바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

Effective persuasion message type depending on when people get the results of preventive behavior: Based on construal level theory

Abstract

From this study, effective message type for persuasion is to be revealed(or researched) based on construal level theory, having the key concept on the characteristics of preventive behavior which shows the timing for action and timing for accomplishing result do not match. According to the construal level theory, people have different representation depends on the psychological associations with temporal distances. The receptivity of message is increased when psychological distance and characteristics highlighted in the message are well harmonized. In study 1, it is examined that whether construal level matching with message is more effective or not by letting temporal frame differentiates interpretation level of persuasive message. Specifically, participants show higher preventive vaccination behavioral intentions in the near future rather than the distinct future when the message is concrete. but results were reversed when message is abstract. In study 2, the control of message framing effectiveness which can be done by temporal frame, is examined. The results showed the loss framing message was more effective than the gain framing message in the near future, but the gain framing message was more effective in the distant future. These results imply that effective persuasion messages may vary depending on the temporal context. Also, these results provide practical implications of consumer behavior under the temporal context, but beyond the health behavior domains.

keywords
preventive behavior, construal level theory, distance-congruent claims, message framing

Reference

1.

김재휘, 신진석 (2004). 공익광고 메시지의 프레이밍과 결과 지각이 환경 행동에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 소비자광고, 5(2), 65-86.

2.

김재휘, 이지선 (2009). 자기개념 점화와 메시지 프레이밍이 설득에 미치는 영향. 광고학연구, 20(1), 63-76.

3.

김정현, 이명천, 최현경 (2008). 메시지 유형과 수용자 요인이 자궁경부암 예방 광고효과에 미치는 영향. 광고연구, 겨울, 77-103.

4.

류강석, 박종철, 권성우 (2006), 소비자의 조절초점이 타협대안의 선택에 미치는 영향, 마케팅연구, 21(4), 49-65.

5.

임성준, 윤혜원, 윤용식, 손영우 (2009) 제품 구매 예상 시점과 제품군 분류에 따른 효과적인 광고 메시지: 시기추론이론을 중심으로. 한국심리학회지: 소비자․광고, 10(2), 21-336.

6.

조형오 (2000). 금연 광고 메시지 유형의 효과 분석: 메시지 프레이밍과 메시지 소구 방향의 매개 역할. 광고학연구, 11(1), 133-157.

7.

최경아, 김정혜, 이경순, 오진경, 유선니, 신해림 (2008). 우리나라 성인 여성의 HPV 감염과 HPV 백신 접종에 대한 지식 및 태도 조사, 대한산부인과학회지, 51(6), 617-623.

8.

허종호 (2007).�쿠폰유형 및 조절적 동기가 쿠폰이용의도에 미치는 효과. 광고연구, 74, 167-189.

9.

허종호, 이준환 (2009). 쿠폰유효기간에 따른 쿠폰메시지 전략에 관한 연구, 광고연구, 82, 177-200

10.

Aaker, J. L. & Lee, A. Y. (2001), ‘I’ Seek Pleasures and ‘We’ Avoid Pains: The Role of Self-Regulatory Goals in Information Processing and Persuasion,” Journal of Consumer Research, 28, 33-49.

11.

Aaker, J. L. & Lee, A. Y. (2006), Understanding Regulatory Fit, Journal of Marketing Research, 43, 15-19.

12.

Apanovitch, A. M., McCarthy, D. & Salovey, P. (2003). Using message framing to motivate HIV testing among low-income, ethnic minority women. Health Psychology, 22, 60-7.

13.

Block, L. G. & Keller, P. A. (1995). When to accentuate the negative: The effects of perceived efficacy and message framing on intentions to perform a health-related behavior, Journal of Marketing Research, 32, 192-203.

14.

Boster, F. J., & Mongeau, P. (1984). Fear-arousing persuasive messages. In R. N. Bostrom & B. H. Westley (Eds.), Communication yearbook 8 (pp.330-75), Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

15.

Buunk, B. P., Collins, R. L., Taylor, S. E. & Van Yperen, N. W. & Dakof, G. A. (1990). The affective consequences of social comparison direction has its ups and downs, Journal of Personality Psychology, 59, 1238-1249.

16.

Chandran, S. & Menon, G. (2004). When a day means more than a year: Effects of temporal framing on judgments of health risk, Journal of Consumer Research, 31, 375–89.

17.

Chapman, G. B. (1996). Temporal discounting and utility of health and money, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 771-791.

18.

Chapman, G. B., Brewer, N. T., Coups, E. J., Brownlee, S., Leventhal, H. & Leventhal, E. A. (2001), Value for the future and preventive health behavior. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 7, 235–250.

19.

Chapman, G. B. & Coups, E. J. (1999). Time preferences and preventive health behavior: Acceptance of Influenza vaccine, Medical Decision Making, 19, 307-314.

20.

Detweiler, J. B., Bedell, B. T., Salovey, P., Pronin, E., & Rothman, A. J. (1999). Message framing and sun screen use: Gain-framed messages motivate beach-goers, Health Psychology, 18, 189–96.

21.

Dhar, R., Y. Kim, E. Y. (2007). Seeing the Forest or the Trees: Implications of Construal Level Theory for Consumer Choice, Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17(2), 96–100.

22.

Estle, S. J., Green, L., Myerson, J. & Holt, D. D. (2006). Differential effects of amount on temporal and probability discounting of gains and losses, Memory & Cognition, 34, 914–.928.

23.

Florack, A. & Hartmann, J. (2007). Regulatory Focus and Investment Decisions in Small Groups, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 626-632.

