바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

The Effect of Size, Position, and Partially Occlusionof Advertising on Consumer's Visual Behavior

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to verify the effect of the depth perception cue such as size, position and partially occlusion of stimulus on consumer's visual behavior using eye-tracker for more elaborate measurement and also examine the effect of interaction among each cue. We developed that a screen with three vertical columns which is the most common in 15 Korean famous portal sites as standard included experimental stimulus having four corners. Especially, partial occlusion was treated the number (0, 1, 2, 3, 4) of occlusion part that the outlines of a square stimuli are being on the background stimuli. Also, the size of stimulus had range from 50 pixels to 600 pixels with multiplying length of the height by length of the width randomly and the position of stimulus was randomly also with a ratio from 0 to 1, which is height percentage of background. 47 under graduate students who are 13 males and 34 females participated in our experiment, and they were exposed to 150 stimuli in 3 seconds each. Results show that size, position, and partially occlusion of stimuli have impact on consumers’ eye movement as frequency of fixation, duration, and initial fixation time on the target stimulus. More specifically, a stimuli’s size affected frequency of fixation most highly and a stimuli’s position had the most powerful impact on duration, and initial fixation time on the target stimulus. Generally, positive interaction within cues affected more on consumers’ eye movement than cues being alone. Finally, the depth perception cue such as size, position and partially occlusion cue of stimulus is useful to attract consumer's visual attention and it maximizes the effect of depth perception cue when it makes more positive interaction from each cue.

keywords
visual attention, depth perception cue, partially occlusion, advertising effects

Reference

1.

김재휘, 김태훈 (2001). 인터넷 광고 혼잡도가 광고 효과에 미치는 영향: 배너광고의 수와 침입성을 중심으로. 광고학연구, 12(4), 97-114.

2.

김지호, 김재휘, 나덕렬, 김계석, 이장한 (2005). 아이트래커를 활용한 인터넷 광고효과 연구. 광고학연구, 16(5), 179-194.

3.

김지호, 박하철, 김재휘, 이장한 (2006). 아이트래커를 활용한 인터넷 광고의 선택적 주의요소 효과 연구, 광고연구, 72, 31-58.

4.

김지호, 부수현, 김재휘 (2006). 깊이지각 단서에 따른 인터넷 광고의 효과검증. 한국심리학회 연차학술대회논문집, 514-515.

5.

김지호, 부수현, 김재휘 (2007). 광고의 깊이지각 단서가 시각적 주의에 미치는 영향에 대한 아이크래커 활용연구, 광고홍보학보, 9(2), 227-310.

6.

김지호, 송미란, 김재휘 (2007). 비의식적 광고 처리에서 나타나는 암묵적 기억의 광고효과: 시각적 주의를 중심으로. 한국심리학회지: 소비자․광고, 8(1), 81-102.

7.

Brefczynski, J. A. & Deyoe, E. A. (1999). A physiological correlate of the ‘spotlight’ of visual attention. Nature Neuroscience, 2, 370-374.

8.

Bruno, N. & Cutting, J. E. (1988). Minimodularity and the perception of layout. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 117, 161-170.

9.

Burke, R. R., & Srull, T. K. (1988). Competiive interference and consumer memory for advertising. Journal of Consumer Research, 15. 55-68.

10.

Dengler, M. & Nitschke, W. (1993). Color stereopsis: A model for depth reversals based on border contrast. Perception & Psychophysics, 53, 150-156.

11.

Dresp, Durand, & Grossberg (2002). Depth perception from pairs of overlapping cues in pictorial displays. Spatial Vision, 15, 225-276.

12.

Drèze, Xavier., & Hussherr, Francois-Xavier. (2003). Internet Advertising: Is Anybody Watching? Journal of Interactive Marketing, 17(4), 8-23.

13.

Egusa, H. (1983). Effect of brightness, hue, and saturation on perceived depth between adjacent regions in the visual field, perception, 12, 167-175.

14.

Fernandez, K. V., Rosen, D. L. (2000). The Effectiveness of Information and Color in Yellow Pages Advertising. Journal of Advertising, 29(2), 61-73.

15.

Gillam, B., & Nakayama, K. (1999). Quantitative depth for a phantom surface can be based on cyclopean occlusion cues alone, Vision Research, 39, 109-112

16.

