- P-ISSN 1225-0163
- E-ISSN 2288-8985
As a traditional method to apply fingerprint powder, brush method (“dusting”) can create a risk to the health of crime scene investigators due to the inhalation toxicity of harmful and fine powders. Therefore, as a new method of applying powders, we tried to evaluate the potential of a chamber method for the development of latent fingerprint using fans in a closed chamber with a fixed capacity that can prevent the powders from being blown outside and exposed to the users, by comparing with the development results of the conventional brush method. Fingerprints on glass and plastic (PET) were extracted with black powder and green fluorescent powder, and the sharpness and minutiae of the developed fingerprints were compared for each method. The results of the black powder showed similar results, but the effect of the chamber method was slightly decreased when the green fluorescent powder was used. In order to improve the development with the green fluorescent powder, the mixture (50 : 50) of the fluorescent powder with the silica gel was tested and the results were similar to those of the brush method. It is expected that the chamber method has a high potential as a new powder application method considering the health of the crime scene investigator after fine tuning of development conditions with additional studies.
1. C. Huynh and J. Halámek, Trends Anal. Chem., 82, 328-336 (2016).
2. C. Champod, C. J. Lennard, P. Margot, and M. Stoilovic, ‘Fingerprints and other ridge skin impressions’, 2nd Ed., CRC press, 2016.
3. A. Knowles, J. Phys. Educ., 11(8), 713 (1978).
4. M. Y. Omar and L. Ellsworth, Sains. Malays., 41(4), 499-504 (2012).
5. G. S. Sodhi and J. Kaur, Forensic Sci. Int., 120(3), 172-176 (2001).
6. C. Van Netten, K. Teschke, and F. Souter, Arch. Environ. Occup. H., 45(2), 123-127 (1990).
7. P. Malik and G. Singh, Forensic Sci. Policy Manage., 2(1), 1-4 (2011).
8. K.-H. Kim, E. Kabir, and S. Kabir, Environ. Int., 74, 136-143 (2015).
9. W. J. Kim, S. Y. Lee, and J. S. Cheong, Korean Police Stud. Rev., 12(4), 63-86 (2013).
10. F. Souter, C. Van Netten, and R. Brands, Int. J. Environ. Health Res., 2(2), 114-119 (1992).
11. S. D. Kim and M. J. Choi, J. Sci. Criminal Investig., 7, 33-41 (2013).
12. R. E. Gaensslen, R. Ramotowski, and H. C. Lee, ‘Advances in fingerprint technology’, CRC press, 2001.
13. H. C. Lee and R. E. Gaensslen, ‘Advances in fingerprint technology’, Elsevier, New York, 1991.
14. J. James, C. Pounds, and B. Wilshire, J. Forensic Identif., 41(4), 237-247 (1991).
15. J. James, C. Pounds, and B. Wilshire, J. Forensic Sci., 36(5), 1376-1386 (1991).
16. B. Wilshire, Endeav., 20(1), 12-15 (1996).
17. J. Perez-Avila, Fingerprint Sourcebook-Chapter 11:Equipment, US Department of Justice, Washington DC, 2011.
18. S. Bleay, V. Sears, H. Bandey, A. Gibson, V. Bowman, R. Downham, L. Fitzgerald, T. Ciuksza, J. Ramadani, and C. Selway, Home Office Center for Applied Science Technology (CAST), 2012.
19. G. Sodhi, G. Gupta, and J. Kaur, Res. Pract. Forensic Med., 40, 121-123 (1997).
20. Roy, Provisional British Patent No. 27769, 1975.
21. E. A. Barton and R. M. Dameron, Latent fingerprint powder applicator and related method of use, U.S. Patent Application No. 12/890,285, 2012.
22. H. J. Swofford and A. T. Kovalchick, J. Forensic Identif., 62(2), 109 (2012).
23. V. Sears, S. Bleay, H. Bandey, and V. Bowman, Sci. Justice, 52(3), 145-160 (2012).
24. T. Kent, J. Forensic Identif., 60(3), 371 (2010).
25. J. H. Cho, H. W. Kim, M. S. Kim, and S. W. Choi, Anal. Sci. Technol., 29(3), 142-153 (2016).
26. E. M. Lee, B. R. Heo, Y. S. Ok, J. K. Kim, I. N. Joung, and S. W. Choi, Anal. Sci. Technol., 29(6), 283-292(2016).
27. M. Wang, M. Li, A. Yu, J. Wu, and C. Mao, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 7(51), 28110-28115 (2015).
28. S. Moret, X. Spindler, C. Lennard, and C. Roux, Forensic Sci. Int., 255, 28-37 (2015).
29. K. Singh, S. Sharma, and R. K. Garg, Egypt J. Forensic Sci., 3(1), 20-25 (2013).