open access
메뉴.png){kind=logo}
open access
메뉴
ISSN : 1229-8778
This study was designed to provide insights regarding the effects of incongruent brand extension(IE), mental simulation(MS), and comparative advertising frame(CF) on purchase intention(PI). Firstly, we examined purchase intension(PI) in two types of mental simulation(outcome-focused simulation(OF) and process-focused simulation(PF)) on the extent of brand extension incongruity and we found that outcome-focused mental simulation(OF) was more effective than process-focused mental simulation(PF) in the high incongruent brand extension, but we could not find a significant difference between mental simulation(MSs) for moderate incongruent extension. Secondly, we examined purchase intension(PI) in two types of comparative advertising frame(maximal frame(Max) and minimal frame(Mini)) on the extent of incongruent brand extension. There was no significant difference between comparative advertising frame (CFs) for high brand incongruent extension(IE) and moderate brand incongruent extension(IE) respectively. Thirdly, we examined purchase intension(PI) in two types of comparative advertising frame on the types of mental simulation. we found that maximal frame was more effective than minimal frame in outcome -focused mental simulation but we could not find a significant difference between comparative advertising frame(CFs) for process-focused mental simulation. Finally, according to whether brand incongruent extension(IE) was high or moderate, We found that the optimum advertising strategy between the types of mental simulation and comparative advertising frame was when it was operated by maximum comparative advertising appeal in outcome-forced mental simulation with high brand incongruent extension.
김경민, 나준희 (2006). 모브랜드에 대한 지식이 브랜드 확장에 대한 평가에 미치는 영향. 소비문화연구, 9(1), 45-60.
김재휘, 조희은, 부수현 (2007). 비교 광고의 효과연구: 메시지 유형과 정서가 소비자의 인지구조에 미치는 영향. 광고학연구, 18(5), 39-54.
손용석, 이성학 (2010). 브랜드신뢰가 비유사확장제품 평가에 미치는영향. 소비자학연구, 21(3), 243-262.
송환웅, 여준상 (2009). 유명인 광고모델 중복출연이 소비자태도에 미치는 영향: 적합성의 조절효과. 광고학연구, 20(6), 205- 221.
심성욱 (2004). 브랜드 확장에서의 광고효과: 모 제품과 확장 제품간의 연결성 연구. 광고학연구, 15(5), 131-151.
안광호, 이견 (2006). 모 브랜드 이미지와 소비자 자아이미지의 일치성이 브랜드 확장제품에 대한 소비자 태도에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구. 마케팅관리연구, 11(3), 85-103.
이병관, 안은미 (2010). 시간적 거리감 (Temporal Distance) 이 비교 광고 제품에 대한 태도와 구매의도에 미치는 효과 연구. 한국심리학회지: 소비자, 광고, 11(1), 117-135.
이병관 (2011). 소비자의 정신적 조작과 시간적 거리감이 비교 광고에서 제품 태도와 행동의도에 미치는 효과 연구. 광고학연구, 22(2), 129-151.
이화연, 문철주 (2008). 부적합 브랜드 확장 시 광고유형이 소비자평가에 미치는 효과: 부적합 확장의 수준과 자아일치성을 중심으로. 광고학연구, 19(2), 127-151.
전성률, 허종호, 유병선 (2006). 비순차적 상향라인확장에 따른 소비자의 브랜드 범주 지각에 관한 연구. 소비자학연구, 17(3), 103-117.
전성률, 허종호, 장소희 (2007). 연구논문: 비유사 확장시 브랜드확장 유형이 목표확장제품의 평가에 미치는 효과: 브랜드 컨셉과 목표확장제품 가격의 조절적 역할을 중심으로. ASIA MARKETING JOURNAL (구 한국마케팅저널), 9(3), 1-32.
전홍식, 부이응옥증 (2011). 소비자 혁신 저항, 사전지식 및 광고유형이 광고태도와 구매의도에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지 소비자, 광고, 12(1), 71-99.
차유철 (2003). 광고가 부적합 확장에 미치는 영향 연구. 광고학연구, 14(2), 119-140.
허종호, 주태욱 (2005). 수직적 브랜드 확장시 확장제품의 광고유형에 따른 소비자의 확장제품평가에 관한 연구. 광고학연구, 16(1), 95-118.
Aaker, D. A. (1991). Managing brand equity: Capitalising on the value of a brand name, New York.
Aaker, D. A., & Keller, K. L. (1990). Consumer evaluations of brand extensions, The Journal of Marketing, 27-41.
Alba, J. W., & Hutchinson, J. W. (1987). Dimensions of consumer expertise, Journal of consumer research, 411-454.
