바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

  • P-ISSN1013-0799
  • E-ISSN2586-2073
  • KCI

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.28 No.3

Citation Share

A Study on Using the Role Indicators to Improve the Description Methods of the Statement of Responsibility

Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management / Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, (P)1013-0799; (E)2586-2073
2011, v.28 no.3, pp.65-82
https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2011.28.3.065

(2011). A Study on Using the Role Indicators to Improve the Description Methods of the Statement of Responsibility. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 28(3), 65-82, https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2011.28.3.065

Abstract

Statement of responsibility in bibliographical records plays a key role in clarifying intellectual responsibility of the work, and it also plays a role in making up access points. However, cataloging rules for the statement of responsibility mostly deal with the distinction between the principal role and minor roles. This becomes a problem because the responsibility type itself is more important than the order of the types. For this reason, in this paper I will explore improvements of the description methods of statement of responsibility by organizing the role indicators. Namely, using the role indicators more effectively than the current description methods do, we can collocate the dispersed statements of responsibilities. The role indicators can also be used for an author facet in information retrieval and can provide additional information for authority control.

keywords
role indicator, statement of responsibility, next generation library catalog, relationship designators, author facet, authority control, 역할어, 책임표시, 차세대 도서관 목록, 관계 표시기호, 저자 패싯, 전거제어

Reference

1.

KOLAS3 FAQ. 부출 시 역할어가 제 외되지 않은 채로 부출 처리되어집니다. http://www.kolas3.net/bbs/board.php?bo_table=faq&wr_id=155.

2.

리재철. (1983). 한국문헌정보학의 문제들:구미무역.

3.

구중억. (2007). 차세대 OPAC의 인터페이스와 기능에 관한 연구. 한국비블리아학회지, 18(2), 61-88.

4.

국립중앙도서관. (2006). 한국문헌자동화목록형식: 통합서지용:한국도서관협회.

5.

김태수. (2004). 전거제어활동의 최근 동향연구. 지식처리연구, 5(1), 1-32.

6.

김태수. (2009). 전거레코드 표목의 구조화 연구 - 인명과 단체명 전거레코드의 표목을 중심으로. Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice, 40(3), 1-21.

7.

노지현. (2005). 한국 자료조직 연구의 지적 토대에 관한 고찰. 한국도서관·정보학회지, 36(1), 319-335.

8.

윤정옥. (2010). 차세대 도서관 목록 사례의 고찰. 한국도서관·정보학회지, 41(1), 5-28.

9.

이경호. (2009). KORMARC 245필드 입력형식의 문제점과 개선 방안 - MARC 21의 입력설계 원칙에 근거하여. 한국도서관·정보학회지, 40(1), 181-207.

10.

이명규. (1999). OPAC에서의 AACR2R문제 고찰. 정보관리학회지, 16(1), 119-136.

11.

정옥경. (2000). 한국편목규칙의 표목부에 관한 연구. 한국문헌정보학회지, 34(2), 135-157.

12.

한국도서관협회 목록위원회. (2003). 한국목록규칙:한국도서관협회.

13.

American Library Association. (2002). Anglo-American Cataloging Rules:American Library Association.

14.

Breeding, Marshall. (2010). Next-gen Library Catalogs:Neal-Schuman Publishers, Inc.

15.

British Museum. (1936). Rules for Compiling the Catalogues of Printed Books, Maps, and Music in the British Museum:British Museum.

16.

British Museum. (1841). Catalogue of Printed Books in the British Museum, vol.1:British Museum.

17.

Burrows, Suzetta. (2011). Trends in authorship order in biomedical research publications. Journal of Electronic Resources in Medical Libraries, 8(2), 155-168.

18.

Costas, Rodrigo. (2011). Do age and professional rank influence the order of authorship in scientific publications? Some evidence from a micro-level perspective. Scientometrics, 88(1), 145-161.

19.

Cutter, Charles A. (1904). Rules for a Dictionary Catalog:Govt. print. off.

20.

Dunkin, Paul S. (1961). Guesstimates unlimited: The draft code in imagined operation. Library Resources Technical Services, 5(3), 179-185.

21.

Harris, Kay. (1957). The divided catalog, a reappraisal. Library Resources Technical Services, 1(1), 21-30.

22.

Howarth, C. Lynne. (2008). Enigma variations: Rarsing the riddle of main entry and the "Rule of Three" from AACR2 to RDA. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 46(2), 201-220.

23.

IFLA Study Group on FRBR. (2009). Functional Requirement for Bibliographical Records. Final Report. IFLA.

24.

Joint Steering Committee for Development of RDA(JSC). RDA: Resource Description and Access. http://access.rdatoolkit.org/.

25.

Lehnus, Donald J. (1967). A Comparison of Panizzi's 91 Rules and the AACR of 1967:University of Illinois Graduate School of Library Science.

26.

Mukhopadhyay, Asoknath. (2007). Guide to MARC 21 for Cataloging Books and Serials with Functional Definitions, Examples and Working Resources:Chandos Publishing.

27.

NFAIS. (1998). The rights and responsibilities of content creators, providers, and users. NFAIS.

28.

Suljak, Nedjelko D. (1971). Copyright and the question of authorship. Library Resources and Technical Services, 15(4), 513-521.

Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management

e-Submission OA Policy