한국판 아동․청소년행동평가 척도 교사용(TRF) 표준화 연구
Standardization Study for the Korean Version of the Teacher's Report Form
김영아 ((주)휴노)
오경자 (연세대학교)
초록
본 연구에서는 한국판 아동․청소년 행동평가척도 교사용(TRF)을 표준화하고 신뢰도 및 타당도를 검증하였다. 한국판 TRF의 규준집단(남학생 476명, 여학생 462명)은 2005년 대한민국 인구 및 주택 총조사 자료를 참조하여 수집하였다. 확인적 요인분석 결과는 미국판 원검사의 요인구조를 한국판에도 동일하게 적용할 수 있음을 시사하였고, 각 하위척도들의 내적 합치도 수준(Cronbach’s α=.59-.97, 기타문제: .39)과 검사-재검사 신뢰도 값(.53-.96)이 모두 양호하였다. 내재화 및 외현화 척도에 속하는 하위 척도들과 상위 척도가 높은 상관을 보였고, 한국판 CBCL 6-18을 준거타당도 척도로 활용하여 TRF총점기준 비임상/임상 집단 간의 평균차이를 확인한 결과, 대부분의 척도에서 TRF총점기준 임상 집단이 비임상 집단보다 높은 점수를 나타내는 경향을 보였다. 단축형 Conners 척도와 관련이 있는 TRF의 척도 간에도 .77-.92 사이의 높은 상관관계를 보이는 것으로 나타나 수렴타당도 및 변별타당도를 지지하였다. 각 하위척도별 평균 점수를 학년급간과 성별에 따라 비교한 결과 초등/중·고등 학년급간과 남/여 성별에 따라 규준을 제시하는 것이 적합한 것으로 나타났다. 한국판 TRF의 임상 및 연구 장면에서의 활용에 대한 논의가 이루어졌다.
- keywords
- 한국판 TRF, 아동·청소년 문제행동, 행동평가척도, 표준화, 신뢰도, 타당도, Teacher's Report Form, child behavior problems, school-age, standardization
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to develop the norms and test the reliability and validity of the Korean version of the Teacher's Report Form (TRF). The selection of a normative sample for the TRF (476 boys and 462 girls) was based on data from the 2005 Korean Population and Housing Census. A confirmatory factor analysis supported that the factor structure of the original TRF can be plausibly applied to the Korean version of the TRF. Reliability was assessed in terms of internal consistency (.59-.97; other problems: .39) and test-retest reliability (.53-.96). The subscales of the TRF showed high correlations with its higher-order-factors such as internalizing and externalizing problems, and this provided good evidence of convergent validity. When the TRF was administered to a clinical sample (n=101) and normative sample (n=506), discriminant validity was confirmed by the mean differences on the subscales between the two samples. When differences in mean subscale scores for different age and sex groups were explored, it would be reasonable to use independent norms for two age groups (the first year ~ the sixth year of elementary school / middle school freshman ~ high school senior) and gender (boys / girls) for the Korean version of the TRF. The implications of using the TRF in Korea both as a clinical tool and a research instrument are discussed.
- keywords
- 한국판 TRF, 아동·청소년 문제행동, 행동평가척도, 표준화, 신뢰도, 타당도, Teacher's Report Form, child behavior problems, school-age, standardization
참고문헌
구미향, 이양희 (2003). 아동기 두려움과 행동문제의 특성 및 관련성 탐색. 초등교육연구, 16(1), 341-363.
김 연, 황혜정 (2005). 부모와 자녀가 지각한촉진적 의사소통이 아동의 문제행동에 미치는 영향. 열린유아교육학회, 10(4), 69-88.
김영아, 이 진, 김유진, 김민영, 오경자 (2011).한국판 유아행동평가 척도 교사용(C-TRF)의 표준화 연구. 한국심리학회지: 발달,24(2), 65-86.
김영아, 이 진, 문수종, 김유진, 오경자 (2009).한국판 CBCL 1.5-5의 표준화 연구. 한국심리학회: 임상, 28(1), 117-136.
서울시 소아청소년 광역 정신보건센터 (2006).서울시 소아청소년 정신장애 유병률 조사: 2005년도 역학사업보고서.
소유경, 노주선, 김영신, 고선규, 고윤주 (2002).한국어판 부모, 교사 ADHD 평가 척도의신뢰도와 타당도 연구. 신경정신의학,41(2), 283-289.
