바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

소비자들은 쇼핑환경에 어떻게 반응하는가? : 쇼핑일치이론의 제안

How Do Consumers Respond to Shopping Environments?:Proposing the Theory of Shopping Congruence

초록

목표와 환경의 상호작용에 의한 패턴추구에 대해 문헌들에서 많이 보고되어 왔으나, 쇼핑 패턴에 대한 명확한 연구들이 거의 존재하지 않는다. 이러한 연구의 부족을 인식하고, 인지연속체이론을 쇼핑 맥락에서 이론적 기반으로 한 본 연구는 새로운 이론, “쇼핑 일치”를 처음으로 제안한다. 본 이론은 쇼핑과제를 기반으로 사람들이 어떻게 쇼핑환경에 반응하는가를 설명한다. 본 연구는 실험적 필드조사에 의해 실제 상점 상황에서 쇼핑과제와 쇼핑환경 간의 쇼핑 일치가 해당 브랜드의 지각, 태도 및 구매의도에 미치는 영향에 대해 실증적 연구하였다. 가설과 일치하게, ANOVA 결과는 쇼핑과제의 의해 쇼핑환경의 영향을 받아 브랜드의 지각, 태도 및 구매의도에 영향을 미치는 것으로 나왔다. 가설과 같이, 본 연구결과는 관련 브랜드에 대한 인지적, 직관적 지각과 인지적 태도, 및 구매의도에 미치는 쇼핑일치의 영향을 확증하였다. 그러나, 감정적 태도에 미치는 쇼핑일치의 영향은 가설과 달리 미치지 않는 것으로 나타났다. 이 연구는 새로운 쇼핑이론으로, 패턴 추구 쇼핑행동인 쇼칭일치이론을 처음으로 제안하였다는 점에서 이론적으로 의미가 있다. 본 쇼핑일치이론은 쇼핑행동을 예측할 수 있고 마케터를 위한 관리적 적용의 방향성을 제시했다는 점에서 실무적으로 의미가 있다.

keywords
쇼핑일치이론, 인지연속체이론, 쇼핑과제, 쇼핑환경, Shopping Congruence Theory, Cognitive Continuum Theory, shopping tasks, shopping environment

Abstract

The pattern seeking by the interaction between goals and environments has been heavily reported in the literature, but studies about clearly investigating about the shopping pattern behaviors rarely exist. Recognizing the lack of the study, this study initially proposes a new theory, “shopping congruence” by using the Cognitive Continuum Theory (CCT) as a theoretical framework in the shopping context. Based on their shopping tasks, the theory explains how people react to shopping environments. The research empirically tested the impact of shopping congruence between shopping tasks and shopping environments on related brand’s perceptions, attitudes and purchase intentions in an actual store situation by experimental field research. Like the hypotheses, the ANOVA result found that there was a tendency of congruence on perception, attitude, and purchase intention toward store environments by shopping tasks. The results of the study assured the impact of shopping congruence on both cognitive and intuitive perceptions, on cognitive attitudes, and on purchase intentions toward brands in stores. However, unlike the proposed hypothesis, the impact of shopping congruence does not influence affective attitudes toward stores. This study is theoretically meaningful in that it initially proses a new shopping theory, shopping congruence, which is an adaptive theory about pattern-seeking shopping behaviors. The theory of shopping congruence is practically meaningful in that it provides a possibility to estimate shopper behaviors and managerial implication directions for marketers.

keywords
Shopping Congruence Theory, Cognitive Continuum Theory, shopping tasks, shopping environment

참고문헌

1.

Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). “Prediction of goal directed behavior: attitude, intentions, and perceived behavioral control,” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22 (September), 453-474.

2.

Babin, B. J., & Darden, W. R. (1995). “Consumer self-regulation in a retail environment,” Journal of Retailing, 71(1), 47-71.

3.

