바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
 

한국심리학회지:학교

초기 청소년기의 또래네트워크가 공격성의 사회화에 미치는 영향: 또래 공동체 의식의 조절효과

Socialization of Aggression in Early-Adolescence: The Moderating Effect of Sense of Peer Community

초록

본 연구는 초기 청소년기 학생의 또래네트워크가 공격성의 사회화(또래선택과 또래영향)에 미치는 영향을 탐색하고, 또래 공동체 의식의 조절효과를 탐색하는 데 그 목적이 있다. 이를 위하여 총 37학급 960명의 초등학교 5-6학년 학생(여학생 461명, 48%)을 대상으로, 1학기와 2학기 총 2회에 걸쳐 공격성과 또래네트워크를 측정하였다. 공격성의 또래선택과 또래영향 과정을 분석하기 위해 종단사회연결망분석(longitudinal social network analysis: SIENA)을 실시한 결과, 공격성의 사회화 경향이 나타났다. 학생들은 유사한 공격성 수준을 보이는 친구와 또래네트워크를 형성하였으며, 또래네트워크의 구성원으로부터 공격성을 학습하는 경향을 보였다. 뿐만 아니라 공격성의 또래선택과 또래영향 과정에 대한 또래 공동체 의식의 조절효과가 나타났다. 또래 공동체 의식이 낮은 학급에서는 공격성의 또래선택과 또래영향 과정이 나타났다. 반면, 또래 공동체 의식이 높은 학급에서는 공격성의 또래선택과 또래영향 과정이 나타나지 않았다. 연구결과 높은 또래 공동체 의식은 공격성의 사회화를 예방하는 주요한 기제로 작용함을 알 수 있었다. 이와 같은 연구결과를 바탕으로 학급의 생활지도에 있어, 또래네트워크에 대한 이해의 중요성 및 교사의 역할을 논의하였다.

keywords
Aggressive Behavior, Peer Selection, Peer Influence, Longitudinal Social Network Analysis, Sense of Peer Community, 공격성, 또래선택, 또래영향, 종단 사회연결망 분석, 또래 공동체 의식

Abstract

This study aims to investigate peer influence processes on early adolescents’ aggressive behaviors in early adolescence friendship networks. A longitudinal social network model (SIENA) was used to test whether similarity in aggressive behaviors contributed to friendship formation (peer selection) and whether aggressive behaviors of friends contributed to changes in students’ own aggressive and pro-social behaviors (peer influence). Participants were fifth and sixth graders in South Korea from 37 elementary school classrooms (N=960, 48% girls) followed from spring to fall within one academic year. In result, early adolescence students sought out friends who are similar to themselves (peer selection) was found in both aggressive behaviors. Peer influence effects were also observed in aggressive behaviors. Also, the moderating effect of sense of peer community was significant. In classes with the high sense of peer community, socialization effect of aggressive behavior was not significant. As a contrast, aggressive behavior was socialized in classes with the low sense of peer community. Results suggest that peer selection and influence processes play a salient role in the co-evolution of friendships, and aggressive behaviors in elementary school students. Findings emphasize the need for teacher understanding of adolescence development and peer relationship in classroom management.

keywords
Aggressive Behavior, Peer Selection, Peer Influence, Longitudinal Social Network Analysis, Sense of Peer Community, 공격성, 또래선택, 또래영향, 종단 사회연결망 분석, 또래 공동체 의식

참고문헌

1.

김종민 (2015). 사회선택 통계모형의 방법론적 특성과 p2와 p*모형을 활용한 남자고등학생의 영어도움 네트워크 분석. 교육평가연구, 28(3), 753–777.

2.

김진구 (2017). 초등학생의 또래생태에 대한 교사-학생 지지와 갈등의 조절효과: 공격성의 또래영향과 사회화를 중심으로. 건국대학교 박사학위 논문.

3.

김진구, 박종효 (2015). 초등학생의 공격성이 사회적 지위에 미치는 영향: 또래 공동체 의식과 교사 친밀성의 조절효과. 열린교육연구, 23(4), 207-231.

