바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

메뉴

Research Ethics and Laws Related to Survey Research in Clinical Psychology

Abstract

Psychologists explore human behavior using scientific methods. The survey method is the most cost efficient research methods psychologists use. Clinical psychology research papers, including most research articles published by the Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology, frequently employ this method, which includes psychological assessment tools. However, the survey method is regulated by several laws, such as the research ethics law, bioethics law, copyright law, and privacy law. The whole structure and every elements of a survey comprise the expressions that are protected by the copyright law and the respondents of the survey are human subjects who are protected by the bioethics laws. The collected data in the survey contain personal information protected by the privacy law, and the resultant research paper is governed by the research ethics law. This study examined these laws from clinical psychologists’ perspective. Although ethics should encompass most laws, the ethical principles for the Korean Association of Clinical Psychology were poorly connected to related laws; the code of conduct are unclear and inconsistent compared to related laws, and they do not represent the core concept and general principles of Ethics (respect for human dignity and integrity). A comprehensive, active revision of the ethics laws for clinical psychologists is required to match the trends of related laws; furthermore, proactive action and discussion among psychologists is needed.

keywords
psychological assessment, survey, copyright law, bioethics law, privacy law, research ethics, 설문지, 심리평가도구, 저작권법, 생명윤리법, 개인정보보호법, 연구윤리

Reference

1.

American Counseling Association. (2014). 2014 Code of ethics. Retrieved from https://www.counseling.org/docs/default-source/ethics/2014-code-of-ethics.pdf?sfvrsn=2d58522c_4.

2.

American Psychological Association. (2001). Publication manual of the American psychological association (6th ed.). Washington, DC: American PsychologicalAssociation.

3.

Chung, B. (2010). Search for implementation for the establishment of research ethics. Korean and Culture, 10, 295-314.

4.

Hong, S. G. (2015). Current status of copyright law in Korea and suggestions. Korea Copyright Commission. Retrievedfrom https://www.copyright.or.kr/kcc/common/cpis/file/displayImage.do?fileNo=5489.

5.

Jellinek, G. (1878; 2nd ed., 1908). Die sozialethische Bedeutung von Recht, Unrecht und Strafe {The social-ethical meaning of law, injustice and punishment}. Berlin: Verlag von O. Häring.

6.

Jensen, B. J., & Haynes, S. N. (1986). Self-report questionnaires. In A. R. Ciminero, C. S. Calhoun, & H. E. Adams (Eds.), Handbook of Behavioral Assessmet (2nd., pp. 150-175). New York, NY: Wiley.

7.

Kim, H. (2006). Society by rules and principles. The Science & Technology, 39, 76-77.

8.

Kim, H. S. (2015). Critical retrospection on National Bioethics Committee. Forum for Bioethics, 4, 1-7.

9.

Kim, M. (2012). Dealing with ethical issues in the fields of health psychology. The Korean Journal of Health Psychology, 17, 767-780.

10.

Korean Clinical Psychology Association. (2018). Submission guideline. Retrieved from http://www.kcp.or.kr/sub04_3_1.asp?menu-Category=4.

11.

Korean Psychological Association. (2012). Publication manual. Seoul: Pakyoungsa.

12.

Lee, D. (2000). A comparative law study on fair use in copyright law. Business Administration and Law, 10, 341-361.

13.

Lee, I. (2007). The Understanding of citation and plagiarism for establishment of the research ethics. Ethics Research, 66, 1-25.

14.

Lee, I. (2009). Problems of redundant publication and the establishment ways of research ethics. Korean, Korean Society of Philosophical History, 26, 305-323.

15.

Ministry of Education. (2015). Revision of research ethics. Retrieved from https://www.moe.go.kr/boardCnts/view.do?boardID=294&boardSeq=61183&lev=0&searchType=S&statusYN=W&page=90&s=moe&m=0503&opType=.

16.

Ministry of Education. (2018). Prevention of inadequate authorship. Retrieved from http://moe.go.kr/boardCnts/view.do?boardID=294&boardSeq=74863&lev=0&searchType=null&statusYN=W&page=1&s=moe&m=0503&opType=N.

17.

Myers, D. G. (2004). Psychology (ed.), New York, NY,: Worth Publishers.

18.

Nachimas, C., & Nachimas, D. (1981). Research methods in the social sciences (2nd ed.). New York: St. Martin’s Press.

19.

Nam, H. D. (2015). Plagiarism. Seoul: Hyunamsa.

20.

National Research Foundation of Korea. (2014). Publication manual for engineering research. Retrieved from http://www.cre.or.kr/board/download.php?board=textbook&no=1384677&file_no=3922.

21.

National Research Foundation of Korea. (2015). Manual for research ethics. Retrieved from http://www.cre.or.kr/board/download.php?board=textbook&no=1386453&file_no=6010.

22.

Science. (2006). Editorial retraction. Retrieved from http://science.sciencemag.org/content/311/5759/335.2.

logo