Babin, B. J., Darden, W. R., & Griffin, M. (1994). “Work and /or fun: measuring hedonic and utilitarian shopping value,” Journal of Consumer Research, 20(March), 644-656.

4.

Babin, B. J., Hardesty, D. M., & Suter, T. A. (2003). “Color and shopping intentions: the intervening effect of price fairness and perceived affect,” Journal of Business Research, 56(7), 541-551.

5.

Baker, Julie, Parasuraman, A., Grewal, Dhruv, & Voss, Glenn B. (2002). “The influence of multiple store environment cues on perceived merchandise value and patronage intentions,” Journal of Marketing, 66(2), 120-141.

6.

Berger, J., & Fitzsimons, G. (2008). “Dogs on the street, pumas on your feet: how cues in the environment influence product evaluation and choice,” Journal of Marketing Research, 45 (February), 1-14.

7.

Bitner, M. J. (1990). Evaluating service encounters: the effects of physical surroundings and employee responses. Journal of Marketing, 54 (2), 69-82.

8.

Bower, G. H., & Cohen, P. R. (1982). “Emotional influences in memory and thinking: data and theory”, In M. S. Clark & S. T. Fiske (eds.), “Affect and cognition,” Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 291-331.

9.

Campbell, D., & J. Stanley. (1963). “Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs,” Chicago: Rand McNally.

10.

Cervellon, M.-C., & Dube, L. (2002). “Assessing the cross-cultural applicability of affective and cognitive components of attitude,” Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33(3), 346-357.

11.

Chartrand, T. L., & Bargh, J. A. (2002). Nonconscious motivations: Their activation, operation, and consequences. In A. Tesser, D. Stapel, & J. Wood (Eds.), Self and Motivation: Emerging Psychological Perspectives (pp. 13-41). Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association Press.

12.

Choi, E. J. (2014). “MCM of Sung Joo Group: An MCM Licensee Wrote a Creation Myth in the Luxury Industry,” Asian Case Research Journal, 18(2), 227-316.

13.

Clark, M., & Isen, A. M. (1982). “Toward understanding the relationship between feeling states and social behavior”, in Hastorf, A. H. and Isen, A. H. (eds), “Cognitive Social Psychology,” Elsevier/North Holland, New York, NY, 73-108.

14.

Crites, S. L., Fabrigar, L. R., & Petty, R. E. (1994). “Measuring the affective and cognitive properties of attitudes: conceptual and methodological issues,” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20(6), pp.619-634.

15.

Darden, W. R., & Babin, B. J. (1994). “Exploring the affective quality of retail environments: expanding the scope of retail personality,” Journal of Business Research, 24(2), 101-109.

16.

Dhar, Ravi and Wertenbroch, Klaus (2000). “Consumer choice between hedonic and utilitarian goods,” Journal of Marketing Research, 37(1), 60-71.

17.

Doherty, M., & Kurz, E. M. (1996). “Social judgment theory,” Thinking and Reasoning, 2 (2/3), 109-140.

18.

Eroglu, S., & Machleit, K. (1990). “An Empirical Study of Retail Crowding: Antecedents and Consequences,” Journal of Retailing, 62(4), 346-363.

19.

Estrada, C. A., Young, M. J., & Isen, A. M. (1992). “Positive affect influences reported source of practice satisfaction in physicians,” Clinical Research, 40(3), 768.

20.

Fiore, A. M., Yan, X., & Yoh, E. (2000). “Effects of product display and environmental fragrancing on approach responses towards a product and pleasurable experiences,” Psychology and Marketing, 17(1), 27-54.

21.

Fiske, S. T., & Neuberg, S. L. (1990). “A continuum of impression formation, from category-based to individuating process: influences of information and motivation on attention and interpretation,” In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 23 ed. Mark P. Zanna, New York: Academic Press, 1-74.

22.

Gibson, J. J. (1979). An Eological Approach to Visual Perception. Booston: Houghton Mifflin.

23.

