바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
 

logo

심리적 거리가 소비자의 온라인 구전 정보 수용에 미치는 영향

The Effects of Psychological Distance on Consumer Response to eWOM

초록

당장 필요한 상품을 구매하려 정보를 탐색할 때와, 미래에 필요한 상품을 구매하려 정보를 탐색할 때 시간의 효과에 따라 구전 정보의 영향력은 달라질 수 있다. 본 연구에서는 구매와의 시간적 거리에 따라 소비자의 정보 수용이 어떻게 달라지는지를 해석수준이론을 바탕으로 분석하여 구전 커뮤니케이션에서 심리학적 측면들이 의미 있게 활용될 수 있는 방향을 고찰해보고자 하였다. 해석수준에 대한 선행연구를 통해 구매와의 시간적 거리와 구전 정보원과의 사회적 거리가 매칭 될 때 구전이 더 효과적일 것이라 예상할 수 있다. 이에 페이스북 친구를 사회적 거리가 가까운 구전 정보원으로, 블로거를 사회적 거리가 먼 정보원으로 설정하고, 구매와의 시간적 거리와 소비자가 구전 정보원에 느끼는 사회적 거리가 소비자의 정보 수용에 어떠한 영향을 미치는지를 살펴보았다.

keywords
eWOM, Social media, Psychological distance, Construal level theory, 온라인구전, 소셜미디어, 심리적 거리, 해석수준이론

Abstract

Decision making can be differed by the time effect, for example, a difference is shown between information seeking for the product you need right away, and information seeking for the product needed in the future. Based on the construal level theory, it can be expected that eWOM(electronic word of mouth) would be more effective, when the temporal distance between the purchase matches the social distance between the eWOM informants. Distinguishing Facebook friends as eWOM informants with a close social distance and bloggers as eWOM informants with a far social distance, this study examined how the temporal distance between the purchase and the social distance between the eWOM sources affect the choice of the consumer.

keywords
eWOM, Social media, Psychological distance, Construal level theory

참고문헌

1.

김창호, 황의록. (1997). 구전정보의 특성과 구전효과의 관계. 광고연구, 여름호. 55-77.

2.

닐슨코리아. (2011). 하반기 광고유형별 신뢰도 조사.

3.

이진희, 도선재, 황장선. (2011). 제품 관련 온라인 구전(e-WOM)의 효과: 방향성, 유용성, 상호작용 성향(IR)의 역할. 한국심리학회지: 소비자․광고, 12(2), 283-307.

4.

Bar-Anan, Y. Liberman, N. & Trope, Y. (2006). The association between psychological distance and construal level: evidence from an implicit association test. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135(4), 609.

5.

Bickart, B. & Schindler, R. M. (2002). Expanding the Schope of Word of Mouth. Advances in consumer research, 9, 428-430.

6.

Bussiere, D. (2000). Evidence and implications of electronic word-of-mouth. Developments in marketing science. 23: 361-361.

7.

Chatterjee, P. (2001). Online reviews: do consumers use them?. Advances in consumer research, 28, 129-133.

8.

Cheung, M. Y. Luo, C. Sia, C. L. & Chen, H. (2009). Credibility of electronic word-of-mouth, International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 13, 9-38.

9.

Duhan, D. F. Johnson, S. D. Wilcox, J. B. & Harrel, G. D. (1997). Influences on consumer use of word-of-mouth recommendation sources. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 25(4), 283-295.

10.

Dhar, R. & Kim, E. Y. (2007). Seeing the forest or the trees: Implications of construal level theory for consumer choice. Journal of Consumer Psychology. 17(2), 96-100.

11.

Doh, S. J., & Hwang, J. S., (2009). How consumers evaluate eWOM messages, Cyber psychology & Behavior, 12(2), 193-197.

12.

Eyal, T. Sagristano M. D. Trope, Y. Liberman, N. Chaiken, S. (2009). When values matter: Expressing values in behavioral intentions for the near vs. distant future. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 45. 35-43.

