바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
 

한국심리학회지:학교

한국판 대학생 진로타협 경향성 척도의 타당화 연구

Validation of the Korean Version of the Willingness to Career Compromise Scale for College Students

초록

본 연구는 진로타협에 있어서 개인차를 반영하는 진로타협 경향성 척도를 국내 대학생 집단을 대상으로 타당화하고자 하였다. 구체적으로 진로타협 경향성 척도의 요인구조를 확인하고, 내적 일치도 및 검사-재검사 신뢰도를 분석하였으며, 진로관련 요인들과의 준거관련 타당도를 살펴보았다. 추가적으로 본 척도가 남녀 집단에 동등하게 사용될 수 있는지를 확인하기 위하여 측정모형의 동일성과 잠재평균검증이 이루어졌다. 이를 위해 총 456명의 남녀대학생이 연구에 참여하였으며, 그 중 368명을 대상으로 6개월 간격의 검사-재검사 신뢰도 검증이 이루어졌다. 연구참여자들은 온라인 설문을 통해 한국어로 번안된 진로타협 경향성 척도에 응답하였으며, 진로타협 경향성 척도와의 준거타당도 분석을 위하여 대학생 진로타협척도, 청년 실업자를 위한 진로타협척도, 타협으로 인한 진로가치 불일치 척도, 진로포부척도, 진로적응성 척도도 함께 실시되었다. 진로타협 경향성 척도의 요인분석 결과 요인부하량이 낮은 1개의 문항을 제외한 8개의 문항들의 단일요인구조가 지지되었으며, 내적 일치도와 안정적 검사-재검사 신뢰도를 지지하는 결과가 나타났다. 남녀 집단차와 관련해서는 형태동일성, 측정단위동일성, 부분절편동일성이 성립되었으며 잠재평균분석 결과 여자대학생 집단의 수준이 더 높은 것으로 나타났다. 아울러 진로타협경향성은 두 유형의 진로타협척도와 정적 상관을, 내적 진로가치 불일치, 진로포부 및 진로적응성과는 부적 상관을 나타냈다. 본 연구 결과는 한국판 진로타협 경향성 척도가 전반적으로 원척도와 유사한 심리측정적 특성을 가지고 있으며, 남녀 대학생 집단 모두에게 사용될 수 있음을 시사한다.

keywords
Willingness to Career Compromise, scale validation, reliability, validity, measurement invariance, latent mean analysis, 진로타협 경향성, 척도 타당화, 신뢰도, 타당도, 측정모형동일성, 잠재평균분석

Abstract

This study validated the Willingness to Career Compromise scale measuring the individual differences in the tendency of career compromise with Korean college students. Specifically, the factor structure, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and criterion-related validity with career variables were examined. In addition, we investigated the measurement invariance and latent means between men and women. A total of 456 male and female college students participated, and 368 participants returned for test-retest reliability in 6 months. They completed an online survey consisting of the Korean translation of the Willingness to Career Compromise scale, career compromise scale for college students, career compromise scale for unemployed youths, career value discrepancy scale, and career adaptability scale. The results supported one factor structure with an exception of one item. The results also provided the evidence for internal consistency and test-restest reliability. Testing measurement invariance yielded configural, metric, partial scalar invariances across genders. Women reported a higher latent mean than men. Moreover, the Willingness to Career Compromise scale was positively related to two types of career compromise measures, and negatively with internal value discrepancy, career aspiration and career adaptability. This study indicates that the psychometric properties of the Korean Willingness to Career Compromise scale are similar to those of the original scale in general, and it is appropriate for being used across genders.

keywords
Willingness to Career Compromise, scale validation, reliability, validity, measurement invariance, latent mean analysis, 진로타협 경향성, 척도 타당화, 신뢰도, 타당도, 측정모형동일성, 잠재평균분석

참고문헌

1.

강재연 (2009). 한국 대학생의 진로타협과 진로관련 심리적 변인과의 관계. 박사학위논문, 한양대학교

2.

고민위, 강지현 (2015). 불확실성에 대한 인내력 부족이 남녀 대학생의 진로장벽에 미치는 영향: 완벽주의의 조절효과. Journal of Human Understanding and Counseling, 36(2), 21-40.

3.

고지영 (2005). 청년실업자의 진로타협 요인분석. 경기대학교 석사학위논문.

4.

권경미 (2016). 전문대학생의 긍정심리자본과 사회적 지지가 진로성숙도에 미치는 영향. 숭실대학교 석사학위논문

5.

김경은, 라영안 (2015). 대학생 진로 타협 척도 개발과 타당화 연구. 진로교육연구, 28(3), 103-121.

