C., Luciano, C., & Wilson, K. (2008). An experimental test of a cognitive defusion exercise: Coping with negative and positive self-statements. The Psychological Record, 28, 623-640.

30.

Herbert, J. D., Rheingold, A. A., & Brandsma, L. L. (2001). Assessment of social anxiety and social phobia. In S. G. Hofmann & P. M. DiBartolo (Eds.), From social anxiety to social phobia: Multiple perspectives (pp. 20-45). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

31.

Hofmann, S. G., Heering, S., Sawyer, A. T., & Asnaani, A. (2009). How to handle anxiety: The effects of reappraisal, acceptance, and suppression strategies on anxious arousal, Behavior Research and Therapy, 47, 389-394.

32.

Hope, D. A., Rapee, R. M., Heimberg, R. G., & Dombeck, M. J. (1990). Representations of the self in social phobia: vulnerability to social threat. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 14(2), 177-189.

33.

Keele, K. D. (1948). The pain chart, Lanced, 2, 6-8.

34.

Lundh, L., & Ӧst, L. (2001). Attentional Bias, Self-consciousness and Perfectionism in Social Phobia Before and After Cognitive-Behaviour Therapy. Scandinavian Journal of Behaviour Therapy, 30, 4-16.

35.

MacLeod, C. (1991). Clinical anxiety and the selective encoding of threatening information. International Review of Psychiatry, 3, 279-292.

36.

Mahone, E. M., Bruch, M. A., & Heimberg, R. G. (1993). Focus of attention and social anxiety: The role of negative self-thoughts and perceived positive attributes of the other. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 17, 209-224.

37.

Masuda, A., Anderson, P. L., Wendell, J. W., Chou, Y. Y., Price, M., & Feinstein, A. B. (2011). Psychological flexibility mediates the relations between self-concealment and negative psychological outcomes. Personality and Individual Differences, 50(2), 243-247.

38.

Masuda, A., Boone, M. S., & Timko, C. A. (2011). The role of psychological flexibility in the relationship between self-concealment and disordered eating symptoms. Eating Behaviors, 12(2), 131-135.

39.

Masuda, A., Feinstein, A. B., Wendell, J. W., & Sheehan, S. T. (2010). Cognitive defusion versus thought distraction: A clinical rationale, training, and experiential exercise in altering psychological impacts of negative self- referential thoughts, Behavior Modification, 34(6), 520-538.

40.

Masuda, A., Hayes, S. C., Sackett, C. F., & Twohig, M. P. (2004). Cognitive defusion and self-referential negative thoughts: Examining the impact of a ninety year old technique. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 42, 477-485.

41.

Masuda, A., Twohig, M. P., Stormo, A. R., Feinstein, A. B., Chou, Y., & Wendell, J. W. (2010). The effects of cognitive defusion and thought distraction on emotional discomfort and believability of negative self-referential thoughts. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 41, 11-17.

42.

Mattia, J. I., Heimberg, R. G., & Hope, D. A. (1993). The revised Stroop color-naming task in social phobics. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 31(3), 305-313.

43.

McNeil, D. W., Ries, B. J., & Turk, C. L. (1995). Behavioral assessment: Self-report, physiology, and overt behavior. In R. G. Heimberg, M. R. Liebowitz, D. A. Hope, & F. R. Schneier (Eds.), Social phobia: Diagnosis, assessment, and treatment (pp. 202-231). New York: The Guilford Press.

44.

Paul, G. L. (1966). Insight versus desentization in psychotherapy. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

45.

Rapee, R. M., & Heimberg, R. G. (1997). A model of social phobia. Behavior Research and Therapy. 35, 740-756.

46.

Rodebaugh, L. T. (2004). I might look OK, but I’m still doubtful, anxious, and avoidant: The mixed effects of enhanced video feedback on social anxiety symptoms, Behaviour Research and Therapy, 42, 1435-1451.

47.

Singer, A. R., & Dobson, K. S. (2009). The effect of the cognitive style of acceptance on negative mood in a recovered depressed sample. Depression and anxiety, 26, 471-479.

48.

Spokas, M. E., Rodehaugh, T. L., & Heimberg, R. G. (2007). Cognitive biases in social phobia. Psychiatry, 6(5), 204-210.

49.

Twohig, M. P., Hayes, S. C., Plumb, J. C., Pruitt, L. D., Collins, A. B., Hazlett-Stevens, H., & Woidneck, M. R. (2010). A randomized clinical trial of acceptance and commitment therapy vs. progressive relaxation training for obsessive compulsive disorder. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 78(5), 705- 716.

logo