바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

목표 표상방식과 대안 처리체계가 장기적 목표 달성에 미치는 효과: 다이어트 목표행동에 대한 고갈효과를 중심으로

The effect of Goal pursuit motivation and Hot-Cool system on long-term goal: focus on depletion effect of diet

초록

본 연구는 꾸준하게 다중목표의 갈등을 조절하는 노력이 요구되는 장기적 목표행동에서, 소비자들이 겪는 자기조절의 한계를 극복할 수 있는 전략을 제시하고자 한다. 특히 최근 많은 사람들에게 공유되는 목표인 ‘다이어트 행동’을 중심으로, 동기가 ‘고갈효과’를 감소시키는 역할을 할 수 있음을 가정하였다. 연구 1에서는 목표 표상방식을 통해 활성화된 동기가 자기조절자원의 소진을 극복할 수 있는지를 검증하였다. 현재 상태와 자신이 바라는 최종 상태와의 불일치에 초점을 맞추는 ‘과정 표상’과, 목표 달성시의 가치에 대해 떠올리는 ‘몰입 표상’을 통제집단과 비교하여, 동기가 고갈효과에 미치는 영향을 확인하였다. 연구 1의 결과에 따르면, ‘몰입 표상’집단은 통제 집단과의 차이가 유의하지 않았으며 고갈효과의 감소 역시 나타나지 않았으나, ‘과정 표상’집단은 다른 집단에 비해 자기통제 의도가 증가하여 고갈효과가 감소되는 것으로 나타나 가설 1이 지지되었다. 이러한 결과를 바탕으로, 연구 2에서는 유혹 대안에 많은 영향을 받는 다이어트 행동에서, 목표 표상을 통해 활성화된 동기가 유지될 수 있는 방법을 ‘대안 처리체계’를 통해 확인하였다. 2(목표 표상방식: 과정 표상 / 몰입표상) x 2(대안 처리체계: 감정적 체계 / 인지적 체계)의 연구 설계를 통해, 자기통제 행동 및 의도를 측정하였다. 실험 결과에 따르면, 다이어트라는 목표를 추구하며 경험하게 되는 자기조절의 한계를 극복하기 위해서는, 목표를 ‘과정’으로 표상할 때는 유혹 대안을 ‘인지적 체계’로 처리하고, ‘몰입’하여 표상할 때는 ‘감정적 체계’로 처리하는 것이 자기통제 행동을 유지하는데 효과적일 수 있음을 제안 할 수 있다. 이러한 관점에서 본 연구는 장기적 목표를 달성하는 과정에서 발생하는 ‘고갈효과’를 감소시키는 방법으로, 심리적인 요인인 동기의 효과를 확인하였다는 점, 그리고 이에서 더 나아가 ‘목표 표상방식’과 ‘대안 처리체계’의 조절을 통하여 고갈현상을 억제하고 다이어트 목표를 이룰 수 있는 실질적인 방법을 제안하였다는 점에서 의의가 있다.

keywords
depletion effect, goal progress, goal commitment, hot-cool system, diet, 고갈효과, 장기적 목표, 목표 표상방식, 처리체계, 다이어트 행동

Abstract

Individuals who pursuit lont-term goal, especially diet, experience self-regulation resource depletion. This study is suggest that depleted regulation resource may be compensated by motivation. Study 1 is found that motivation activated by goal progress can block depletion effect, but goal commitment can not decrease self-regulation depletion. This result suggest that reduced self-control on long-term goal may influenced by motivation from goal progress. Study 2 addressed questions about mechanism of goal shielding when regulation resource depleted. Therefore, this study designed 2(goal progress/goal commitment) x 2(hot system/cool system) and all participant experience self-regulation depletion. We found that Hot-cool system keep motivation of focal goal activated by goal progress and goal commitment. This findings are suggest that Dieters who are depleted regulation resource may be compensated by goal progress activate motivation and prevented goal shielding by Hot-cool system.

keywords
depletion effect, goal progress, goal commitment, hot-cool system, diet

참고문헌

1.

Agrawal, N., & Wan, E. W. (2009). Regulating Risk or Risking Regulation? Construal Levels and Depletion Effects in the Processing of Health Messages. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(3), 448-462.

2.

Baumeister, R. F. (2002). Ego Depletion and Self-Control Failure: An Energy Model of the Self's Executive Funcion. Self and Identity, 1, 129-136.

3.

Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Muraven, M., & Tice, D., M. (1998). Ego depletion: Is the active self a limited resource? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(5), 1252 -1265.

