바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

Difference of Impulsivity and Flow experience according to the internet addiction and Internet usage type

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine differences of impulsivity and flow experience according to internet addiction and internet usage type. A total of 486 undergraduate students participated in this study. They were asked to complete questionnaires concerned with the Internet addiction scale_(K-scale); 38 subjects were selected for inclusion in the ‘addiction group’, and 38 subjects were included in the ‘normal control group’. In the lab, subjects were given an Experiential Discounting task, BIS-11 scale, and Flow experience scale. The results showed significant correlation between delay discounting task and BIS-11, and, when two tasks were used together, explanation power regarding internet addiction increased. We also examined the differences according to the internet addiction and usage type. The results indicated that there was interaction between internet addiction and usage type on delay discounting task. Subjects in the Internet addiction group showed a lower indifference point and AUC value, indicating that they were impulsive and have difficulty in gratification of delay. Game group in normal controls was also impulsive. However, no interaction between internet addiction tendency and usage type was observed on the self-reported scale. Finally, we examined flow experience. The results indicated a difference in total score according to internet addiction, whereas no difference was observed according to usage type and there was no interaction effect. These results suggest that subjects in the normal control group can also show behavioral impulsivity according to usage type and show different aspects according to characteristic of impulsivity tasks. Also, web-surfing type as well as game type showed significant flow experience in the internet addiction group. Finally, more implications and limitations were discussed.

keywords
인터넷 중독, 지연 디스카운팅 과제, 충동성, 플로우, Internet addiction, delay-discounting task, impulsivity, Flow

Reference

1.

성한기, 안경옥 (2005). 인터넷 사용유형과 중독수준에 따른 친구관계 및 가상공간의 현실지각. 한국심리학회지: 건강, 10(4), 475-488.

2.

송원영 (1999). 자기효능감과 자기통제력이 인터넷의 중독적 사용에 미치는 영향. 연세대학교 대학원 석사학위논문.

3.

유영달 (2002). 인터넷 중독 유형에 따른 청소년의 자아정체감, 우울, 충동성의 차이. 계명대학교 교육대학원 석사학위논문.

4.

윤재희 (1998). 인터넷 중독과 우울, 충동성, 감각추구성향 및 대인관계의 연관성. 고려대학교 대학원 석사학위논문.

5.

이순묵, 반재천, 이형초, 최윤경, 이순영 (2005). 성인 인터넷 중독 진단 척도 개발연구. 한국정보화진흥원.

6.

이영호, 송종용 (1991). BDI, SDS, MMPI-2 척도의 신뢰도 및 타당도에 대한 연구. 한국심리학회지: 임상, 10(1), 98-113.

7.

이인혜 (2001). 기능적 충동성과 역기능적 충동성의 성격적 및 인지적 특징. 한국심리학회지: 일반, 21(1), 67-89.

8.

이인혜, 이혜경 (2009). 병리적 인터넷 사용 하위 유형과 성격특성 -PC방 이용자를 중심으로-. 사회과학연구, 15(2), 473-509.

9.

이현수 (1994). 충동성의 유형. 중앙대학교 인문학 연구, 21, 93-104.

10.

이형초, 최윤경, 이순묵, 반재천, 이순영 (2007). 성인 인터넷 병리적 사용의 행동증상에 대한 자기 보고형 척도 개발. 한국심리학회지: 임상, 26(3), 765-791.

11.

전혜연, 현명호, 전영민 (2011). 인터넷 중독 성향자의 전두엽 실행 기능의 특징. 한국심리학회지: 건강, 16(1), 215-229.

12.

정연옥, 이철원 (1997). Barratt 충동성 검사의 요인구조: 대학생 집단자료를 중심으로. 한국심리학회지: 임상, 16(1), 117-129

13.

조용진 (2002). 청소년들의 컴퓨터 게임 중독현상에 관한 연구: 플로우(Flow) 및 개인적 성향을 중심으로. 중앙대학교 대학원 석사학위 논문.

14.

한국정보화진흥원 (2011). 2010년 인터넷 중독 실태조사. http://www.nia.or.kr

15.

Barratt, E. S. (1993). Impulsivity; Intergrating cognitive, behavioral, biological and environmental data. In W. McCowan, J. Johnson, & M. Shure, The impulsive client; Theory, research, and treatment. Washington, D. C.: American Psychological Association.

