바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

Korean Journal of School Psychology

메뉴

The Relations of Middle School Students' Perceived Instructional Context, Academic Enablers, Academic Skills, and Academic Achievement

Abstract

This study was conducted to examine the relations of middle school students' perceived instructional context, academic competence and academic achievement (i.e., mid-term and final exam scores in Korean, English, Math, Social Studies, and Science). Academic competence was construed as a multidimensional construct consisting of academic enablers (i.e., motivation, interpersonal relations, engagement, self-management) and academic skills (i.e., reading, writing, math, information processing). Paper-pencil questionnaires were administered to 295 seventh graders. The results of the structural equation modeling are summarized as follows. First, in the theoretical model with all the paths depicting the influences of each latent variable on the next, 'instructional context → academic skills J and 'academic enablers → academic achievement J paths were not significant. Second, the modified model with the two non-significant paths deleted fit the data better than the competitive model with the 'instructional context → academic achievement J path deleted besides the two paths. Third, in the modified model, both the mediating effect of academic enablers in the relation between instructional context and academic skills and that of academic skills in the relation between academic enablers and academic achievement were significant. Fourth, the direct effect of instructional context on academic achievement was negative; however, as academic enablers and academic skills were assumed as mediators, such negative effect was suppressed. These results imply that the positive influences of desirable instructional context upon students' academic achievement cannot be guaranteed without the mediation of academic enablers and academic skills. Therefore, efforts to enhance students' motivational, attitudinal and behavioral characteristics and use of academic skills are essential if teachers and other school personnel intend to increase students' academic achievement by altering instructional contexts.

keywords
수업환경, 학업유능성, 학업촉진자, 학업기술, 학업성취, 관계모형, instructional context, academic competence, academic enabler, academic skill, academic achievement

Reference

1.

김아영 (2008). 한국 청소년의 학업동기 발달. 한국심리학회지: 사회문제, 14(1), 111-134.

2.

김태은, 현주 (2006). 학교급별 학업능력에 대한 학습효능감, 학습동기화, 성취목표지향성의 효과. 교육심리연구, 21(1), 185-207.

3.

문은식, 김충회 (2003). 부모의 학습지원행동과 초․중학생의 학업동기 및 학업성취도의 관계. 교육심리연구, 17(2), 271-288.

4.

박병기, 이종욱, 홍승표 (2005). 자기결정성이론이 제안한 학습동기 분류형태의 재구성. 교육심리연구, 19(3), 699-717.

5.

변영계, 김석우 (2002). 학습기술 진단검사의 실시 및 해석요강. 서울: 학지사 부설 학지심리검사연구소.

6.

신현숙 (2008). 중학생의 학업동기, 학교생활참여, 학업수행 및 학급품행의 관계. 교육연구, 31, 25-46. 전남대학교 교육문제연구소.

7.

안도희, 김지아, 황숙영 (2005). 초․중․고등학생의 학업성취에 영향을 주는 변인 탐색: 유능감, 가정의 심리적 환경 및 학교환경 특성을 중심으로. 교육심리연구, 19(4), 1199-1217.

8.

정현희 (2003). 중학교 진학 후의 심리적 부적응을 예측하는 요인. 청소년상담연구, 11(2), 36-46.

9.

홍세희 (2000). 구조방정식 모형의 적합도 지수 선정기준과 그 근거. 한국심리학회지: 임상, 19, 161-177.

10.

Anderman, E. M., Maehr, M L., & Midgley, C.(1999). Declining motivation after the transition to middle school: Schools can make a difference. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 32, 131-147.

11.

Assor, A., Kaplan, H., & Roth, G (2002). Choice is good, but relevance is excellent" Autonomy-enhancing and suppressing teacher behaviors predicting students' engagement in schoolwork. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72(2), 261-278.

12.

Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical consideration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.

13.

Bronfenbrenner, U. (1986). Ecology of the family as a context for human development: Research perspectives. Developmental Psychology, 22(6), 723-742.

14.

Caprara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C., Pastorelli, C., Bandura, A., & Zimbardo, P. G. (2000). Prosocial foundations of children's academic achievement. Psychological Science, 11(4), 302-306.

15.

Carr, M., Borkowski, J. G., & Maxwell, S. E. (1991). Motivational components of underachievement. Developmental Psychology, 27(1), 108-118.

16.

Christenson, S. L., & Anderson, A. R. (2002). Commentary: The centrality of the learning context for students' academic enabler skills. School Psychology Review, 31(3), 378-393.

17.

DiPerna, J. C. (2006). Academic enablers and student achievement: Implications for assessment and intervention services in the schools. Psychology in the Schools, 43(1), 7-17.

18.

DiPerna, J. C., & Elliott, S. N. (2000). Academic competence evaluation scales: Manual K-12. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.

19.

DiPerna, J. C., & Elliott, S. N. (2002). Promoting academic enablers to improve student achievement: An introduction to the mini-series. School Psychology Review, 31(3), 293-297.

20.

DiPerna, J. C., Volpe, R. J., & Elliott, S. N. (2002). A model of academic enablers and elementary reading/language arts achievement. School Psychology Review, 31(3), 298-312.

21.