4.

Baumeister, R. F., & Heatherton, T. F. (1996). Self-Regulation Fallure: An Overview. Psychological Inquiry, 7(1), 1-15.

5.

Baumeister, R. F., & Vohs, K. D. (2007). Self-Regulation, Ego Depletion, and Motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Compass, 1(1), 115-128.

6.

Baumeister, R. F., Vohs, K. D., & Tice, D. M. (2007), The Strength Model of Self-Control. Psychological Science, 16(6), 351-355.

7.

Carlson, K. A., Margaret G. Meloy, M. G., & Miller. E. G. (2013). Goal Reversion in Consumer Choice. Journal of Consumer Research, in press.

8.

Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1990). Origins and Functions of Positive and Negative Affect: A Control-Process View. Psychological Review, 97(1), 19-35.

9.

Chartrand, T. L., Huber, J., Shiv, B., & Tanner, R. J. (2008). Nonconscious Goals and Consumer Choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 35(2), 189-201.

10.

Cialdini, R. B., Trost, M. R., & Newsom, J. T. (1995). Preference For Consistency: The Development of A Valid Measure And The Discovery of Surprising Behavioral implications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(2), 318-328.

11.

Clarkson, J. J., Hirt, E. R., Jia, L., & Alexander, M. B. (2010). When perception is more than reality: The effects of perceived versus actual resource depletion on self-regulatory behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 29-46.

12.

Critcher, C. R., & Ferguson, M. J. (2011). Affect in the abstract: Abstract Mindsets Promote Sensitivity to Affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 1185-1191.

13.

Dhar, R., & Kim, E. Y. (2007). Seeing the Forest or the Trees: Implications of Construal Level Theory for Consumer Choice. Journal Of Consumer Psychology, 17(2), 96-100.

14.

Eyal, T., Fishbach, A., & Labroo, A. (2009). Effects of Feedback on Goal Pursuit. Unpublished Manuscript, University of Chicago.

15.

Finkelstein, S. R. & Fishbach, A. (2010). When Healthy Food Makes You Hungry. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(3), 357-367.

16.

Fishbach, A., & Dhar, R. (2005). Goals as Excuses or Guides: The Liberating Effect of Perceived Goal Progress on Choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 32, 370-377.

17.

Fishbach, A., & Dhar, R. (2006). Dynamics of goal-based choice: Toward an understanding on how goals commit versus liberate choice. In C. P. Haugtvedt, P. M. Herr, & F. R. Kardes (Eds.), Handbook of Consumer Psychology (forthcoming). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Press.

18.

Fishbach, A., Dhar, R., & Zhang, Y. (2006). Subgoals as Substitutes of Complements: The Role of Goal Accessibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(2), 232-242.

19.

Fishbach, A., & Labroo, A. A. (2007). Be Better or Be Merry: How Mood Affects Self-control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(2), 158-173.

20.

Friedman, R. S., & Förster, J. (2010). Implicit affective cues and attentional tuning: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 136(5), 875, 893.

21.

Gollwitzer, P. M. (1999). Implementaion Intentions: Strong Effects of Simple Plans. American Psychologist, 54(7), 493-503.

22.

Hagger, M. S., Wood, C. W., Stiff, C., & Chatzisarantic, N. L. D. (2010). Self- Regulation and Self-Control In Exercise: The Strength-Energy Model. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 3, 62-86.

23.

Heatherton, T. F., & Baumeister, R. F. (1996). Self-regulation Failure: Past, Present, and Future. Psychological Inquiry, 7, 90-98.

24.

Heatherton, T. F., & Vohs, K. D. (1998). Why is It So Difficult to Inhibit Behavior? Psychological Inquiry, 9, 212-215.

25.

Huang, S., Zhang, Y., & Broniarczyk, S. M. (2012). So Near and Yet So Far: The Mental Representation of Goal Progress. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(2), 225-241.

26.

Job, V., Dweck, C. S., & Walton, G. M. (2010). Ego Depletion - Is It All in Your Head? Implicit Theories About Willpower Affect Self-Regulation. Psychological Science, 21(11), 1686-1693.

27.

Koo, M. J., & Fishbach. A. (2010). A Silver Lining of Standing in Line: Queuing Increases Value of Products. Journal of Marketing Research, 47(4), 713-724.

28.

Kruglanski, A. W., Shah, J. Y., Fishbach. A., Friedman. R., Woo, Y. C., & David, S. K. (2002). A Theory of Goal Systems. Experimental Social Psychology, 34, 331-378.

