바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

  • P-ISSN1013-0799
  • E-ISSN2586-2073
  • KCI

The Development of Balanced Scorecards Model based on the Strategic Plan of the Rod Library, UNI

Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management / Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, (P)1013-0799; (E)2586-2073
2006, v.23 no.1, pp.159-179
https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2006.23.1.159

Abstract

The University of Northern Iowa Rod Library has mission statement that a personalized learning environment founded on the strong liberal arts curriculum and to supporting an intellectually and culturally diverse community. The Rod Library has been developing the strategic plans by 5 years since 1987. Recently, the strategy has been faced need to measure of performance how much does make it up. This study developed the BSC model and the strategy map that analyze the strategic plan 2004-2009 of the University of Northern Iowa Rod library and transfer the strategy into the four perspectives of BSC. In addition, this study presented the success performance indicators measuring the strategic goals of each perspectives and the cause-effect model driving the lead indicators of performance.

keywords
전략적 계획, 사명, 성과측정, 성과측정시스템, 대학도서관, 균형성과표, 핵심성과측정지표, strategic plan, mission, performance measurement, performance measurement system, BSC, Balanced Scorecards, Rod library, Success Performance Indicator, strategic plan, mission, performance measurement, performance measurement system, BSC, Balanced Scorecards, Rod library, Success Performance Indicator

Reference

1.

Access Services Department. (2005). Goals and objectives 2005-2006. http://rodnet.lib.uni.edu/depts/asd/golas/g2006.htm.

2.

Collection Management and Special Services Department. (2005). Goals and objectives 2005-2006. http://rodnet.lib.uni.edu/depts/cmss/golas/g0506.htm.

3.

Kaplan, Robert S. (1992). The balanced scorecard measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 70(1), 71-79.

4.

Kaplan, Robert S. (1996). Linking the balanced scorecard to strategy. California Management Review, 39(1), 53-79.

5.

Library Administrators Council. (1987). Results of strategic planning sessions:Cedar Falls : Rod Library.

6.

Library Administrators Council. (1989). Library's strategic plan:Cedar Falls : Rod Library.

7.

Library Information Technologies. (2005). Goals and objectives, FY2006. http://rodnet.lib.uni.edu/depts/lit/golas/g2006.shtml.

8.

Library Strategic Planning Committee. (1990). The strategic plan of the Donald O. Rod Library:Cedar Falls : Rod Library.

9.

Library Strategic Planning Committee. (1994). Strategic plan : five years report. Cedar Falls : Rod Library.

10.

Library Strategic Planning Committee. (2000). Rod Library strategic plan 1995-2000:Cedar Falls : Rod Library.

11.

Library Strategic Planning Committee. (2002). Rod Library strategic plan 2001-2006:Cedar Falls : Rod Library.

12.

Library Strategic Planning Committee. (2003). Rod Library strategic plan 2004-2009:Cedar Falls : Rod Library.

13.

Naven, Paul R. (2002). Balanced scorecard step-by-step:New York : John Wiley & Sons.

14.

Peterson, Gerald. (1996). Library facilities and service at UNI, 1876-1907. http://www.library.uni.edu/speccoll/libhist1.html.

15.

Poll, Roswitha. (2001). Performance, process and costs : managing service quality with the balanced scorecard. Library Trends, 49(4), 709-717.

16.

Poll, Roswitha. (2003). Managing service quality with the balanced scorecard. Advances in Library Administration and Organization, 20, 213-227.

17.

Reference and Instructional Services Department. (2005). Goals and objectives 2005-2006. http://rodnet.lib.uni.edu/depts/risd/golas/g2005.htm.

18.

Rod Library. (2005). Rod Library major library-wide or cross-departmental initiatives 2005-2006:Cedar Falls : Rod Library.

19.

Rod Library. (2005). Rod Library strategic plan 2004-2009. http://www.library.uni.edu/libinfo/strplan.shtml.

20.

Self, Jim. (2003). Using data to make choices : the balanced scorecard at the University of Virginia Library. http://www.arl.org/newsltr/230/balscorecard.html.

21.

Self, Jim. (2004). Metrics and management : applying the results of the balanced scorecard. Performance Measurement and Metrics, 5(3), 101-105.

22.

Technical Services Department. (2005). Goals and objectives 2005-2006. http://rodnet.lib.uni.edu/depts/tech/golas/g2006.htm.

23.

University of Virginia Library. (2005). Balanced scorecard at UVa Library. http://www.lib.virginia.edu/bsc/index.html.

24.

Cribb, Gulcin. (2005). Human resource development : impacting on all four perspectives of the balanced scorecard(World Library and Information Congress : 71th IFLA General Conference and Council : Libraries - a voyage of discovery. IFLA). http://www.ifla.org/IV/ifla71/Programme.htm.

Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management