13.

Fiedler, K. Jung, J. Wanke, M. & Alexopoulos, T. (2012). On the relations between distinct aspects of psychological distance: An ecological basis of construal-level theory, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology.

14.

Fujita, K. & Han, H. A. (2009). Moving beyond deliberative control of impulses. Psychological Science, 20(7), 799-804.

15.

Harrison-Walker, L. J. (2001). The measurement of word-of-mouth communication and an investigation of service quality and customer commitment as potential antecedents, Journal of Service Research, 4(1), 60-75.

16.

Hoffman, D. & Novak, T. (1997). A new marketing paradigm for electronic commerce, Information Society, 13(1), 43-54.

17.

Holbrook, M. B. & Batra, R. (1987). Assessing the role of emotions as mediators of consumer responses to advertising, Journal of consumer research, 404-420.

18.

Hovland, C. I. & Weiss, W. (1951). The influence of source credibility on communication effectiveness. Public Opinion Quarterly, 15, 635- 650.

19.

Kim, Zhang, & Li, (2008). Effects of Temporal and Social Distance on Consumer Evaluations, Journal of Consumer Research, 35(4), 706-713.

20.

Libby, L. K. & Eibach, R. P. (2002). Looking back in time: Self-concept change affects visual perspective in autobiographical memory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 167-179.

21.

Liberman, N. Trope, Y. McCrea, S. M. & Sherman, S. J. (2007). The effect of level of construal on the temporal distance of activity enactment. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43(1), 143-149.

22.

Liviatan, I. Trope, Y. & Liberman, N. (2008). The effect of similarity on mental construal. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 1256-1269.

23.

McKnight, D. H. & Kacmar, C. (2006). Factors of information credibility for an Internet advice site. In Sprague R. H. Proceedings of the 39th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. IEEE Computer Society Press.

24.

Okleshen C. & Grossbart, S. (1998). Usenet groups, virtual community and consumer behaviors. Advances in Consumer Research, 25(1), 276-282.

25.

Steffes E. M. & Burgee, L. E. (2009). Social ties and online word of mouth, Internet Research, 19(1), 42-59

26.

Thurau, T. H. Gwinner, K. P. Walsh, G. & Gremler, D. D. (2004). Electronic Word of Mouth Via Consumer Opinion Platforms. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18(1), 38-52.

27.

Trope, Y. & Liberman, N. (2000) Temporal construal and time-dependent changes in preference. Journal of personality and social psychology, 79(6), 876-889.

28.

Trope, Y. & Liberman, N. (2003). Temporal Construal. Psychological Review, 110(3), 403- 421.

29.

Trope, Y. & Liberman, N. (2010). Construal-Level Theory of Psychological Distance. Psychological Review, 117(2), 440-463.

30.

Valenzuela, S. Park N. & Kee, K. F. (2009), Is there social capital in a social network site? Facebook use and college students’ life satisfaction, trust, and participation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14(4), 875-901.

31.

White, K. MacDonnell, R. & Dahl, D. W. (2011). It’s the Mind-Set that Matters. Journal of Marketing Research. XLVIII, 472-485.

32.

Wirtz, J. & Chew, P. (2002). The effects of incentives, deal proneness, satisfaction and tie strength on word-of-mouth behaviour. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 13(2), 141-162.

33.

Wright et al., (2012). Construal-level mind-sets and the perceived validity of marketing claims. Marketing Letters, 23(1), 253-261.

34.

Zeithaml, V. A. Berry, L. L. & Parasuraman, A. (1996). The behavioral consequences of service quality. The Journal of Marketing, 31-46.

35.

Zhao & Xie, (2011). Effects of Social and Temporal Distance on Consumers’ Responses to Peer Recommendations. Journal of Marketing Research, 48, 486-496.

36.

Zsolnai, L. (1998). Rational Choiceand the Diversity of Choices, Journal of Socio-Economics, 27(5), 613-622.

logo