바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

메뉴

논문 상세

델파이 방법을 통한 한국 임상심리학의 교육훈련 방향성 모색

Study of a Korean Clinical Psychology Training Model: The Delphi Method

초록

본 연구는 임상 심리학계의 교육 모형에 관한 논의가 미미한 현 시점에서, 교육에 종사하는 전문가들을 대상으로 미래 교육 모형에 관한 합의를 도출하고자 하였다. 이를 위해 교육 모형 수정 및 합의 도출에 적절한 델파이 기법을 사용하였다. 전국 42명의 심리학과 교수를 대상으로 3차에 걸친 조사를 실시한 결과 17명이 최종 응답하였다. 1차 델파이 조사에서는 미래 교육 모형에 관한 예상되는 변화를 개진하도록하였다. 이를 바탕으로 제작한 2차 델파이 조사는 교육 모형에 관한 34개 문항에서 희망 정도와 가능성 정도를 추정하도록 하였다. 3차 델파이 조사는 다른 전문가 패널의 의견을 참고하여 34개 문항을 재추정할 수 있도록 하고, 주관적 의견을 기재할 수 있는 답변란을 제시하였다. 3차에 걸친 조사에서 전문가 패널의 의견 일치도를 알아보기 위해 Kendall's W test를 실시한 결과 희망 척도는 379.에서 .466으로 상승하였고 가능성 척도도 .201에서 .312로 증가하였다. Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Test를 실시한 결과 총 16개 문항에서 희망 척도와 가능성 척도 간 유의한 차이를 발견하였다. 각 문항의 평균 및 표준편차, 백분율 환산을 통한 차이 분석에서 희망 척도와 가능성 척도의 점수 차를확인하였다. 본 연구를 통하여 한국 임상심리학계의 곧 다가올 미래의 윤곽을 그릴 수 있었으며, 교육훈련모형을 통하여 나아가고자 하는방향성을 모색해 볼 수 있었다. 또한, 희망과 가능성의 차이를 통하여 임상심리학계의 발전에 있어서 걸림돌을 파악하였다. 본 연구의 의의는 학계 최초의 미래 임상심리학 교육훈련방향성에 대한 경험적인 논문으로서 단초를 제시한다는데 있다.

keywords
임상심리학, 훈련 모형, 대학원 훈련 프로그램, 델파이 방법, 과학자-임상가 모형, clinical psychology, training model, graduate training program, delphi method, scientist-practitioner model

Abstract

This study was carried out to find consensus on the future education and training model of Korean clinical psychology which had not been discussed in the past. Three phases of a Delphi survey targeted 42 professors of departments of psychology nationwide, and 17 of them finally responded. In the first phase of the Delphi survey, the participants were instructed to present their opinions on potential changes to the education and training model. In the second phase, drawn up based on the first phase, the participants were instructed to estimate their levels of hope and possibility through 34 questions. In the third phase, the participants were instructed to re-estimate their responses to the 34 questions by referring to the opinions of a panel of other Profesor, and an answer section through which subjective opinions could be presented was offered. Throughout the three phases of the Delphi survey, Kendall's W test was conducted to find the concordance rate with the specialist panel. The results showed that the scale of hope rose from .379 to .466, and the scale of possibility increased from .201 to .312. According to the Wilcoxon Signed-Rank test, significant differences were found between the scales of hope and possibility. An outline of the Korean clinical psychology field could be drawn through this study, and future directions could be sought through the education and training model. In addition, obstacles in the clinical psychology field could be identified through the difference between hope and possibility. This study is meaningful in that future directions for education and training in clinical psychology has been presented through an empirical study for the first time.

keywords
임상심리학, 훈련 모형, 대학원 훈련 프로그램, 델파이 방법, 과학자-임상가 모형, clinical psychology, training model, graduate training program, delphi method, scientist-practitioner model

참고문헌

1.

Abt, L. E. (1992). Clinical psychology and the emergence of psychotherapy. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 23, 176-178.

2.

Ahn, C. (2010). Clinical Psychology. Seoul: Sigmapress.

3.

Alonso-Arbiol, I., & van de Vijver, F. J. R. (2010). A historical analysis of the European Journal of Psychological Assessment: A comparison of the earliest (1992-1996) and the latest years (2005-2009). European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 26, 238-247.

4.

American Psychological Association (APA). (2016). Mission statement. Retrieved from http://www.div12.org/

5.

An, H. U. (2003). A discussion on the possibility of applying the scientist-practitioner model in Korea. Korean Journal of Counseling and Psychology, 15, 461-475.

6.

Anderson, N. B. (2006). Evidence-based practice in psychology. American Psychologist, 61, 271-285.

7.

Baker, D. B., & Benjamin Jr, L. T. (2000). The affirmation of the scientist-practitioner: A look back at Boulder. American Psychologist, 55, 241-247.