6.

김미연, 방희정 (2005). 진로타협과정에서의 성별과 출생순위에 따른 선호도 차이. 한국심리학회지: 여성, 10(2), 173-188.

7.

박효희, 성태제 (2008). 성별 진로성숙도 변화에 있어 부모-청소년 자녀 유대가 미치는 종단적 매개효과 검증. 한국청소년연구, 19(1), 117-142.

8.

손은령, 손진희 (2005). 한국 대학생의 진로결정 및 준비행동-사회 인지적 진로이론을 중심으로. 한국심리학회지: 상담 및 심리치료, 17(2), 399-417.

9.

양남희, 홍은실(2011). 고등학생의 가족건강성과 진로성숙도에 관한 연구. 한국가정과교육학회지, 23(4), 143-157.

10.

연규진, 양지웅, 이정선, 장애경, 김정기 (2013). 학부생과 대학원생의 성별에 따른 진로장벽의 차이: 이공계 대학을 중심으로. 한국심리학회지: 여성, 18(2), 295-316.

11.

유성경, 홍세희, 이아라. (2006). 남녀 학업 우수 청소년이 지각하는 진로장벽과 진로포부의 관계에서 학업 효능감의 매개모형 검증. 한국심리학회지: 상담 및 심리치료, 18(4), 837-851.

12.

임선희, 전혜영 (2004). 여자대학생의 직업세계 이행과 진로장벽-지역대학의 사례. 교육사회학연구, 14(1), 101-120.

13.

정주리, 이기학 (2007). 성별과 성역할 고정관념에 따른 진로타협 과정에서 선호도 차이. 한국심리학회지: 여성, 12(2), 161-174.

14.

홍세희 (2000). 구조 방정식 모형의 적합도 지수 선정기준과 그 근거. 한국심리학회지: 임상, 19(1), 161-177.

15.

홍세희, 황매향, 이은설 (2005). 청소년용 여성 진로장벽 척도의 잠재평균분석. 교육심리연구, 19(4), 1159-1177.

16.

Armstrong, P. I., &Crombie, G. (2000). Compromises in adolescents' occupational aspirations and expectations from grades 8 to 10. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 56(1), 82-98.

17.

Blanchard, C. A., & Lichtenberg, J. W. (2003). Compromise in career decision making: A test of Gottfredson’s theory. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 62(2), 250-271.

18.

Brandtstädter, J., & Renner, G. (1990). Tenacious goal pursuit and flexible goal adjustment: Explication and age-related analysis of assimilative and accommodative strategies of coping. Psychology and aging, 5(1), 58-67.

19.

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences 2nd edn.

20.

Creed, P. A., & Blume, K. (2013). Compromise, well-being, and action behaviors in young adults in career transition. Journal of Career Assessment, 21(1), 3-19.

21.

Creed, P. A., & Gagliardi, R. E. (2015). Career compromise, career distress, and perceptions of employability: The moderating roles of social capital and core self-evaluations. Journal of Career Assessment, 23(1), 20-34.

22.

Creed, P., Prideaux, L. A., & Patton, W. (2005). Antecedents and consequences of career decisional states in adolescence. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 67(3), 397-412.

23.

Ernst Kossek, E., & Ozeki, C. (1998). Work-family conflict, policies, and the job-life satisfaction relationship: A review and directions for organizational behavior-human resources research. Journal of applied psychology, 83(2), 139.

24.

Gottfredson, L. S. (1981). Circumscription and compromise: A developmental theory of occupational aspirations. Journal of Counseling psychology, 28(6), 545.

25.

Gottfredson, L. (1996). Gottfredson’s theory of circumscription and compromise. In D. Brown, L. Brooks, & Associates (Eds.), Career choice and development (pp. 179-232). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers

26.

Gottfredson, L. S. (2002). Gottfredson’s theory of circumscription, compromise, and self-creation. Career choice and development, 4, 85-148.

27.

Gregor, M. A., & O’Brien, K. M. (2016). Understanding career aspirations among young women: Improving instrumentation. Journal of Career Assessment, 24(3), 559-572.

28.

Hancock, G. R. (1997). Structural equation modeling methods of hypothesis testing of latent variable means. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 30(2), 91.

29.

Herzberg, F. (1959). The motivation to work. New York: Holy Wiley & Sons.

30.

Hesketh, B., Durant, C., & Pryor, R. (1990). Career compromise: A test of Gottfredson's (1981) theory using a policy-capturing procedure. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 36(1), 97-108.

31.

