바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

  • P-ISSN1013-0799
  • E-ISSN2586-2073
  • KCI

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.23 No.1

Citation Share

An Analysis Model for Journal Evaluation in Special Libraries

Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management / Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, (P)1013-0799; (E)2586-2073
2006, v.23 no.1, pp.121-138
https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2006.23.1.121


& (2006). An Analysis Model for Journal Evaluation in Special Libraries. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 23(1), 121-138, https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2006.23.1.121

Abstract

This study attempts to derive an economic analysis model for journal evaluation and conducts a case analysis based on the model. Total costs are calculated and include administrative fees (such as binding, ordering, claiming, etc.) and subscription costs. The model quantifies qualitative benefits to users, a utility that combines usage data that has also been evaluated in the existing economic analysis models. The model is designed to tallly the usage statistics of the web-based electronic journals, which have become important resources for research. Rankings are assigned based on how items are utilized to the goal of the mother institution. In the case study based on the KDI School Library, the highest ranking of 3 was assigned to journals that patrons used for citation in their outputs. For journals that were used background information, i.e. full text downloading or browsing, each was assigned ranking of 2 and 1, respectively. According to the analysis, the top 20 journals provided 75% of the entire library utility, showing different user behaviors among different cohorts. We expect that the model makes it possible for librarians to measure the value of journals. It can provide a basic tool for journal selection, particularly in special libraries with custom needs.

keywords
Special Libraries, Utility, Economic Analysis Model, Electronic Journals, Citation, Full text downloading, 전문도서관, 유용성, 경제성 분석 모형, 전자 학술지, 인용, 전문 다운로드, Special Libraries, Utility, Economic Analysis Model, Electronic Journals, Citation, Full text downloading

Reference

1.

김석영. (2001). 과학기술분야 해외 학술지의 비용대 효과 분석. 한국문헌정보학회지, 35(1), 249-264.

2.

심원식. (2005). 전자정보 이용통계 활용 전략. 정보관리학회지, 22(2), 5-21.

3.

최귀숙. (2002). SCI 논문의 참고문헌 분석을 통한 학술지 평가에 관한 연구. 정보관리연구, 33(2), 33-48.

4.

Broadus, Robert N. (1985). The Measurement of Periodicals Use. Serials Review, , 57-61.

5.

Chrzastowski, Tina E. (1991). Journal collection Cost-Effectiveness in an Academic Chemistry Library: Results of a Cost/Use Survey at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Collection Management, 14(1), 85-98.

6.

Deurenberg, Rikie. (1993). Journal deselection in a Medical University Library by Ranking Periodicals based on Multiple factor. Bull Med Libr Asso, 81(3), 316-319.

7.

Hasslow, Rolf. (1995). Deselection of Serials: the Chalmers University of Technology Library Method. Collection Management, 19(3), 151-170.

8.

Hunt, Richard K. (1990). Journal deselection in a Biomedical Research Library: a Mediated Mathematical Approach. Bull Med Libr Asso., 78(1), 45-48.

9.

Ke. Exploring Behavior of E-Journa Users in Science and technology: Transaction log analysis of Elsevier's ScienceDirect On Site in Taiwan.

10.

Mercer, Linda S. (2000). Measuring the User and Value of Electronic Journals and Books.

11.

(2009). http://www.library.ucsb.edu. http://www.library.ucsb.edu/istl/00-winter.

12.

Milne, Dorothy. (1991). A Survey of the Cost-Effectiveness of Serials: A Cost-Per-Use Method and Its Results. Serial Librarian, 19(3), 137-149.

13.

Christopher, Millson-Martula. (1988). Use Studies and Serials Rationalization: A Review. The Serial Librarian, 15(1), 121-136.

14.

Monopoli, Maria. (2002). A User-Oriented Evaluation of Digital Libraries: Case Study the "Electronic Journals" services of the Library and Information Service of the University of Patras, Greece. Aslib Proceedings, 54(2), 103-117.

15.

Scigliano, Marisa. (2000). Serial Use in a Small Academic Library: Determining Cost-Effectiveness. Serial Use in a Small Academic Library, 26(1), 43-52.

16.

Sridhar, M.S. (1988). Is Cost Benefit Analysis Applicable to Journal Use in Special Libraries?. Serials Librarian, 15(1), 137-153.

Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management

e-Submission OA Policy