8.

Benjamin Jr., L. T. (2005). A historical of clinical psychology as a profession in America (and a glimpse at its future). Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 1, 1-30.

9.

Cherry, D. K., Messenger, L. C., & Jacoby, A. M. (2000). An examination of training model outcomes in clinical psychology programs. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 31, 562-568.

10.

Cho, H., Kim, Y., Yeom, A., & Yoon, S. (2015). Strategies for clinical application of neuroscience findings. Korean Journal of Biological Psychiatry, 22, 113-117.

11.

Dailey, A. L., & Holmberg, J. C. (1990). Delphi a catalytic strategy for motivating revision by faculty. Community/Junior College Quarterly of Research and Practice, 14, 129-136.

12.

Daily, A. L. (1988). Faculty consensus at a multi-campus college through delphi community. Junior College Quarterly of Research and Practice, 2, 129-136.

13.

Donohue, H., Stellefson, M., & Tennat, B. (2012). Advantages and limitations of the e-Delphi technique: Implications for health education researchers. American Journal of Health Education, 43, 38-46.

14.

Ebesutani, C., & Shin, S. H. (2014). Knowledge, attitudes, and usage of evidence-based assessment and treatment practices in the Korean mental health system: Current status and future directions. Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 33, 891-920.

15.

Ellis, H. C. (1992). Graduate education in psychology: Past, present, and future. American Psychologist, 47, 570-576.

16.

Fagan, T. J., Ax, R. K., Liss, M., Resnick, R. J., & Moody, S. (2007). Professional education and training: How satisfied are we? An exploratory study. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 1, 13-25.

17.

Fish, L. S., & Busby, D. M. (1996). The Delphi method. In D. H. Sprenkle(Ed.), Research methods in family therapy (pp. 469-482). New York: Guilford Press.

18.

Gibson, L. J., & Miller, M. M. (1990). A delphi model for planning 'preemptive' regional economic Diversification. Economic Development Review, 8, 34-41.

19.

Hilgard, E. R., Kelly, E. L., Luckey, B., Sanford, R. N., Shaffer, L. F., & Shakow, D. (1947). Recommended graduate training program in clinical psychology. American Psychologist, 2, 539-558.

20.

Hoch, E. L., Ross, A. O., & Winder, C. L. (1966). Conference on the professional preparation of clinical psychologists: A summary. American Psychologist, 21, 42-51.

21.

Hung, H. L., Altschuld, J. W., & Lee, Y. F. (2008). Methodological and conceptual issues confronting a cross-country Delphi study of educational program evaluation. Evaluation and Program Planning, 31, 191-198.

22.

Jaekal, E., Jang, S., Lee, G., & Choi, K. (2014). Systematic review of randomized controlled trials of psychotherapy in Korea. Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 33, 943-961.

23.

James, R. L., & Roberts, M. C. (2009). Future directions in clinical child and adolescent psychology: A Delphi survey. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 65, 1009-1020.

24.

Kendall, M. G., & Smith, B. B. (1939). The problem of m rankings. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics. 10, 275-287.

25.

Kim, J. (1983). Another perspective for clinical psychology. Korean Journal of Clinical and Counseling Psychology, 4, 3-6.

26.

Korean Clinical Psychology Association. (2016). Introducing Association. Retrieved from http://www.kcp.or.kr/sub01_1.asp?menuCategory=1

27.

Korean Psychological Association. (1996). Korean Psychological Association, 50 years. Seoul: Kyoyookbook.

28.

Kwon, J. H. (2008). Report on the 2007 survey findings on the Korean clinical psychologists' major roles and activities. Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 27, 571-579.

29.

Kwon, J. H., Kang, Y. W., Lee, H. J., Kim, E. K., & Chung, K. M. (2008). Clinical psychology (with InfoTrac). Seoul: Sigmapress.

30.

Lee, H. (1982). The role of clinical psychologists -its retrospectives and prospectives. Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 3, 3-11.

31.

Lee, H., Kim, S., Park, E., Kim, N., & Choi, S. (2014). Analysis of research in the Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology (1967-2013). Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 33, 919-945.

32.

Lee, J. S. (2001). Delphi Method. Seoul: Education Science.

33.

Lee, Y. K., & Lee, K. S. (2010). Research on forecasting the future of Korea’s junior colleges. The Journal of Vocational Education Research. 29, 69-90.

34.

Linstone, H. A., & Turoff, M. (Eds.). (1975). The Delphi method: Techniques and applications (Vol. 29). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

35.

Maher, B. A., & Maher, W. B. (1985). Psychopathology: II From the eighteenth century to modern times. In G. A. Kimble & K. Schlesinger (Eds.), Topics in the history of psychology (pp. 295-329). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

36.