신현숙, 박용재, 박주희, 류정희 (2006). 교사보고형 초등학생 학교적응행동 평정척도의개발과 타당도 검증. 한국심리학회지: 학교, 3(2), 1-26.
연합뉴스 (2009.08.23). 초중고생 13% 정신건강적신호.
연합뉴스 (2011.08.22). 청소년, 정신건강 문제늘었다.
오경자, 김영아 (2011). ASEBA 아동청소년 행동평가척도 매뉴얼. 서울: (주)휴노.
오경자, 이혜련 (1989). 주의력 결핍 과잉 활동증 평가도구로서의 단축형 Conners 평가척도의 활용. 한국심리학회지: 임상, 8(1),135-142.
오경자, 이혜련, 홍강의, 하은혜 (1997). KCBCL아동․청소년 행동평가검사. 서울:중앙적성 출판사.
오경자, 하은혜, 이혜련, 홍강의 (2001). KYSR청소년 자기행동 평가척도. 서울: 중앙적성출판사.
이경님 (2002). 청소년의 애착, 자아존중감 및충동통제가 비행에 미치는 영향. 대한가정학회지, 40(8), 191-206.
이준석, 조광순 (2004). 국내 영․유아 발달 선별 및 진단 검사도구에 대한 고찰: 표준화중인 검사도구들을 중심으로. 특수교육저널: 이론과 실천, 5(1), 1-26.
장휘숙 (1997). 청소년기의 애착과 자아존중감및 자기효능감의 관계. 인간발달연구, 4(1),88-106.
정현희 (2002). 한국판 교사용-아동평정척도(T-CRS)의 신뢰도와 타당도. 한국심리학회지: 발달, 15(2), 73-88.
통계청 (2006). 2005년 대한민국 인구 및 주택총조사.
Achenbach, T. M. (1991). Integrative Guide for the 1991 CBCL/4-18, YSR, and TRF Profiles. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont, Department of Psychiatry.
Achenbach, T. M., Bird, H. R., Canino, G., Phares, V., Bould, M. S., & Rubio-Stipec, M. (1990). Epidemiological Comparisons of Puerto Rican and U.S. Mainland Children: Parent, Teacher, and Self-Reports. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 29(1), 84-93.
Achenbach, T. M., & Rescorla, L. A. (2000). Manual for ASEBA Preschool Forms & Profiles. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont, Research Center for Children, Youth, & Families.
Achenbach, T. M., & Rescorla, L. A. (2001). Manual for the ASEBA School-Age Forms and Profiles. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont Research Center for Children, Youth, and Families.
Byrne, B. M. (2001). Structural equation modelling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications and programming. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Cai, X., Kaiser, A. P., & Hancock, T. B. (2004). Parent and teacher agreement on Child Behavior Checklist items in a sample of preschoolers from low-income and predominantly African American families. Journal of Clinical Adolescent Psychology, 33, 303-312.
Cantwell, D. P., Lewinsohn, P. M., Rohde, P., & Seeley, J. R. (1997). Correspondence Between Adolescent Report and Parent Report of Psychiatric Diagnostic Data. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 36(5), 610-619.
Cassidy, J., & Asher, S. R. (1992). Loneliness and peer relations in young children. Child Development, 63, 350-365.
Conners, C. K. (1973). Rating scales for use in drug studies with children. Psychopharmacology Bulletin (Special Issue, Pharmacotherapy of Children), 24-29.
Dedrick, Tan, & Marfo (2008). Factor structure of the Child Behavior Checklist/6-18 in a sample of girls adopted from China. Psychological Assessment, 20, 70-75.
Delaney-Black, Covington, Templin, Ager, Nordstrom-Klee, Martier, Leddick, Czerwinski, & Sokol (2000). Teacher-assessed behavior of children prenatally exposed cocaine. Pediatrics, 106, 782-791.
Goyette, C. H., Conners, C. K., & Ulrich, R. F. (1978). Normative data on the revised Conners parent and teacher rating scales. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 6, 221-236.
Gresham F. M., & Elliott, S. N. (1990). Manual for the Social Skills Rating System. Circle Pines MN: American Guidance Service.