Barone, M. J., Miniard, P. W., & Romeo, J. B. (2000). The influence of positive mood on brand extension evaluations, Journal of consumer Research, 26(4), 386-400.
Bhat, S., & Reddy, S. K. (1998). Symbolic and functional positioning of brands, Journal of consumer marketing, 15(1), 32-43.
Bottomley, P. A., & Holden, S. S. (2001). Do we really know how consumers evaluate brand extensions? Empirical generalizations based on secondary analysis of eight studies. Journal of Marketing Research, 38(4), 494-500.
Boush, D. M., & Loken, B. (1991). A process- tracing study of brand extension evaluation, Journal of Marketing research, 16-28.
Broniarczyk, S. M., & Alba, J. W. (1994). The importance of the brand in brand extension, Journal of marketing research, 214-228.
Buchanan, B., & Smithies, R. H. (1989). Substantiating a parity position, Journal of Advertising Research, 29(5), 9-20.
Castaño, R., Sujan, M., Kacker, M., & Sujan, H. (2008). Managing Uncertainty in the Adoption of New Products: Temporal Distance and Mental Simulation, Journal of Marketing Research, 45, 320-336.
Droge, Cornelia and Rene Y. Darmon (1987). Associative Position-ing Strategies through Comparative Advertising: Attribute versus Overall Similarity Approaches, Journal of Marketing Research, 24, 377-388.
Escalas, J. E. (2004). Imagine yourself in the product: Mental simulation, narrative transportation, and persuasion, Journal of Advertising, 33(2), 37-48.
Escalas, J. E., & Luce, M. F. (2003). Process versus outcome thought focus and advertising, Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13(3), 246-254.
Escalas, J. E., & Luce, M. F. (2004). Understanding the Effects of Process Focused versus Outcome‐Focused Thought in Response to Advertising, Journal of Consumer Research, 31(2), 274-285.
Farquhar, Peter H. (1989). Managing Brand Equity, Marketing Research, 1(September), 24-33.
Farquhar, P. H., J. Y., Herr, P. M., & Ijiri, Y. (1992). Strategies for leveraging master brands. Marketing Research, 4, 32-32.
Fiske, S. T., & Pavelchak, M. A. (1986). Category-based versus piecemeal-based affective responses: Developments in schema-triggered affect, Handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behavior, 1, 167-203.
Gourville, John T. (1998). Pennies-a-Day: The Effect of Temporal Reframing on Transaction Evaluation, Journal of Consumer Research, 24, 395-408.
Gotlieb, J. B., & Sarel, D. (1991). Comparative advertising effectiveness: The role of involvement and source credibility, Journal of Advertising, 38-45.
Green, S., Marquis, B., Hershberger, J. G., Thompson, S. L., & McCollum, K. (1999). The Over-parametized Analysis-of-variance Model, Psychological Methods, 4, 214-233.
Grewal, D., Kavanoor, S., Fern, E. F., Costley, C., & Barnes, J. (1997). Comparative versus noncomparative advertising: a meta-analysis, The Journal of Marketing, 1-15.
Iyer, E. S. (1988). The influence of verbal content and relative newness on the effectiveness of comparative advertising, Journal of Advertising, 15-21.
Jackson Jr, D. W., Brown, S. W., & Harmon, R. R. (1979). Comparative magazine advertisements, Journal of Advertising research, 19(6), 21-26.
Jain, S. P., Agrawal, N., & Maheswaran, D. (2006). When more may be less: The effects of regulatory focus on responses to different comparative frames. Journal of Consumer Research, 33(1), 91-98.
John, D. R., Loken, B., & Joiner, C. (1998). The negative impact of extensions: can flagship products be diluted?, The Journal of Marketing, 19-32.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk, Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 263-291.
Keller, K. L., & Aaker, D. A. (1992). The effects of sequential introduction of brand extensions, Journal of marketing research, 35-50.
Kisielius, J., & Sternthal, B. (1984). Detecting and explaining vividness eff ects in attitudinal judgments. Journal of Marketing Research, 21, 54-64.
Klink, R. R., & Smith, D. C. (2001). Threats to the external validity of brand extension research, Journal of marketing research, 326-335.
Krishnamurthy, P., & Sujan, M. (1999). Retrospection versus anticipation: The role of the ad under retrospective and anticipatory self-referencing, Journal of Consumer Research, 26(1), 55-69.
Lane, V. R. (2000). The impact of ad repetition and ad content on consumer perceptions of incongruent extensions, The Journal of Marketing, 80-91.