Eccles, J. S., Midgley, C., Buchanan, C. M., Reuman, D., Flanagan, C., & MacIver, D. (1993). Development during adolescence: The impact of stage-environment fit on young adolescents' experiences in schools and in families. American Psychologist, 48, 90-101.

22.

Elliot, A. J., McGregor, H. A., & Gable, S.(1999). Achievement goals, study strategies, and exam performance: A mediational analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(3), 549-563.

23.

Eshel, Y, & Kohavi, R. (2003). Perceived classroom control, self-regulated learning strategies, and academic achievement. Educational Psychology, 23(3), 249-260.

24.

Fan, X., & Chen, M. (2001). Parental involvement and students’ academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 13, 1-22.

25.

Fenzel, L. M. (2000). Prospective study of change in global self-worth and strain during the transition to middle school. Journal of Early Adolescence, 20, 93-116.

26.

Fredericks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). Student engagement in schools: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74, 59-109.

27.

Gettinger, M., & Siebert, J. K. (2002). Contributions of study skills to academic competence. School Psychology Review, 31(3), 350-365.

28.

Goodenow, C. (1993). Classroom belonging among early adolescent students: Relationships to motivation and achievement. Journal of Early Adolescence, 13, 21-43.

29.

Greenwood, C. R. (1996). The case for performance-based models of instruction. School Psychology Quarterly, 11, 283-296.

30.

Greenwood, C. R., Horton, B. T., & Utley, C. A.(2002). Academic engagement: Current perspectives on research and practice. School Psychology Review, 31(3), 328-349.

31.

Haynes, N. M., Emmons, C., & Ben-Avie, M. (1997). School climate as a factor in student adjustment and achievement. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 8(3), 321-329.

32.

Jimerson, S., Egeland, B., & Teo, A. (1999). A longitudinal study of achievement trajectories: Factors associated with change. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(1), 116-126.

33.

Keith, T. Z. (1988). Using path analysis to test the importance of manipulable influences on school learning. School Psychology Review, 17, 637-543.

34.

Kuperminc, G. P., Leadbeater, B. J., Emmons, C., & Blatt, S. J. (1997). Perceived school climate and difficulties in the social adjustment of middle school students. Applied Developmental Science, 1(2), 76-88.

35.

Lam, S-f., & Jimerson, S. (2008). A preliminary analysis on exploring student engagement in school internationally. Paper presented in the 2008 International School Psychology Association (ISPA) Colloquium in Utrecht.

36.

Lam, S-f., Pak, T. S., & Ma, W. Y. K. (2007). Motivating instructional contexts inventory. P. R. Zelick (Ed.), Issues in the Psychology of Motivation (pp.119-136). Huppauge, NJ: Nova Science.

37.

Lepper, M. R., Corpus, J. H., & Iyengar, S. S.(2005). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations in the classroom. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(2), 184-196.

38.

Linnenbrink, E. A., & Pintrich, P. R. (2002). Motivation as an enabler for academic success. School Psychology Review, 31(3), 313-327.

39.

Loukas, A., & Robinson, S. (2004). Examining the moderating role of perceived school climate in early adolescent adjustment. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 14(2), 209-233.

40.

Merrell, K. W., Ervin, R. A., & Gimpel, G. A.(2008). 21세기를 위한 학교심리학 [School psychology for the 21st century: Foundations and practices]. (이승연, 신현숙 역). 서울: 시그마프레스. (원전은 2006에 출판)

41.

Midgley, C., Feldlaufer, H., & Eccles, J. (1989). Student/teacher relations and attitudes toward mathematics before and after the transition to junior high school. Child Development, 60, 981-992.

42.

Preacher, K. J., & Leonardelli, G. J. (2006). Calculation for the Sobel test: An interactive calculation tool for mediation tests. Retrieved from http://people.ku.edu/~preacher/sobel/sobel.htm Rivkin, S. G., Hanushek, E. A., & Kain, J. F. (2005). Teachers, schools, and academic achievement. Econometrica, 73(2), 417-458.

43.

Roeser, R. W., & Eccles, J. S. (1998). Adolescents’ perceptions of middle school: Relation to longitudinal changes in academic and psychological adjustment. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 8(1), 123-158.

44.

Urdan, T., & Midgley, C. (2003). Changes in the perceived classroom goal structure and pattern of adaptive learning during early adolescence. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28, 524-551.

45.

Walberg, H. J. (1981). A psychological theory of educational productivity. In F. H. Farley & N. Gordon (Eds.), Psychology and Education (pp.81-110). Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education.

46.

Wang, M C., Haertel, G. D., & Walberg, H. J. (1993). Toward a knowledge base for school learning. Review of Educational Research, 63, 249-294.

47.

Wentzel, K. R. (1993). Does being good make the grade? Social behavior and academic competence in middle school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 357-364.

48.

Wentzel, K. R., & Watkins, D. E. (2002). Peer relationships and collaborative learning as contexts for academic enablers. School Psychology Review, 31(3), 366-377.

49.

Wong, E. H., Wiest, D. J., & Cusick, I. B. (2002). Perceptions of autonomy support, parent attachment, competence and self-worth as predictors of motivational orientation and academic achievement: An examination of sixth- and ninth-grade regular education students. Adolescence, 37(146), 255-266.

Korean Journal of School Psychology