XML documents format on the Web provides a mechanism to impose their content and logical structure information. Therefore, an XML processor provides access to their content and strucure. The purpose of this study is to investigate the usefulness of structural hints in the leaf node language model-based XML document retrieval. In order to this purpose, this experiment tested the performances of the leaf node language model-based XML retrieval system to compare the queries for a topic containing only content-only constraints and both content constrains and structure constraints. A newly designed and implemented leaf node language model-based XML retrieval system was used. And we participated in the ad-hoc track of INEX 2005 and conducted an experiment using a large-scale XML test collection provided by INEX 2005.
(2004). Retrieval Performance of XML document Using Object-Relational Database. 22(2), 189-210.
(2001). XML 문서의 효율적인 구 조검색을 위한 색인모델. 8(D), 451-460.
(2005). 정보검색에서의 언어모델 적용에 관한 분석. 36(2), 49-68.
(2005). XQuery 기반 XML 검 색시스템의 구조적인 질의 검색 성능평가. , 295-304.
(1997). XML representation of a relational database. , -.
(2004). INitiative for the Evaluation of XML Retrieval 2004 homepage. [cited 2006. 10. 28] http://inex.is.informatik.uni-duisburg.de:2004/index.html. , -.
(1999). A Hidden Markov Model Information Retrieval System. , 214-221.
(2003). Language Models and Structured Document Retrieval. , 12-18.
(1998). A Language Modeling Approach to Information Retrieval. , 275-281.
(2002). A Survey in Indexing and Searching XML Document. 53(6), 415-437.
(2004). An Element-Based Approach to Retrieval. , 19-26.
(1999). Making legacy data accessible for XML application. , -.
(2002). Investigating XQuery for Querying Across Database Object Types. 31(2), 28-33.
(2003). Bayesian Extension to the Language Model for Ad Hoc Information Retrieval. , 4-9.
(2001). Document Language Models, Query Models, and Risk Minimization for Information Retrieval. , 111-119.
(2004). A Study of Smoothing Methods for Language Models Applied to Information Retrieval. 22(2), 179-214.