Hesketh, B., & McLachlan, K. (1991). Career compromise and adjustment among graduates in the banking industry. British Journal of Guidance &Counselling, 19(2), 191-208.

32.

Hirschi, A., Niles, S. G., & Akos, P. (2011). Engagement in adolescent career preparation: Social support, personality and the development of choice decidedness and congruence. Journal of Adolescence, 34(1), 173-182.

33.

Howard, K. A., Carlstrom, A. H., Katz, A. D., Chew, A. Y., Ray, G. C., Laine, L., & Caulum, D. (2011). Career aspirations of youth: Untangling race/ethnicity, SES, and gender. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 79(1), 98-109.

34.

Iyengar, S. S., Wells, R. E., & Schwartz, B. (2006). Doing better but feeling worse: Looking for the “best” job undermines satisfaction. Psychological Science, 17(2), 143-150.

35.

Junk, K. E., & Armstrong, P. I. (2010). Stability of career aspirations: A longitudinal test of Gottfredson’s theory. Journal of Career Development, 37(3), 579-598.

36.

Kim, Y. H., O’Brien, K. M., &Kim, H. (2016). Measuring Career Aspirations Across Cultures: Using the Career Aspiration Scale With Young Korean Women. Journal of Career Assessment, 24(3), 573-585.

37.

Leung, S. A. (1993). Circumscription and compromise: A replication study with Asian Americans. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 40(2), 188.

38.

Leung, S. A., & Plake, B. S. (1990). A choice dilemma approach for examining the relative importance of sex type and prestige preferences in the process of career choice compromise. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 37(4), 399.

39.

Metz, A. J., Fouad, N., & Ihle-Helledy, K. (2009). Career aspirations and expectations of college students: Demographic and labor market comparisons. Journal of Career Assessment, 17(2), 155-171.

40.

Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2010). Mplus 6.0 [Computer Software] Los Angeles CA: Muthén & Muthén.

41.

Parker, A. M., De Bruin, W. B., & Fischhoff, B. (2007). Maximizers versus satisficers: Decision- making styles, competence, and outcomes. Judgment and Decision making, 2(6), 342.

42.

Patton, W., & Creed, P. (2007). The relationship between career variables and occupational aspirations and expectations for Australian high school adolescents. Journal of Career Development, 34(2), 127-148.

43.

Packard, B. W. L., & Babineau, M. E. (2009). From drafter to engineer, doctor to nurse: An examination of career compromise as renegotiated by working-class adults over time. Journal of Career Development, 35(3), 207-227.

44.

Rottinghaus, P. J., Day, S. X., & Borgen, F. H. (2005). The Career Futures Inventory: A measure of career-related adaptability and optimism. Journal of Career Assessment, 13(1), 3-24.

45.

Porter, H. W. (1967). The Effect of Performance on Job Satisfaction, Industrial Relation, Oct. p.23.

46.

Rottinghaus, P. J., Day, S. X., & Borgen, F. H. (2005). The Career Futures Inventory: A measure of career-related adaptability and optimism. Journal of Career Assessment, 13(1), 3-24.

47.

Savickas, M. L., & Porfeli, E. J. (2012). Career Adapt-Abilities Scale: Construction, reliability, and measurement equivalence across 13 countries. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80(3), 661-673.

48.

Schwartz, B., Ward, A., Monterosso, J., Lyubomirsky, S., White, K., & Lehman, D. R. (2002). Maximizing versus satisficing: Happiness is a matter of choice. Journal of personality and social psychology, 83(5), 1178.

49.

Shapka, J. D., Domene, J. F., & Keating, D. P. (2006). Trajectories of career aspirations through adolescence and young adulthood: Early math achievement as a critical filter. Educational Research and Evaluation, 12(4), 347-358.

50.

Tak, J. (2012). Career Adapt-Abilities Scale—Korea Form: Psychometric properties and construct validity. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80(3), 712-715.

51.

Taylor, N. B., & Pryor, R. G. (1985). Exploring the process of compromise in career decision making. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 27(2), 171-190.

52.

Tsaousides, T., & Jome, L. (2008). Perceived career compromise, affect and work-related satisfaction in college students. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 73(2), 185-194.

53.

Warr, P. (2008). Work values: Some demographic and cultural correlates. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 81(4), 751-775.

54.

Wee, S. (2013). Development and initial validation of the Willingness to Compromise Scale. Journal of Career Assessment, 21(4), 487-501.

55.

Wee, S. (2014). Compromises in career-related decisions: Examining the role of compromise severity. Journal of counseling psychology, 61(4), 593-604.

한국심리학회지:학교