바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

The Effect of Metaphoric Message on Perceived Instrumentality in the Means-Goal Relationship

Abstract

This study examined how metaphoric expression moderates the effect of means-goal relationship on perceived instrumentality. According to previous studies, a single means to pursue a single goal is perceived to be more effective to achieve the goal, while a means to pursue multiple goals is perceived to be less effective. This is called the dilution effect, and it is mediated by the association strength between means and goals (Zhang, Fishbach, and Kruglanski, 2007). This study applies this idea to a marketing communication such as print ad. We manipulated the number of goals (outcome of product) achieved by a single means (product), then investigated the effect of the goal number on perceived instrumentality. In particular, we focus on how influence may vary by exposure to the metaphorical message. We hypothesize that, consistent with the dilution effect, when a metaphorical sentence is presented before ad evaluation, consumers feel that unifinal means are more effective than multifinal means due to perceived relational similarity, while when a declarative sentence is presented before ad evaluation, the effect is reversed. In Experiment 1, using a print ad for a fitness program as a stimulus, we explored the interaction effect between metaphoric message and number of goals. The results supported hypothesis 1. Study 2 replicates the results of study 1 using a different stimulus (i.e., print ad for a ball-point pen) and a different dependent variable (i.e., willingness to pay). Further, the results show that the observed effect is mediated by the increase in perceived instrumentality of the means. This research contributes to the means-goal literature by providing novel evidence for the moderating role of metaphorical message on instrumentality perception in a unifinal vs. multifinal means situation. Further, our research offers practitioners important insights into designing the details of effective marketing communication.

keywords
means-goal association, dilution model, perceived instrumentality, metaphoric message, relational similarity

Reference

1.

김경진 (2009). 소비자의 제품평가에 대한 은유메시지 효과 모형. 고려대학교 대학원 박사학위논문.

2.

김재휘, 권나진 (2013). 자기조절모드와 수단의 대체가능성 수준이 목표행동의 개시에 미치는 효과: 장기적 목표행동을 중심으로. 한국소비자학회, 춘계학술대회논문집, 5, 180-187.

3.

Allbritton, D. W., McKoon, G., & Gerrig, R. J. (1995). Metaphor-based schemas and text representations: Making connections through conceptual metaphors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21(3), 612-625.

4.

Avnet, T., & Higgins, E. T.(2003). Locomotion, assessment, and regulatory fit: Value transfer from “how” to “what”. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 525-530.

5.

Bargh, J. A., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (1994). Environmental control of goal-directed action: automatic and strategic contingencies between situations and behavior.

6.

Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator? mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.

7.

Cantor, N., & Langston, C. A. (1989). Ups and downs of life tasks in a life transition.

8.

Chun, W. Y., Kruglanski, A. W., Friedman, R., & Sleeth-Keppler, D. (2011). Multifinality in unconscious choice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 1124-1137.

9.

Dimofte, C. V., & Yalch, R. F. (2007). Consumer response to polysemous brand slogans. Journal of Consumer Research, 33(4), 515-522.

10.

Emmons, R. A., & King, L. A. (1988). Conflict among personal strivings: immediate and long-term implications for psychological and physical well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1040-1048.

11.

Etkin, J., Pocheptsova, A., & Espinoza Petersen, F. (2014). Two Birds, One Stone? Positive Mood Makes Products Seem Less Useful for Multiple-Goal Pursuit. Positive Mood Makes Products Seem Less Useful for Multiple-Goal Pursuit (July 14, 2014). Robert H. Smith School Research Paper No. RHS, 2466142.

12.

Fishbach, A., & Dhar, R. (2005). Goals as excuses or guides: The liberating effect of perceived goal progress on choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 32(3), 370-377.

13.

Fishbach, A., Dhar, R., & Zhang, Y. (2006). Subgoals as substitutes or complements: the role of goal accessibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(2), 232-242.

14.

Gentner, D., & Markman, A. B. (1997). Structure mapping in analogy and similarity. American Psychologist, 52(1), 45-56.

15.

Kruglanski, A. W. (1996). Goals as knowledge structures. In P. M. Gollwitzer and J. A. Bargh (Eds.), The psychology of action: Linking cognition and motivation to behavior (pp. 599- 618). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

16.

Kruglanski, A. W., Shah, J. Y., Fishbach, A., Friedman, R., Chun, W. Y., & Sleeth-Keppler, D. (2002). A theory of goal systems. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 34, 331-378.

17.

Kruglanski, A. W., Thompson, E. P., Higgins, E. T., Atash, M. N., Pierro, A., & Shah, J. Y. (2000). To “do the right thing” or to “just do it”: Locomotion and assessment as distinct self-regulatory imperatives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 793-815.

18.

McQuarrie, E. F., & Mick, D. G. (1999). Visual rhetoric in advertising: text-interpretive, experimental, and reader-response analyses. Journal of Consumer Research, 26(1), 37-54.

19.

Mitchell, A. A. (1983). Cognitive processes initiated by exposure to advertising. Information Processing Research in Advertising, ed. Richard Jackson Harris, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. 13-42.

20.

Orehek, E., Mauro, R., Kruglanski, A. W., & van der Bles, A. M. (2012). Prioritizing association strength versus value: The influence of self-regulatory modes on means evaluation in single goal and multigoal contexts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(1), 22-31.

21.

Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879-891.

22.

Stern, B. B. (1988). Medieval allegory: roots of advertising strategy for the mass market. The Journal of Marketing, 52(3), 884-94.

23.

Trope, Y., Liberman, N., & Wakslak, C. (2007). Construal levels and psychological distance: Effects on representation, prediction, evaluation, and behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology: The Official Journal of the Society for Consumer Psychology, 17(2), 83-95.

24.

Ward, J., & Gaidis, W. (1990). Metaphor In Promotional Communication: A Review of Research on Metaphor Comprehension and Quality. Advances in Consumer Research, 17(1). 636-642.

25.

Wyer, R. S., & Srull, T. K. (1986). Human cognition in its social context. Psychological Review, 93(3), 322-359.

26.

Zhang, Y., & Tu, Y. (2011). The impact of associative strength on performance in goal pursuit. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47(6), 1088-1095.

27.

Zhang, Y., Fishbach, A., & Kruglanski, A. W. (2007). The dilution model: how additional goals undermine the perceived instrumentality of a shared path. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(3), 389-401.

28.

Zhao, X., Lynch, J. G., & Chen, Q. (2010). Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(2), 197-206.

logo