24.

Floyd, D. L., Prentice-Dunn, S. & Rogers, R. W. (2000). A meta-analysis of research on protection motivation theory, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30, 407-429.

25.

Freimuth, V.S., Hammond, S. L., Edgar, T., & Monahan. J. L., (1990). Reaching those at risk: A content analytic study of AIDS PSA's, Communication Research, 17, 775-791.

26.

Gerend.. M. A.& Cullen. M. (2008). Effects of message framing and temporal context on college student drinking behavior, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(4), 1167-1173.

27.

Green, L. & Myerson, J. (2004). A discounting framework for choice with delayed and probabilistic rewards, Psychological Bulletin, 130, 769-792.

28.

Helgeson, V. S., & Taylor, S. E. (1993). Social comparisons and adjustment among cardiac parents, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23, 1171-1195

29.

Higgins, E. T. (1997). Beyond�Pleasure�and Pain, American Psychologist, 52, 1280-1300.

30.

Higgins, E. T. (2006). How regulatory fit creates value, Social psychology and economics (pp. 79-94). New York: Guilford.

31.

Kahneman, D. & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk, Econometrica, 47, 263-292.

32.

Kiene, S. M., Barta, W. D., Zelenski, J. M. & Cothran, D. L. (2005). Why are you bringing up condoms now? The effect of message content on framing effects of condom use messages, Health Psychology, 24(3), 321–326.

33.

Kim, E. Y., Dhar, R., & Novemsky, N. (2007). Consumer receptivity of psychological near and distance product advertising messages. Manuscript in preparation, Yale University.

34.

Kim, Y. J. (2006). The Role of Regulatory Focus in Message Framing in Antismoking Advertisements for Adolescents, Journal of Advertising, 35, 143-151.

35.

LaTour, M. S., Snipes, R. L. & Bliss, S. J. (1996). Don't be afraid to use fear appeals: An experimental study, Journal of Advertising Research 36(2), 59-67.

36.

Lee, A. Y., Keller, P. A. & Sternthal, B. (2010). Value from regulatory construal fit: The persuasive impact of fit between consumer goals and message concreteness, Journal of Consumer Research, 36(5), 735-747.

37.

Liberman, N., Sagristano, M., & Trope, Y. (2002).The effect of temporal distance on level of construal, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 523–535.

38.

Liberman, N. & Trope, Y. (1998). The role of feasibility and desirability considerations in near and distant future decisions: A test of temporal construal theory, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 5-18.

39.

Maheswaran, D. & Meyers-Levy, J. (1990). The influence of message framing and issue involvement, Journal of Marketing Research, 27, 361–67.

40.

Malkoc, S. & Zauberman, G. (2006). Deferring versus expediting consumption: The effect of outcome concreteness on sensitivity to time horizon, Journal of Marketing Research, 43, 618–27.

41.

Meyerowitz, B. E. & Chaikenm S. (1987). The Effect of message framing on breast self-examination attitudes, intentions and behavior, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(3), 500-510.

42.

Perloff, L. S. (1983). Perception of vulnerability to victimization. Journal of Social Issue, 39, 41-61.

43.

Perloff, R. R. (2003). The dynamics of persuasion, Communication and Attitides in the 21st century(2nd ed.), Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 187.

44.

Peterson, C. & de Avila, M. (1995). Optimistic explanatory style and the perception of health problem, Journal of Clinical Psychology, 51, 128-132.

45.

Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1984). The effects of involvement on responses to argument quality and quantity: Central and peripheral routes to persuasion, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 69-.81.

46.

Rippetoe, P. & Rogers, R. W. (1987). Effects of components of protection motivation theory on adaptive and maladaptive coping with a health threat, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 596–604.

47.

Robberson, M. R., and Rogers, R. W. (1988).Beyond fear appeals: Negative and positive persuasive appeals to health and self-esteem, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 18, 277-287.

48.

Rothman, A. J. & Salovey, P. (1997). Shaping perceptions to motivate healthy behavior: The Role of message framing, Psychological Bulletin, 121(1), 3-19.

49.

Schneider, T. R., Salovey, P., Apanovitch, A. M., Pizarro, J., McCarthy, D. & Zullo, J. (2001). The effects of message framing and ethnic targeting on mammography use among low-income women, Health Psychology, 20, 256–66.

50.

Thomas, M., Chandran, S., & Trope, Y. (2006). The effects of temporal distance on purchase construal, Cornell University.

51.

Trope, Y. & Liberman, N. (2000). Temporal construal and time-dependent changes in preference, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 876-89.

52.

Trope, Y. & Liberman, N. (2003). Temporal construal, Psychological Review, 110, 403-421.

53.

Trope, Y., Liberman, N. & Wakslak, C. (2007). Construal Levels and Psychological Distance: Effects on Representation, Prediction, Evaluation, and Behavior, Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17(2), 83-5.

54.

Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice, Science, 211, 453-458.

55.

Vallacher, R. R. & Wegner, D. M. (1987). What do people think they're doing? Action identification and human behavior, Psychological Review, 94, 3‑15.

56.

Witte, K. & Allen, M. (2000). A meta-analysis of fear appeals: Implications for effective public health campaigns, Health Education and Behavior, 27, 591-15.

57.

Zauberman, J. G. L. Jr. (2005). Resource Slack and Discounting of Future Time Versus Money, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134(1), 23–7.

58.

Zhao, G. & Pechmann, C. (2007). The Impact of Regulatory Focus on Adolescents' Response to Antismoking Advertising Campaigns, Journal of Marketing Research, 44, 671-687

logo