바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

소비자의 조절적 동기가 구매후 후회에 미치는 영향

The Role of Consumer's Regulatory Focus on Postpurchase Regret

초록

기존연구에 의하면, 행동을 취한 경우(action)가 행동을 취하지 않은 경우(inaction)에 비해 부정적 결과에 대해서 더욱 후회가 크다고 한다(Kahneman & Tversky 1982). 반면에, Zeelnberg, Van den Bos, Van Dijk, & Pieters(2002)의 연구에 의하면, 행동을 취하지 않은 경우가 행동을 취한 경우에 비해 부정적 결과에 대해서 더욱 후회하는 것으로 나타났다. 이에 대해서 본 연구는 상반된 두 연구결과에 대한 새로운 해석으로 소비자의 조절적 동기(regulatory focus)의 개념을 이용하였다. 즉, 소비자의 조절적 동기에 따라 행동효과(action effect)와 무행동 효과(inaction effect)가 나타날 것으로 예측하였으며, 본 연구의 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 예방동기(prevention goal)를 지닌 소비자는 향상동기(promotion goal)를 지닌 소비자에 비해 부정적 결과에 대해서 더욱 후회하는 것으로 나타났다. 둘째, 예방동기를 지닌 소비자의 경우 Kahneman & Tversky(1982)의 연구결과와 같은 행동효과가 발생한 반면에 향상동기를 지닌 소비자의 경우에는 Zeelnberg, Van den Bos, Van Dijk, & Pieters(2002)의 결과처럼 무행동 효과가 발생하였다.

keywords
regulatory focus(promotion goals, prevention goals), action effect, inaction effect, counterfactual thinking, regret, 조절적 동기(향상동기, 예방동기), 행동 효과, 무행동 효과, 사후가정 사고, 후회., regulatory focus(promotion goals, prevention goals), action effect, inaction effect, counterfactual thinking, regret

Abstract

Previous research showed that action produce more regret than inaction(Kahneman & Tversky 1982). However, according to the studuies of Zeelnberg, Van den Bos, Van Dijk, & Pieters(2002), inaction produce more regret than action. Present study used a consumer's regulatory focus to present new interpretation regarding the discrepancy results described above. In the present study, we try to explain of the psychology of regret by consumer's regulatory focus. The conclusion of this study is written as below. First, consumers who have a prevention goals showed more regret than consumers who have a promotion goals on negative outcomes. Second, in the case of consumers who have a prevention goals, an action effect had occurred, like Kahneman & Tversky's(1982) studies. However, in the case of consumers who have a promotion goals, an inaction effect had occurred, like Zeelenberg, Van den Bos, Van Dijk, & Pieters's(2002) studies.

keywords
regulatory focus(promotion goals, prevention goals), action effect, inaction effect, counterfactual thinking, regret

참고문헌

1.

(2002) 선택집합의 크기와 구성이 비선택 옵션에 대한 선호에 미치는 영향,

2.

(2001) 사후가정사고의 활성화에서 조절적 동기의 역할 ,

3.

(1997) Regulatory Focus and Strategic Inclinations: Promotion and Prevention in Decision-Making. ,

4.

(1997) Beyond Pleasure and Pain,

5.

(1992) Personality and Cognition at the Level of Psychological Situation,

6.

(1997) Emotional Responses to Goal Attainment: Intensity of Regulatory Focus as Moderator.,

7.

(1997) A Generalized Utility Model of Disappointment and Regret Effects on Post-Choice Valuation,

8.

(1986) Norm Theory: Comparing Reality to Its Alternatives. ,

9.

(1982) The Psychology of Preferences, Kahneman

10.

(1982) An Alternative Theory of Rational Choice under Uncertainty,

11.

(1998) Choosing to Avoid Coping with Negatively Emotion-Laden Consumer Decisions ,

12.

(1995) Couterfactual Thinking and Satisfaction among Olympic Athletics ,

13.

(1994) The Functional Basis of Counterfactual Thinking Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,

14.

(1997) Counterfactual Thinking. ,

15.

(1995) Counterfactual Thinking: The Intersection of Affect and Function, Academic Press

16.

(1995) The Impact of Perceived Control on the Imagination of Better and Worse Possible Worlds,

17.

(1999) Counterfactual Thinking and Regulatory Focus: Implication for Action versus Inaction and Sufficiency versus Necessity.,

18.

(1997) Self-Efficacy and Counterfactual Thinking: Up a Creek with and without a Paddle,

19.

(2001) To Do or Not to Do Desirability and Consistency Mediated Judgment of Regret,

20.

(1997) Regulatory Focus as Determinant of Magnitude and Direction ,

21.

(1999) Anticipated Regret, Expected Feedback and Behavioral Decision-Making,

22.

(2001) What We Do When Decisions Go Awry: Behavioral Consequences of Experienced Regret. , Cambridge University Press

23.

(2002) The Inaction Effect in the Psychology of Regret ,

logo