Holye, R. H. (1995). The structural equation modelling approach: Basic concepts and fundamental issues. In R.H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modelling, concepts, issues, and applications (pp.1-15). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Hops, H. (1983). Children's social competence and skill: Current research practices and future directions. Behavior Therapy, 14(1), 3-18.
Kemper, T. S., Gerhardstein, R., Repper, K. K., & Kistner, J. A. (2003). Mother–Child Agreement on Reports of Internalizing Symptoms Among Children Referred for Evaluation of ADHD. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 25(4), 239-250.
Kumpulainen, K,, Rasanen, E., Henttonen, I., Moilanen, I., Piha, J., Puura, K,, Tamminen, T., & Almqvist, F. (1999). Children’s behavioral/emotional problems: A comparison of parents’ and teachers’ reports for elementary school-aged children. European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 8, 41-47.
Little, T. D., Cunningham, W. A., Shahar, G., & Widaman, K. F. (2002). To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question and weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 151-173.
McGee, R., Silva, P. A., & Williams, S. (1984). Behaviour problems in a population of sevenyear-old children: Prevalence, stability, and types of disorder-a research report. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 25, 251-259.
Mychailyszy, Mendez, & Kendall (2010). School Functioning in Youth with and without Anxiety Disorders: Comparisons by Diagnosis and Comorbidity. School Psychology Review, 39(1), 106-121.
Phares, V. (1997). Accuracy of informants: Do parents think that mother knows best? Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 25, 165-171.
Quay, H. C., & Peterson, D. R. (1987). Manual for the Revised Behavior Problem Checklist. Available from the senior author at P. O. Box 248074, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL 33124.
Rescorla, L. A., Achenbach, T. M., Ivanova, M. Y., Dumenci, L., Almqvist, F., Bilenberg, N., Bird, H., Broberg, A., Dobrean, A., Döpfner, M., Erol, N., Forns, M., Hannesdottir, H., Kanbayashi, Y., Lambert, M. C.Leung, P., Minaei, A., Mulatu, M. S., Novik, T. S., Oh, K., Roussos, A., Sawyer, M., Simsek, Z., Steinhausen, H., Weintraub, S., Metzke, C. W., Wolanczyk, T., Zilber, N., Zukauskiene, R., Verhulst, F. (2007). Epidemiological comparisons of problems and positive qualities reported by adolescents in 24 countries. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 75, 351-358.
Reynolds, C. R., & Kamphaus, R. W. (1992). BASC: Behavior assessment system for children. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
Segars, A. H., & Grover, V. (1993). Re-examining perceived ease of use and usefulness: A confirmatory factor analysis. MIS Quarterly, 17, 517-525.
Somers, T., Nelson, K., & Karimi, J. (2003). Confirmatory factor analysis of the end-user computing satisfaction instrument: Replication within an ERP domain. Decision Sciences, 34, 595-621.
Stanger, C., & Lewis, M. (1993). Agreement among parents, teachers and children on internalizing and externalizing behavior problems. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 22, 107-116.
Stevens, G. W. J. M., Pels, T., Bengi-Arslan, L., Verhulst, F. C., Vollebergh, W. A. M., & Crijnen, A. A. M. (2003). Parent, teacher and self-reported problem behavior in The Netherlands Comparing Moroccan immigrant with Dutch and with Turkish immigrant children and adolescents. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 38(10), 576-585.
Uitenbroek, D. G. (1997). “SISA Binomial,” uthampton: D. G. Uitenbroek. Retrieved 1 January, 2004, from the World Wide Web: http://home.clara.net/sisa/binomial.htm.
Weisz, J. R., Suwanlert, S., Chaiyasit, W., Weiss, B., Achenbach, T. M., & Trevathan, D. (1989). Epidemiology of Behavioral and Emotional Problems among Thai and American Children: Teacher Reports for Ages 6-11. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 30(3), 471-484.
Winsler, A., & Wallace, G. L. (2002). Behavior problems and social skills in preschool children: Parent-teacher agreement and relations with classroom observations. Early Education and Development, 13, 41-58.
Youngstrom, E., Loeber, R., & Stouthamer-Loeber, M. (2000). Patterns and correlates of agreement between parent, teacher, and male adolescent ratings of externalizing and internalizing problems. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68, 1038-1050.
- 다운로드 수
- 조회수
- 0KCI 피인용수
- 0WOS 피인용수