16.

Baumeister, R, F., Vohs, K. D., & Funder, D. C. (2007). Psychology as the science of self-reports and finger movements: whatever happened to actual behavior? Association for Psychological Science, 2(4), 396-403.

17.

Bickel W. K., Odum, A. L., & Madden, G. J. (1999). Impulsivity and cigarette smoking: Delay discounting in current, never, and ex-smokers. Psychopharmacology, 165, 447-454.

18.

Brady R., & Ryan S. (2004). Measuring state changes in human delay discounting: an experiential discounting task. Behavioural Process, 67, 343-356.

19.

Bryan K. S., Amanda G., & Jason K. (2010). Internet addiction and delay discounting in college students. The Psychological Record, 60, 273-286.

20.

Cao, F., Su, L., Liu, T., & Gao, X. (2007). The relationship between impulsivity and Internet addiction in a sample of Chinese adolescents. European Psychiatry, 22, 466-471.

21.

Chen, H., Wigand, R. T., & Nilan, M. (1999). Flow activites on the Web, Computers in Human Behavior, 15(5), 585-608.

22.

Chin-Sheng Wan & Wen-Bin Chiou (2006). Psychological Motives and Online Games Addiction: A Test of Flow theory and Humanistic Needs theory for Taiwanese Adolescents. Cyber Psychology & Behavior, 9(3), 317-324.

23.

Choi, D., & Kim, J. (2004). Why people continue to play online games: In search of critical design factors to increase customers loyalty to online contents. Cyber Psychology & Behavior, 7, 11-24.

24.

Chou, T. J., & Ting, C. C. (2003). The role of flow experience in cyber-game addiction. Cyber Psychology & Behavior, 6, 663-675.

25.

Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience, Harrer & Row, New york, NY.

26.

Dixon, M. R., Marley, J., & Jacobs, E. A. (2003). Delay discounting by pathological gamblers. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 36, 449- 458.

27.

Dixon, M. R., Jacobs, E. A., & Sanders, S. (2006). Contextual control of delay discounting by pathological gamblers. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 39, 413-422.

28.

Goldsmith, T. D., & Shapira, N. A. (2006). Problematic Internet use. In E. Hollander & D.. J. stein(Eds.), Clinical manual of impulse- control disorders, 291-308.

29.

Hisang Chen, Rolf T. Wigand, & Michael Nilan (2000). Exploring Web users' optimal flow experiences. Information Technology & people 13(4), 263-281.

30.

Hoffman, D. L., Novak, T., & Yung, Y. F. (1998). Measuring the Flow construct in online environment: A structure Modeling Approach, Unpublished Working paper, http://www.2000.ogsm.vanderbilt.edu

31.

Holden, C. (2010). Behavioral addictions debut in proposed DSM-V. Science, 327, 935-935.

32.

Kim, E. J., Namkyung, K., Ku, T., & Kim, S, J. (2008). The relationship between online game addiction and aggression, self-control and narcissistic personality traits. European Psychiatry, 23, 212-218.

33.

Kirby, K. N., Petry. N. M., & Bickel, W. K. (1999). Heroin addicts have higher discount rates for delayed rewards than non-drug-using controls. Journal of Experimental Psycology, 128(1), 78-87.

34.

Mahoney, J. M. (1974). Self Reward and Self Monitoring Technigues for Weight Control. Behavioral Therapy, 5, 48-57.

35.

Mitchell, S. H. (1999). Measures of impulsivity in cigarette smokers and non-smokers. Psychopharmacology, 146, 455-464.

36.

O' Brien, C. P. (2010). Commentary on Tao et al.; Internet addiction and DSM-V. Addiction 105. 565-565.

37.

Rachlin, H. (2000). The Science of Self control. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

38.

Vuchinich, R. E., & Simpson, C. A. (1998). Hyperbolic temporal discounting in social drinkers and problem drinkers. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 6, 292-305.

39.

Treuer, T., Fabian, Z., & Furedi, J. (2001). Internet addiction associated with features of impulse control disorder: Is it a real psychiatric disorder? Journal of Affective Disorders, 66, 283.

40.

Yellowlees, P. M., & Marks, S. (2007). Problematic Internet use or Internet addiction? Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 1447-1453.

41.

Young (1998). Caught in the Net: How to recognize the signs of Internet Addiction and a winning strategy for recovery, New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

logo