Lee, A. Y., & Aaker, J. L. (2004). Bringing the Frame into Focus: The Influence of Regulatory Fit on Processing Fluency and Persuasion, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 205-218
Lee, A. Y., Keller, P. A., & Sternthal, B. (2010). Value from regulatory construal fit: The persuasive impact of fit between consumer goals and message concreteness, Journal of Consumer Research, 36(5), 735-747.
Leuthesser, Lance, ed. (1988), Defining, Measuring and Managing Brand Equity: A Conference Summary, Report #88-104. Cambridge, MA: Marketing Science Institute
Levine, P. (1976), Commercials that Name Competing Brands, Journal of Advertising Research, 16, 7-14.
Maoz, E., & Tybout, A. M. (2002). The moderating role of involvement and differentiation in the evaluation of brand extensions, Journal of Consumer Psychology, 12(2), 119-131.
Meyers-Levy, J., Louie, T. A., & Curren, M. T. (1994). How does the congruity of brand names affect evaluations of brand name extensions?, Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(1), 46-53.
Meyvis, T., Goldsmith, K., & Dhar, R. (2012). The Importance of the Context in Brand Extension: How Pictures and Comparisons Shift Consumers'Focus from Fit to Quality, Journal of Marketing Research, 49(2), 206-217.
Murphy, J. H., & Amundsen, M. S. (1981). The Communications: Effectiveness of Comparative Advertising for a New Brand on Users of the Dominant Brand, Journal of Advertising, 14-48.
Muthukrishnan, A. V., & Weitz, B. A. (1991). Role of product knowledge in evaluation of brand extension, Advances in consumer research, 18(1), 407-413.
Nan, X. (2006). Affective cues and brand extension evaluation: Exploring the influence of attitude toward the parent brand and attitude toward the extension ad, Psychology & Marketing, 23(7), 597-616.
Oettingen, G. (1996). Positive fantasy and motivation. In P. M. Gollwitzer & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), The psychology of action: Linking cognition and motivation to behavior (pp.236-259). New York: Guilford Press.
Oettingen, G., & Mayer, D. (2002). The motivating function of thinking about the future: Expectations versus fantasies, Journal of personality and social psychology, 83(5), 1198- 1212.
Oettingen, G., & Wadden, T. A. (1991). Expectation, fantasy, and weight loss: Is the impact of positive thinking always positive?, Cognitive Therapy and Research, 15, 167-175.
Park, C. W., Milberg, S., & Lawson, R. (1991). Evaluation of brand extensions: the role of product feature similarity and brand concept consistency, Journal of consumer research, 185- 193.
Park, J. W., Kim, K. H., & Kim, J. (2002). Acceptance of brand extensions: interactive influences of product category similarity, typicality of claimed benefits, and brand relationship quality, Advances in consumer research, 29(1), 190-198.
Pechmann, C., & Stewart, D. W. (1990). The effects of comparative advertising on attention, memory, and purchase intentions, Journal of Consumer Research, 180-191.
Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Pham, L. B., & Taylor, S. E. (1999). From thought to action: Effects of process-versus outcome-based mental simulations on performance, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(2), 250-260.
Putrevu, S., & Lord, K. R. (1994). Comparative and noncomparative advertising: attitudinal effects under cognitive and affective involvement conditions, Journal of Advertising, 77-91.
Shimp, T. A., & Dyer, D. C. (1978). The effects of comparative advertising mediated by market position of sponsoring brand, Journal of Advertising, 13-19.
Sujan, M. (1985). Consumer knowledge: Effects on evaluation strategies mediating consumer judgments, Journal of Consumer Research, 31-46.
Tauber, E. M. (1988). Brand leverage: strategy for growth in a cost-control world, Journal of Advertising Research, 28(4), 26-30.
Taylor, S. E., & Schneider, S. K. (1989). Coping and the simulation of events, Social cognition, 7(2), 174-194.
Taylor, S. E., Pham, L. B., Rivkin, I. D., & Armor, D. A. (1998). Harnessing the imagination: Mental simulation, self-regulation and coping, American Psychologist, 53, 429-439.
Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2003). Temporal construal, Psychological review, 110(3), 403.
Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2010). Construal-level theory of psychological distance, Psychological review, 117(2), 440.
Wilkie, W. L., & Farris, P. W. (1975). Comparison advertising: Problems and potential, The Journal of Marketing, 7-15.
Yeo, J., & Park, J. (2006). Effects of parent- extension similarity and self regulatory focus on evaluations of brand extensions, Journal of Consumer Psychology, 16(3), 272-282.
Zhao, M., Hoeffler, S., & Zauberman, G. (2007). Mental simulation and preference consistency over time: The role of process-versus outcome-focused thoughts, Journal of Marketing Research, 379-388.