Gillam, B., Blackburn, S., & Nakayama, K. (1999). Stereopisis based on monocular gaps: Metrical encoding of depth and slant without matching contours, Vision Research, 39, 493-502.

17.

Goldstein, E. B (2006). Sensation and perception, Thomson Wadsworth, Belmont.

18.

Grossberg, S. (1994). 3D vision and figure -ground separation by visual cortex. Perception and Psychophysics 55, 48-120.

19.

Grossberg, S. (1997). Cortical dynamics of 3D fiqure-ground perception of 2D pictures. Psychol. Rev. 104, 618-658.

20.

Janiszewski, C. (1988). Preconscious Processing Effects: The Independence of Attitude Formation and Conscious Thought. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(Sep), 199-209.

21.

Janiszewski, C. (1998). The Influence of Display Characteristics on Visual Exploratory Search Behavior. Journal of Consumer Research. 25. 290-301.

22.

Joseph, J. S., & Nakayama, K. (1999). Amodal representation depends on the object seen before partial occlusion, Vision Research, 39, 283-292.

23.

Kalawsky, R. S. (1993). The science of virtual reality and virtual enviroments. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

24.

Liu, T., Pestilli, F., & Carrasco, M. (2005). Transient attention enhances perceptual performance and fMRI response in human visual cortex. Neuron, 45, 469-477.

25.

MacKenzie, S. B. (1986). The Role of Attention in Mediating the Effect of Advertising on Attribute Importance. Journal of Consumer Research, 13(2), 174-195.

26.

Malhotra, N. K., Jain. A. K. & Lagakos. (1982). The information overload controversy: An alternative viewpoint. Journal of Marketing, 46(1), 27-37.

27.

Martinez-Trujillo, J., & Treue, S. (2002). Attentional modulation strength in cortical area MT depends on stimulus contrast. Neuron, 35, 365-370.

28.

McAdams, C. J., & Maunsell, J.H.R. (1999). Effects of attention on orientation-tuning functions of single neurons in macaque cortical area V4. the journal of Neuroscience, 19, 431-441.

29.

Nakayama, K., & Mackeben, M. (1989). Sustained and transient components of focal visual attention. Vision Research, 29, 1631-1647.

30.

Nakayama, K., & Silverman. G. H. (1986). Serial and parallel processing of visual feature conjunction. Nature, 320, 264-265.

31.

O'Shea, R. P., Blackburn, S. G., & Ono, H. (1994). Contrast as depth cue. Vision Research, 34, 1595-1604.

32.

Parasuraman, R. (2000). The attentive brain, London: A Bradford Book.

33.

Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124(3), 372-422.

34.

Reed. S. K. (2007). Cognition: theory and applications. seventh edition. CA: Thomson Wadworth.

35.

Reynolds, J.H., Pasternak, T., & Desimone, R. (2000). Attention increases sensitivity of V4 neurons. Neuron, 26, 703-714.

36.

Rock, I., Shallo, J., & Schwartz, F. (1978). Rictorial depth and related constancy effects as a function of recognition. Perception, 7, 3-19.

37.

Rossiter, J. R. (1981). Predicting Starch Scores. Journal of Advertising Research, 21(5), 63-68.

38.

Schindler, R. M., Berbaum, M., Weinzimer, D. R. (1987). How an Attention-Getting Device Can Affect Quick Choice among Similar Alternatives. Advances in Consumer Research, 14, 505-509.

39.

Schoorman, J. P., & Robben, H. S. J. (1997). The effect of new package design on product attention, categorization and evaluation. Journal of Economic Psychology, 18, 271-287.

40.

Solso, R. L. (1996). Cognition & the visual Art. Mit Press.

41.

Stapel, J. (1998). Recall and Recognition: A Very Close Relationship. Journal of Advertising Research, 38(Jul), 41-45.

42.

Stevenson, S., Bruner, C. G. II. & Kumar, A. (2000). Webpage background and viewer attitudes. Journal of Advertising Research, 40(1/2), 29-35.

43.

Sweller, J. (2003). Evolution of human cognitive architecture. In B, Ross (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation(Vol. 43, pp. 215-266). San Diego: Academic Press.

logo