29.

Leith, K. P., & Baumeister, R. F. (1996). Why Do Bad Moods Increase Self-Defeating Behavior? Emotion, Risk taking, and Self-Regulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 1250-1267.

30.

Lewin, K. (1935). A dynamic theory of personality: Selected papers (D. E. Adams & K. E. Zener, Trans.). New York: McGraw Hill.

31.

Lewin, K. (1951). Field theory in social science. New York: Harper.

32.

Loewenstein, G. (1996). Out of Control: Visceral Influences on Behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 65, 272-292.

33.

Markman, A. B., & Brendl, C. M. (2005). in Applying Social Cognition to Consumer- Focused Strategy. Goals, Policies, Preferences, and Actions. ed. Frank R. Kardes, Paul M. Herr, and Jacques Nantel, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 183-200.

34.

Metcalfe, J., & Mischel, W. (1999). A Hot/ Cool-System Analysis of Delay of Gratification: Dynamics of Willpower. Psychological Review, 106, 3-19.

35.

Miller, N. E. (1944). Experimental studies in conflict. In J. M. Hunt (Ed.). Personality and the behavioral disorders, 1, 431-465. New York: Roland Press.

36.

Muraven, M., & Baumeister, R. F. (2000). Self-Regulation and Depletion of Limited Resources: Does Self-Control Resemble a Muscle? Psychological Bulletin, 126(2), 247-259.

37.

Muraven, M., Shmueli, D., & Burkley, E. (2006). Conserving Self-Control Strength. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 524-537.

38.

Muraven, M., & Slessareva, E. (2003). Mechanisms of Self-Control Failure: Motivation and Limited Resources. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 894-906.

39.

Muraven, M., Tice, D. M., & Baumeister, R. F. (1998). Self-control as a Limited Resource. Regulatory Depletion Patterns. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 774-789.

40.

Myrseth, S. E., & Fishbach, A. (2009). Self-Control: A Function of Knowing When and How to Exercise Restraint. Psychological Science, 18(4), 247-253.

41.

Schmeichel, B. J., & Vohs, K. (2009). Self-affirmation and self-control: Affirming core values counteracts ego depletion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(4), 770 -782.

42.

Scott, M. L., Lowlis, S. M., Mandel, N., & Andrea, C. M. (2008). Package Size on the Consumption Behavior of Restrained and Unrestained Eaters. Journal of Consumer Research, 35(3), 391-405.

43.

Scheier, M., F., & Carver, C. S. (1998). A model of behavioral self-regulation regulation: Translating intention into action. Advances in experimental social psychology, 21, 303-346.

44.

Shah, J. Y., Friedman, R., & Kruglanski, A. W., (2002). Forgetting all else: On the antecedents and consequences of goal shielding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol 83(6), 1261-1280.

45.

Shah, J. Y., & Kruglanski, A. W. (2002). Priming against your will: How accessible alternatives affect goal pursuit. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38(4), 368-383.

46.

Shah, J. Y., & Kruglanski, A. W. (2003). When Opportunity Knocks: Bottom-up Priming of Goals by Means and its Effects on Self Regulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(6), 1109-1122.

47.

Tangney, J. P., Baumeister, R. F., & Boone, A. (2004). High Self-Control Predicts Good Adjustment, Less Pathology, Better Grades, and Interpersonal Success. Journal of Personality, 72, 271-324.

48.

Tice, D. M., Bratslavsky, E., & Baumeister, R. F. (2001). Emotional distress regulation takes precedence over impulse control: If you feel bad, do it! Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(1), 53-67.

49.

Trope, Y., & Fishbach, A. (2000). Counteractive Self-Control in Overcoming Temptation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(4), 493-506.

50.

Vohs, K. D., & Heatherton, T. F. (2000). Self-Regulatory Failure: A Resource-Depletion Approach. Psychological Science, 11(3), 249-254.

51.

Wan, E. W., & Sternthal, B. (2008). Regulating The Effects of Depletion Through Monitoring. The Society for Personality and Social Psychology, 34(1), 32-46.

52.

Wrosch, C., Scheier, M. F., Carver, C. S., & Rchulz, R. (2003). The Importance of Goal Disengagement in Adaptive Self-Regulation: When Giving Up is Beneficial. Self and Identity, 2(1), 1-20.

53.

Zhang, Y., Fishbach, A., & Dhar, R. (2007). When Thinking Beats Doing: The Role of Optimistic Expectations in Goal-Based Choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 34, 567-578.

logo