4.

신희영 (2015). 교사의 정서적 지원이 청소년의 공격 행동 관련 교우 영향과정에 미치는 연구. 교육심리연구, 29(2), 361-382.

5.

Ahn, H. J., & Rodkin, P. C. (2014). Classroom-level predictors of the social status of aggression: Friendship centralization, friendship density, teacher-student attunement, and gender. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(4), 1144-1156.

6.

Audley-Piotrowski, S., Singer, A., & Patterson, M. (2015). The role of the teacher in children’s peer relations: Making the invisible hand intentional. Translational Issues in Psychological Science, 1(2), 192-200.

7.

Babcock, B., Marks, P. E., Crick, N. R., & Cillessen, A. H. (2014). Limited nomination reliability using single and multiple item measures. Social Development, 23(3), 518-536.

8.

Battistich, V., Solomon, D., Watson, M., & Schaps, E. (1997). Caring school communities. Educational Psychologist, 32(3), 137-151.

9.

Boivin, M., Dodge, K. A., & Coie, J. D. (1995). Individual-group behavioral similarity and peer status in experimental play groups of boys: The social misfit revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(2), 269-279.

10.

Bukowski, W. M., Sippola, L. K., & Newcomb, A. F. (2000). Variations in patterns of attraction of same-and other-sex peers during early adolescence. Developmental Psychology, 36(2), 147-154.

11.

Cappella, E., & Hwang, S. H. (2015). Peer contexts in schools: avenues toward behavioral health in early adolescence. Behavioral Medicine, 41(3), 80-89.

12.

Crick, N. R., & Dodge, K. A. (1994). A review and reformulation of social information- processing mechanisms in children's social adjustment. Psychological bulletin, 115(1), 74-101.

13.

Crick, N. R., & Dodge, K. A. (1996). Social information‐processing mechanisms in reactive and proactive aggression. Child development, 67(3), 993-1002.

14.

Crick, N. R., & Grotpeter, J. K. (1995). Relational aggression, gender, and social‐psychological adjustment. Child development, 66(3), 710-722.

15.

DeLay, D., Ha, T., Van Ryzin, M., Winter, C., & Dishion, T. J. (2016). Changing friend selection in middle school: A social network analysis of a randomized intervention study designed to prevent adolescent problem behavior. Prevention Science, 17(3), 285-294.

16.

DeLay, D., L. Zhang, L. D. Hanish, C. F. Miller, R. A. Fabes, C. L. Martin, K. P. Kochel, and K. A. Updegraff. (2016). Peer influence on academic performance: A social network analysis of social-emotional intervention effects. Prevention Science, 17(8), 903-913.

17.

Dijkstra, J. K., Berger, C., & Lindenberg, S. (2011). Do physical and relational aggression explain adolescents' friendship selection? The competing roles of network characteristics, gender, and social status. Aggressive behavior, 37(5), 417-429.

18.

Dodge, K. A., Lansford, J. E., Burks, V. S., Bates, J. E., Pettit, G. S., Fontaine, R., & Price, J. M. (2003). Peer rejection and social information‐processing factors in the development of aggressive behavior problems in children. Child development, 74(2), 374-393.

19.

Estell, D. B., Farmer, T. W., Pearl, R., Van Acker, R., & Rodkin, P. C. (2008). Social status and aggressive and disruptive behavior in girls: Individual, group, and classroom influences. Journal of school psychology, 46(2), 193-212.

20.

Farmer, T. W. (2000). Misconceptions of peer rejection and problem behavior: Understanding aggression in students with mild disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 21(4), 194-208.

21.

Garandeau, C. F., & Cillessen, A. H. (2006). From indirect aggression to invisible aggression: A conceptual view on bullying and peer group manipulation. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 11(6), 612-625.

22.

Garandeau, C. F., Ahn, H. J., & Rodkin, P. C. (2011). The social status of aggressive students across contexts: the role of classroom status hierarchy, academic achievement, and grade. Developmental psychology, 47(6), 1699-1710.