McFall, R. M. (1991). Manifesto for a science of clinical psychology. The Clinical Psychologist, 44, 75-88.

37.

McFall, R. M. (2002). Training for prescriptions vs. prescriptions for training: Where are we now? Where should we be? How do we get there?. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 58, 659-676.

38.

McIlvried, E. J., Wall, J. R., Kohout, J., Keys, S., & Goreczny, A. (2010). Graduate training in clinical psychology: Student perspectives on selecting a program. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 4, 105-115.

39.

Miller, J. G. (1946). Clinical psychology in the Veterans Administration. American Psychologist, 1, 181-189.

40.

Na, Y., & Kim, H. B. (2011). A study of developing educational training program for flight attendants using Delphi technique. Journal of Tourism Sciences, 35, 465-488.

41.

Neimeyer, G. J., Taylor, J. M., & Rozensky, R. H. (2012). The diminishing durability of knowledge in professional psychology: A Delphi poll of specialties and proficiencies. Professional Psychology:Research and Practice, 43, 364-371.

42.

Nilsson, J. E., Berkel, L. V. A., Flores, L. Y., Love, K. M., Wendler, A. M., & Mecklenburg, E. C. (2003). An 11-year review of professional psychology: Research and practice. Content and sample analysis with an emphasis on diversity. Professional Psychology:Research and Practice, 34, 611-616.

43.

Norcross, J. C., Karpiak, C. P., & Santoro, S. O. (2005) Clinical psychologists across the years: The division of clinical psychology from 1960 to 2003. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 61, 1467-1483.

44.

Norcross, J. C., Pfund, R. A., & Prochaska, J. O. (2013). Psychotherapy in 2022: A Delphi poll on its future. Professional Psychology:Research and Practice, 44, 363-370.

45.

Okoli, C., & Pawlowski, S. D. (2004). The Delphi method as a research tool: An example, design considerations and applications. Information & Management, 42, 15-29.

46.

Peluso, D. L., Carleton, R. N., & Asmundson, G. J. (2010). Clinical psychology graduate students' perceptions of their scientific and practical training: A Canadian perspective. Canadian Psychology, 51, 133-139.

47.

Ready, R. E., & Santorelli, G. D. (2014). Values and goals in clinical psychology training programs: Are practice and science at odds?. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 45, 99-103.

48.

Ready, R. E., & Veague, H. B. (2014). Training in psychological assessment:Current practices of clinical psychology programs. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 45, 278-282.

49.

Resnick, J. H. (1997). Finally, a definition of clinical psychology: A message from the president, Division 12. The Clinical Psychology, 44, 3-11.

50.

Robiner, W. N. (1991). How many psychologists are needed? A call for a national psychology human resource agenda. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 22, 427-440.

51.

Roe, A. E., Gustad, J. W., Moore, B. V., Ross, S. E., & Skodak, M. E. (1959). Graduate education in psychology: Report of the Conference on Graduate Education in Psychology. Washington, DC:American Psychological Association.

52.

Romans, J. S., Boswell, D. L., Carlozzi, A. F., & Ferguson, D. B. (1995). Training and supervision practices in clinical, counseling, and school psychology programs. Professional Psychology:Research and Practice, 26, 407.

53.

Sanz, J. (2001). The decade 1989-1998 in Spanish psychology: An analysis of research in personality, assessment, and psychological treatment (Clinical and Health Psychology). The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 4, 151-181.

54.

Schmidt, R. C. (1997). Managing Delphi surveys using nonparametric statistical techniques. Decision Sciences, 28, 763-774.

55.

Schneider, S. F. (1991). No fluoride in our future. Professional Psychology:Research and Practice, 22, 456-460.

56.

Strother, C. R. (1956). Psychology and mental health. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

57.

Timothy, J. T. (2005). Clinical psychology (J. Kwon, Y. Kang, H. Lee, E. Kim, & K. JungTrans.). Seoul: Sigmapress.

58.

Vaillis, T. M., & Howes, J. L. (1995). The field of clinical psychology:Arriving at a definition. Canadian Psychology, 37, 120-127.

59.

Weaver, W. T. (1971). The Delphi forecasting method. The Phi Delta Kappan, 52, 267-271.

60.

Wilcoxon, F. (1945). Individual comparisons by ranking methods. Biometrics Bulletin, 1, 80-83.

61.

Yang, J. W., Min, B. B., Kim, J. H., Sung, T. H., Ye, Y. J., Lee, Y. J., ... Choi, S. W. (2017). Suggestions for the Training and Education of Clinical Psychologists in Korea. Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 36, 1-9.

62.

Yoon, S. K., Lee, S. W., Kim, S. W., Cho, B. J., & Choi, S. W. (2016). Evaluations of training courses of clinical psychologist from the trainees' perspective. Clinical Psychology in Korea: Research and Practice, 2, 59-87.

logo