Hammond, K. R. (1988). “Judgment and decision making in dynamic tasks,” Information and Decision Technologies, 14(March), 3-14.

24.

Hammond, K. R. (2000). “Judgments under Stress,” New York: Oxford University Press.

25.

Hammond, K. R., Hamm, R. M., Grassia, J., & Person, T. (1987). “Direct comparison of the efficacy of intuitive and analytic cognition in expert judgment”, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man & Cybernetics, 17 (September-October), 753-770.

26.

Hoffman, Donna L. and Novak, Thomas P. (1996). “Marketing in Hypermedia Computer-Mediated Environments: Conceptual Foundations,” Journal of Marketing, 60(3), 50-68.

27.

Isen, A. M. (1997). “Positive affect and decision making,” In Goldstein, W. M., & Hogarth, R. M. (Eds.), Research on Judgment and Decision Making: Currents, Connections, and Controversies, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 509- 534.

28.

Kaltcheva, Velitchka D. and Weitz, Barton A. (2006). “When should a retailer create an exciting store environment?,” Journal of Marketing, 70(1), 107-118.

29.

Mathwick, C., Malhotra, N. K., & Rigdon, E. (2002). “The effect of dynamic retail experiences on experiential perceptions of value: an Internet and catalog comparison,” Journal of Retailing, 78(1), 51-60.

30.

Mathwick, C., & Rigdon, E. (2004). “Play, flow, and the online search experience,” Journal of Consumer Research, 31, 324-332.

31.

Mantel, Susan Powell and Kardes, Frank R. (1999). “The Role of Direction of Comparison, Attribute-Based Processing, and Attitude-Based Processing in Consumer Preference,” Journal of Consumer Research, 25(4), 335-352.

32.

Menon, S., & Kahn, B. (2002). “Cross-category effects of induced arousal and pleasure on the Internet shopping experience,” Journal of Retailing, 78(1), 31-40.

33.

Mitchell, Vince W. (2001). “Re-conceptualizing consumer store image processing using perceived risk,” Journal of Business Research, 54, 167-172.

34.

Moye, L. N., & Kincade, D. H. (2002). “Influence of usage situations and consumer shopping orientations on the importance of the retail store environment”, International Review of Retail, Distribution, and Consumer Research, 12 (1), 59-79.

35.

Kumar, V. and Karande, K (2000). “The Effect of Retail Store Environment on Retailer Performance,” Journal of Business Research, 49(2), 167-181.

36.

Petty, R. E., Wegener, D. T., & Fabrigar, L. R. (1997). “Attitudes and attitude change,” Annual Review of Psychology, 48, 609-647.

37.

Shah, James Y., Friedman, Ron, & Kruglanski, Arie W. (2002). “Forgetting all else: On the antecedents and consequences of goal shielding,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(6), 1261-1280.

38.

Spangenberg, E. R., Crowley, A. E., & Henderson, P. W. (1996). “Improving the store environment: do olfactory cues affect evaluations and behaviors?,” Journal of Marketing, 60(April), 67-80.

39.

Suri, R., Long, M., & Monroe, K. B. (2003). “The impact of the Internet and consumer motivation on evaluation of price,” Journal of Business Research, 56, 379-390.

40.

Vrechopoulos, A. P., O’Keefe, R. M., Doukidis, G. I., & Siomkos, G. J. (2004). “Virtual store layout: an experimental comparison in the context of grocery retail,” Journal of Retailing, 80(1), 13-22.

41.

Wakefield, K. L., & Baker, J. (1998). “Excitement at the mall: determinants and effects on shopping response,” Journal of Retailing, 74(4), 515-540.

42.

Wood, W. (2000). “Attitude change: persuasion and social influence,” Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 539-570.

43.

Zimiles, H. (1981). “Cognitive and affective growth: developmental interaction,” In E. K. Shapiro, E. K., & Weber, E. (eds.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers: Hillsdale, New Jersey.

logo