23.

Gest, S. D., & Rodkin, P. C. (2011). Teaching practices and elementary classroom peer ecologies. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 32(5), 288-296.

24.

Gest, S. D., Welsh, J. A., & Domitrovich, C. E. (2005). Behavioral predictors of changes in social relatedness and liking school in elementary school. Journal of school psychology, 43(4), 281-301.

25.

Huisman, M., & Snijders, T. A. (2003). Statistical analysis of longitudinal network data with changing composition. Sociological methods & research, 32(2), 253-287.

26.

Huisman, M., & Steglich, C. (2008). Treatment of non-response in longitudinal network studies. Social Networks, 30(4), 297-308.

27.

Jennings, P. A., & Greenberg, M. T. (2009). The prosocial classroom: Teacher social and emotional competence in relation to student and classroom outcomes. Review of educational research, 79(1), 491-525.

28.

Juvonen, J., & Graham, S. (2014). Bullying in schools: The power of bullies and the plight of victims. Annual review of psychology, 65, 159-185.

29.

Kallgren, C. A., Reno, R. R., & Cialdini, R. B. (2000). A focus theory of normative conduct: When norms do and do not affect behavior. Personality and social psychology bulletin, 26(8), 1002-1012.

30.

Laninga‐Wijnen, L., Harakeh, Z., Steglich, C., Dijkstra, J. K., Veenstra, R., & Vollebergh, W. (2016). The norms of popular peers moderate friendship dynamics of adolescent aggression. Child Development. Advanced online publication. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12650.

31.

Logis, H. A., Rodkin, P. C., Gest, S. D., & Ahn, H. J. (2013). Popularity as an organizing factor of preadolescent friendship networks: Beyond prosocial and aggressive behavior. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 23(3), 413- 423.

32.

Neal, J. W., & Neal, Z. P. (2013). Nested or networked? Future directions for ecological systems theory. Social Development, 22(4), 722-737.

33.

Olweus, D. (1994). Bullying at school: basic facts and effects of a school based intervention program. Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, 35(7), 1171-1190.

34.

Ripley, R. M., Snijders, T. A., & Preciado, P. (2011). Manual for SIENA version 4.0. University of Oxford.

35.

Rodkin, P. C., Ryan, A. M., Jamison, R., & Wilson, T. (2013). Social goals, social behavior, and social status in middle childhood. Developmental Psychology, 49(6), 1139 -1150.

36.

Rulison, K. L., Gest, S. D., & Loken, E. (2013). Dynamic social networks and physical aggression: The moderating role of gender and social status among peers. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 23(3), 437-449.

37.

Salmivalli, C. (2010). Bullying and the peer group: A review. Aggression and violent behavior, 15(2), 112-120.

38.

Shi, B., & Xie, H. (2012). Socialization of physical and social aggression in early adolescents' peer groups: High‐status peers, individual status, and gender. Social development, 21(1), 170-194.

39.

Sijtsema, J. J., Ojanen, T., Veenstra, R., Lindenberg, S., Hawley, P. H., & Little, T. D. (2010). Forms and functions of aggression in adolescent friendship selection and influence: A longitudinal social network analysis. Social Development, 19(3), 515-534.

40.

Snijders, T. A. (2001). The statistical evaluation of social network dynamics. Sociological Methodology, 31(1), 361-395.

41.

Sutton, J., & Smith, P. K. (1999). Bullying as a group process: An adaptation of the participant role approach. Aggressive Behavior, 25(2), 97-111.

42.

Thomas, D. E., Bierman, K. L., & Powers, C. J. (2011). The influence of classroom aggression and classroom climate on aggressive-disruptive behavior. Child development, 82(3), 751-757.

43.

Veenstra, R., Dijkstra, J. K., Steglich, C., & Van Zalk, M. H. (2013). Network-behavior dynamics. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 23(3), 399-412.

44.

Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge university press.

한국심리학회지:학교