바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

메뉴

논문 상세

긍정선택방식과 부정선택방식에 대한 소비자 인지 및 정서반응 비교

Comparison of consumers' cognitive and affective responses in positive and negative choices

초록

선택은 마음에 드는 것을 고르거나 마음에 들지 않는 것을 고르고 남는 것을 가지는 두 가지 방식으로 이루어질 수 있다. 본 연구에서는 fMRI 뇌 영상자료와 행동자료를 통해 두 선택방식(긍정선택/부정선택)에서 나타나는 처리과정의 차이에 대해 알아보았다. 뇌 영상 촬영법으로 얻은 자료를 분석한 연구 1의 결과, 긍정선택에서 보상을 예상하고 정서를 느끼는 등 정서반응이 더 많았으나 두 선택방식 모두 공통적으로 관련 기억을 떠올려 제품을 선택하는 기억기반의 인지반응을 보였다. 두 선택방식에서 인지반응이 유사하게 나타나기는 했으나 긍정선택에서 기억인출과 선택 및 판단이 더 관여되는 것으로 보아 긍정선택 시 더 많은 정보처리 노력을 요하는 것을 알 수 있다. 연구 1에서와 동일한 제품 제시방법을 사용하여 여러 의식적 반응을 측정한 연구 2의 결과에서는 긍정선택 시 보다 긍정적인 정서를 느끼며 선호가 더 강화되는 결과가 나타났다. 반면 정보처리의 노력 정도로 측정한 몰입 수준은 대안의 구성과 선택 방식의 적합성 정도가 두 선택조건에서 비슷하여 차이가 없는 것으로 나타났다. 본 연구는 기존 연구와 달리 시각적으로 제품을 제시하였고 두 선택방식의 차이에서 간과된 정서반응의 차이를 검증하여 기존 결과를 보다 세분화하였다는 의의를 가진다.

keywords
a positive choice, a negative choice, fMRI, preference accentuation, commitment, compatibility, 긍정선택, 부정선택, 뇌 영상 연구, 선호의 강화, 몰입, 적합성

Abstract

Choice can be made in two different modes. One is choosing what one likes (a positive choice) and the other is choosing what one doesn’t like and has what is left (a negative choice). The present study investigated process differences in the positive and negative choice by analyzing fMRI and behavioral data. In study 1 with fMRI data, the results showed that the positive choice made people expect an unrealized pleasant outcome and thus respond more emotionally. Cognitively, both of the choices exhibited memory based processing, but more areas were activated in the positive choice, indicating that more cognitive efforts were involved in the positive choice. In study 2, we presented the stimuli in the same way with in the study 1 and obtained several behavioral measures. In the positive choice, participants reported more positive affective responses and their preferences were more accentuated. However, there was no significant difference in commitment and it seemed due to that the compatibility between choice set composition and choice mode was similar in the two choice modes. We presented visual stimuli unlike previous studies and contributed to the literature by showing different affective responses in the two choice modes, which was overlooked, and by examining the role of compatibility in more detail.

keywords
a positive choice, a negative choice, fMRI, preference accentuation, commitment, compatibility

참고문헌

1.

성영신, (2005) 제품디자인에 대한 미적 민감성이란 무엇인가?, 한국심리학회: 연차학술 발표대회 논문집

2.

Addis, D. R, (2004) Characterizing spatial and temporal features of autobiographical memory retrieval networks: A partial least squares approach, NeuroImage

3.

Beattie J, (2001) Prediction perceived differences in tradeoff difficulty, Conflict and tradeoffs in decision making

4.

Bloch, P. H, (2003) Individual differences in the centrality of visual product aesthetics: concept and measurement, Journal of Consumer Research

5.

Cardinal R.N, (2002) Emotion and motivation: the role of the amygdala, ventral striatum, and prefrontal cortex, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews

6.

Critchley, H. D, (2005) Activity in the human brain predicting differential heart rate responses to emotional facial expressions, NeuroImage

7.

DeCarlo, (1996) Impact of salesperson attraction on sales managers' attributions and feedback, Journal of Marketing

8.

Delgado M. R, (2000) Tracking the hemodynamic responses to reward and punishment in the striatum, Journal of Neurophysiology

9.

Ganzach,Y, (1995) Attribute scatter and decision outcome: Judgment versus choice, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes

10.

Gardini, S, (2006) Left mediotemporal structures mediate the retrieval of episodic autobiographical mental images, NeuroImage

11.

Huber, V. L, (1987) Decision bias and personnel selection strategies, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes

12.

Jacobsen, T, (2005) Brain correlates of aesthetic judgment of beauty, Neuroimage

13.

Kim H, (2007) Temporal dissociation of neural processes underlying face preference decisions, PNAS

14.

Levin, I. P, (2001) Prescreening of choice options in 'positive' and 'negative' decision-making tasks, Journal of Behavioral Decision Making

15.

Maddock, J, (2001) Remembering familiar people: The posterior cingulate cortex and autobiographical memory retrieval, Neuroscience

16.

Mandler,G, (1982) The structure of value: accounting for taste, Affect and cognition: The Seventeenth Annual Carnegie Symposium on Cognition

17.

Meloy, M. G, (2004) Binary choice under instructions to select versus reject, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes

18.

Nisbett, R. E, (1977) Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes, Psychological Review

19.

Nowlis, S. M, (1997) Attribute- task compatibility as a determinant of consumer preference reversals, Journal of Marketing Research

20.

O'Doherty J, (2004) Dissociable roles of ventral and dorsal striatum in instrumental conditioning, Science

21.

Oliver,R.L, (1980) A cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction decisions, Journal of Marketing Research

22.

Ordonez, L. D, (1999) Testing the compatibility test: How instructions, accountability, and anticipated regret affect prechoice screening of options, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes

23.

Ratneshwarand S, (1991) Comprehension's role in persuasion: The case of its moderating effect on the persuasive impact of source cues, Journal of Consumer Research

24.

Schmitt, B. H, (1997) Marketing aesthetics: The strategic management of brands, Identity and Image, New York: Free Press

25.

Shafir,E, (1993) Choosing versus rejecting: Why some options are both better and worse than others, Memory & Cognition

26.

Thompson-Schill, S. L, (1997) Role of left prefrontal cortex in retrieval of semantic knowledge: A re-evaluation, Proceedings of the National Academy of Science

27.

Wedell,D.H, (1997) Another look at reasons for choosing and rejecting, Memory & Cognition

28.

Westenberg, M. R. M, (1990) Response mode and decision strategies. In Contemporary Issues in Decision Making, North-Holland: Amsterdam

29.

Westenberg, M. R. M, (1992) Response modes, decision processes and decision outcomes, Acta Psychologica

30.

Yaniv, I, (1997) Elimination and inclusion procedures in judgment under uncertainty, Journal of Behavioral Decision Making

31.

Zajonc,R.B, (1980) Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences, American Psychologist

logo