바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

메뉴

The effect of chronic/situational regulatory focus and task performance feedback on consumer affect

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine which difference there is in consumer affect(dejection & agitation-related affect and the cheerfulness & quiescence-related affect) depending on task performance feedback in success vs. failure, by combining the chronic regulatory focus, which an individual has chronically, with the situational regulatory focus, which can be decided by a momentary goal. As results of the experiment, the main effect of the task performance feedback was indicated in common. The level in dejection-related affect and agitation-related affect was significantly higher in the condition of feedback with failure than the condition of feedback with success. On the other hand, the cheerfulness-related affect and the quiescence-related affect were indicated to be significantly higher in the case of feedback with success than the case of feedback with failure. Also, it could be known that the influence of the situational regulatory focus is functioning more superiorly in the dejection-related affect, and on the other hand, the chronic regulatory focus is functioning more strongly in the agitation-related affect. Through experiment, it was confirmed that even the cheerfulness-related affect was influenced relatively more by the chronic regulatory focus, but that the correlation between these two regulatory focuses has the effect in the quiescence-related affect.

keywords
chronic regulatory focus, situational regulatory focus, performance feedback, consumer affect

Reference

1.

강혜자 ; 한덕웅, (2005) 자기차이에 따른 우울과 불안의 경험, 한국심리학회지: 건강

2.

한덕웅 ; 나영심, (2005) 자기지침과 조절초점의 불일치가자기정서에 미치는 영향, 한국심리학회지: 건강

3.

조수완, (2007) 부정적 감정과 정보처리유형이 추론에 미치는 영향: 분노와 슬픔을 중심으로,

4.

Aaker, J. L, (2001) “I” seek pleasures and "we" avoid pains: The role of self-regulatory goals in information processing and persuasion, Journal of Consumer Research

5.

Avnet, T, (2006) How regulatory fit affects value in consumer choices and opinions, Journal of Marketing Research

6.

Cesario, J, (2004) Regulatory fit and persuasion: Transfer from “feeling right", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

7.

Chernov,A, (2004) Goal-attribute compatibility in consumer choice, Journal of Consumer Psychology

8.

Chernov,A, (2004) Goal orientation and consumer preference for the status quo, Journal of Consumer Research

9.

Cohen,J, (1977) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, New York: Academic Press

10.

Cole, P. G, (1987) Teaching principle and practice, NY: Prentice Hall

11.

Crowe, E, (1997) Regulatory focus and strategic inclinations: Promotion and prevention in decision-making, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process

12.

Garg, N, (2005) Incidental and task-related affect: A reinquiry and extension of the influence of affect on choice, Journal of Consumer Research

13.

Higgins,E.T, (1987) Self-discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect, Psychological Review

14.

Higgins,E.T, (1996) Knowledge activation: Accessibility, applicability, and salience, Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles. New York: Guilford.

15.

Higgins,E.T, (1997) Beyond pleasure and pain, American Psychologist

16.

Higgins,E.T, (1998) Promotion and prevention: Regulatory focus as a motivational principle, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology

17.

Higgins,E.T, (2000) Making a good decision: Value from fit, American Psychologist

18.

Higgins,E.T, (2002) How self-regulation creates distinct value: The case of promotion and prevention decision making, Journal of Consumer Psychology

19.

Higgins, E. T, (1986) Self-discrepancies and emotional vulnerability: How magnitude, accessibility, and type of discrepancy influence affect, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

20.

Higgins, E. T, (1997) Emotional responses to goal attainment: Strength of regulatory focus as moderator, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

21.

Higgins, E. T, (1992) Self-discrepancies and biographical memory: Personality and cognition at the level of psychological situation, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

22.

Idoson, L. C, (2000) Distinguishing gains from nonlosses and losses from nongains: A regulatory focus perspective on hedonic intensity, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

23.

Lockwood, P, (2002) Motivation by positive or negative role models: Regulatory focus determines who will best inspire us, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

24.

Pham, M. T, (2004) Ideals and oughts and the reliance on affect versus substance in persuasion, Journal of Consumer Research

25.

Raghunathan, R, (2006) Informational properties of anxiety and sadness, and displaced coping, Journal of Consumer Research

26.

Roney, C. J. R, (1995) Goal and framing: How outcome focus influences motivation and emotion, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

27.

Rose, N, (1999) Counterfactual thinking and regulatory focus: Implication for action versus necessity, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

28.

Shah, J, (1997) Expectancy x value effects: Regulatory focus as determinant of magnitude and direction, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

29.

Shah, J, (1998) Performance incentives and means: How regulatory focus influences goal attainment, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

30.

Van-Dijk, D, Positive(negative) feedback: Encouragement or discouragement?, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem

31.

Yi, S. W, (2004) Coping with negative emotions in purchase-related situations, Journal of Consumer Psychology

32.

Zhu, R, (2007) Exploring the cognitive mechanism that underlies regulatory focus effects, Journal of Consumer Research

33.

Zeelenberg, M, (2004) Beyond valence in customer dissatisfaction: A review and new findings on behavioral responses to regret and disappointment in failed services, Journal of Business Research

logo