- Apply for Authority
- P-ISSN1013-0799
- E-ISSN2586-2073
- KCI
A Metadata Representation Scheme based on XML Schema for Special Digital Collections
- Downloaded
- Viewed
Abstract
As there are diverse delivery media and forms of information resources, their management schemes are diverse as well. In library community, cataloguing rules for describing information resources such as AACR and KCR have been developed. The efforts to automate management of information resources based on these rules resulted in the development of MARC. However, MARC records are restricted in describing the information resources and MARC has various and distinct characteristics of the structural rigidity, which does not support the representation of extended semantic structures that exist among bibliographic entities. Therefore, since the data model for MARC is single-layer data model, it is not appropriate for describing information resources represented by multi-layer data model which can be used to set up the relationships among various objects in digital libraries. In this paper, we propose an a metadata model for digital libraries based on the IFLA FRBR basic model which supports multi-layer data model and a representation scheme based on XML Schema to manage the metadata about old books, old documents, resource related to music, conferences and seminars.
- keywords
- 다층 데이터 모델, 전자도서관, IFLA FRBR 기본 모델, XML 스키마multi-layer data model, digital library, IFLA FRBR model, XML Schema, 다층 데이터 모델, 전자도서관, IFLA FRBR 기본 모델, XML 스키마multi-layer data model, digital library, IFLA FRBR model, XML Schema
Reference
서울대학교 중앙도서관. (2002). 디지털 도서관 구축을 위한 XML Schema 메타데이터 구현연구.
오삼균. (2002). 시맨틱웹 기술과 활용방안. 정보관리학회지, 19(4), 297-320.
오삼균. (2002). 디지털도서관에서의 메타데이터의 역할. 정보과학회지, 20(8), 45-57.
조재인. (2003). 연관 저록의 구조적 접근을 위한 목록 체계 구축 및 평가에 관한 연구: 객체지향적 접근. 한국문헌정보학회, 37(3), 15-34.
허정회. (2003). 국가 URN기반 UCI 식별체계의 식별메타데이터 연구:한국전산원.
Ahmed,K. (2001). Professional XML Meta Data:Birmingham, UK: Wrox..
Bearman, D.. A Common Model to Support Interoperable Metadata: Progress report on reconcilating metadata requirements from the Dublin Core and INDECS/DOI. D-Lib Magazine, , -.
Beckett, D, Miller, E, Brickley, D. (2009). Expressing Simple Dublin Core in RDF/XML. http://www.dublincore.org/documents/2002/07/31/dcmes-xml/.
Berners-Lee, Tim. (2003). What do HTTP URIs Identify?. http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/ HTTP-UR.
Berners-Lee, T. (2000). “Semantic Web Development: Technical Proposal. http://www.w3.org/ 2000/01/sw/ DevelopmentProposal.
Booth, David. (2003). “Four Uses of a URL: Name, Concept, Web Location and Document Instance. http://www.w3.org/2002/11/dbooth-names/dbooth-names_clean.htm.
Bray, T, D. Hollander, A. Layman. (1999). Namespaces in XML. <http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml- names/.
Clark, Kendall Grant. (2002). Identity Crisis. XML. com. http://www.xml.com/pub/a/2002/09/11/deviant.html.
Connolly, D, F. Hamelen, I. Horrocks, D, McGuinness, P Patel- Schneider, L. Stein. (2001). Annotated DAML+ OIL Markup. http://www.w3.org/TR/daml+oil-walkthru/.
Costello, R. (2002). XML Schema Tutorial. http://www.xfront. com/#schema.
DCMI. (1999). Dublin Core Qualiers in RDF. http://purl.org/ dc/terms/.
Dean, M., D. Connolly, F. Harmelen, J. Hendler, I. Horrocks, D. McGuinness, P. Patel-Schneider,L. Stein. (2002). Web Ontology Language (OWL) Reference Version 1.0. http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-ref/.
(2009). DC-XML-Guideline.. http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/metadata/dcmi/dc-xml-guidelines/.
Denker, G. (2001). Accessing Information and Services on the DAML- Enabled Web (-). Semantic Web Workshop 2001.
Fallside, D. (2001). XML Schema Part 0: Primer. http://www. w3.org/TR/xmlsch ema-0/.
Garshol, LM. (2004). Metadata? Thesaurus? Texanomies, Topic Maps?: Making sense of it all. http://www.ontopia.net/topicmaps/materials/tm-vs-thesauri.html.
Hawke, Sandro. (2003). Disabiguating RDF Identifier. <http://www.w3.org/2002/12/rdf-identifiers/.
Hickery, T. (2002). Experiments with the IFLA Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR). , -.
International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions. Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records: Final Report. Recommeded by the IFLA Study Group on the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records. UBCIM Publications. 19, -.
Kokkelink, S,Schwanzl, R. (2002). Expressing Qualified Dublin Core in RDF / XML. http://www.dublincore.org/documents/2002/05/15/dcq-rdf-xml.
국립중앙도서관. (2009). KORMARC. 한국문헌자동화목록.. http://www.nl.go.kr/kormarc.
Manola, F, E. Miller. (2002). "RDF Primer. http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-primer.
Miller, E. (1998). An introduction to the Resource Description Framework. http://www.dlib.org/dlib/may98/miller/05miller.html.
(2004). OASIS: Organization for the Advancement of Structured Information Standards. http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/tc_home.php?wg_abbrev=tm-pubsubj.
Pepper, S. (2004). Toward seamless knowledge: integrating public sector portals in Norway (-). XML 2004 Conference and Exposition. Amsterdam.
Pepper, Steve, Schwab, Sylvia. (2003). Curing the Web's Identity Crisis: Subject Indicators for RDF. http://www.ontopia.net/topicmaps/materials/identitycrisis.html>.
Pepper, S. (2002). The XML Papers: Lessons Learned on Applying Topic Maps (-). XML 2002 Conference and Exposition. Baltimore.
Powell, A., H. Wagner, S. Weibel, T. Baker, T. Matola, E. Miller. (2001). Namespace Policy for the Dublin Core Metadata Initiative (DCMI). http://dublincore.org/documents/2001/10/26/dcmi-namespace/.
Powell, A, Johnston, P. (2003). Guidelines for implementing Dublin Core in XML." <http://www.dublincore.org/documents/2003/04/02/dc-xml-guidelines/>. Smith, M., D. McGuinness, R. Volz, and C. Welty. 2002. “Web Ontology Language (OWL) Guide Version 1.0. http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-guide.
Stevens, Roberts. (2003). Building ontologies in DAML + OI. Comparative and Functional Genomics, 4(1), 134-141.
- Downloaded
- Viewed
- 0KCI Citations
- 0WOS Citations