open access
메뉴
open access
메뉴
E-ISSN : 2733-4538
This study evaluated and compared the operating characteristics and efficiencies of PAI positive and negative distortion indexes developed in America and Korea. Adults in a community administered PAI under three conditions: positive impression instruction, negative impression instruction, and standard instruction. The profile of negative dissimulation was elevated, while the profile of positive dissimulation was lower than that of standard instruction. Among indicators of positive distortion, KDF, PIM, and DEF were higher on positive impression instruction than negative impression instruction and standard instruction. Four indicators of negative distortion were all elevated on negative impression instruction. In calculation of the estimate of efficiency through ROC analysis, KMDF (AUC=.89), NIM raw score (AUC=.89), MAL (AUC=.83), PIM raw score (AUC=.72), DEF (AUC=.72) were fair. Review of the identification rate estimates for each cutoff score indicated that the sum of sensitivity and specificity on specific cutoff score of PIM raw score, DEF, KDF were high, however, that of Cashel Index was relatively low, and KMDF, NIM raw score, Rogers Index, and MAL were all high. These results suggest that, except for the Cashel index, indicators developed in America and Korea are all effective in detection of positive and negative impression management. Other implications and limitations are discussed.
김영환, 김지혜, 오상우, 임영란, 홍상황 (2001). 성격평가 질문지 실시요강. 서울: 학지사.
김영환, 오상우, 홍상황, 박은영 (2002). PAI 임상적 해석. 서울: 학지사.
홍상황, 김영환 (2001). PAI 무선반응과 인상관리의 탐지: Ⅱ. 탐지지표의 구성을 중심으로. 한국심리학회지: 임상, 20, 751-761.
홍상황, 박은영, 김영환 (2001). PAI 무선반응과 인상관리의 탐지: 타당성척도의 분할점수를 중심으로. 한국심리학회지: 임상, 20, 165-177.
Bagby, R. M., Nicholson, R. A., Bacchiochi, J. R., Ryder, A. G. & Bury, A. S. (2002). The predictive capacity of the MMPI-2 and PAI validity scales and indexed to detect coached and uncoached feigning. Journal of Personality Assessment, 78, 69-86.
Cashel, M. L., Rogers, R., Sewell, K., & Martin-Cannici, C. (1995). The Personality Assessment Inventory and the detection of defensiveness. Assessment, 2, 333-342.
Green, R. L. (1997). Assessment of malingering and defensiveness by multiscale personality inventories. In Rogers (Eds.), Clinical assessment of malingering and deception. (2nd ed., pp. 169-207). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
Lanyon, R. I., Dannenbaum, S. E., Wolf, L. L., & Brown, A. R. (1989). Dimensions of deceptive responding in criminal offenders. Psychological Assessment, 1, 300-304.
Meehl, P. E. (1945). An investigation of a general normality or control factor in personality testing. Psychological Monographs, 274.
Morey, L. C. (1991). Personality Assesment Inventory Manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
Morey, L. C. (1996). An interpretive guide to the Personality Assessment Inventory. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
Morey, L. C., & Lanier, V. W. (1998). Operating characteristics for six response distortion indicators for the Personality Assessment Inventory. Assessment, 5, 203-214.
Peebles, J., & Moore, R. J. (1998). Detecting socially desirable responding with the Personality Assessment Inventory: The Positive Impression Management scale and the Defensiveness index. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 54, 621-628.
Rogers, R. (1997). Clinical assessment of malingering and deception (2nd ed). New York: Guilford.
Rogers, R., Sewell, K. W., Morey, L. C., & Ustad, K. L. (1996). Detection of feigned mental disorders on the Personality Assessment Inventory: A discriminant analysis. Journal of Personality Assessment, 5, 3-12.
Scragg, P., Bor, R., & Mendham, M. C. (2002). Feigning post-traumatic stress disorder on the PAI. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 7, 155-160.