바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

브랜드의 시장지위에 따른 직접비교광고와 간접비교광고의 소비자반응

The Consumer Responses of Direct Comparative and Indirect Comparative Advertising Based on the Brand's Market Position

초록

본 연구의 목적은 브랜드의 시장지위와 비교광고유형에 대한 소비자반응을 살펴보는 것이다. 특히, 브랜드의 시장지위(시장도전브랜드 vs. 시장추종브랜드)에 따라 비교광고유형(직접비교광고 vs. 간접비교광고)에 대한 소비자반응 즉 브랜드태도와 구매의도가 차이가 있는지를 살펴보았다. 연구결과, 브랜드의 시장지위도 비교광고유형도 브랜드태도나 구매의도에 대한 주효과는 없는 것으로 나타났지만, 브랜드 시장지위와 비교광고유형 간에 브랜드태도와 구매의도 모두 상호작용효과가 유의하게 나타났다. 시장도전브랜드의 경우 간접비교광고에 의해서, 시장추종브랜드는 직접비교광고에 의해서 더욱 높은 광고 효과를 가져왔다. 이러한 연구결과를 토대로 비교광고와 관련된 실무적 시사점과 연구 한계점, 향후 연구의 방향성에 대해 논의하였다.

keywords
direct comparative advertising, indirect comparative advertising, market challenging brand, market following brand, brand attitude, purchase intention, 직접비교광고, 간접비교광고, 시장도전브랜드, 시장추종브랜드, 브랜드태도, 구매의도

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine the consumer responses of the brand's market position and the types of comparative advertising. Specifically, This study examined if there is difference in consumer responses of the types of comparative advertising (direct comparative advertising vs. indirect comparative advertising) by brand's market position(market challenging brand vs. market following brand). The result revealed that the main effects of brand's market position and comparative advertising types were not significant in both brand attitude and purchase intention. But, importantly, there was an interaction effect between brand's market position and the types of comparative advertising on both brand attitudes and purchase intention. Specifically, market challenging brand showed significant higher brand attitude and purchase intention in indirect comparative ads than direct comparative ads. On the other hand, Market following brand showed significant higher brand attitude and purchase intention in direct comparative ads than indirect comparative ads. Based on the results, practical implications are discussed, followed by limitations of the study.

keywords
direct comparative advertising, indirect comparative advertising, market challenging brand, market following brand, brand attitude, purchase intention

참고문헌

1.

김상학 (2004). 소수자 집단에 대한 태도와 사회적 거리감. 사회연구, 1(1), 169-206.

2.

나준희 (2013). 비교광고, 어떻게 실행해야 하는가?: Johnson (1984) 연구결과의 이론적 재해석. 광고학연구, 24(8), 229-255.

3.

송정미 (2012). 도입기시장에서 정보제공형 광고유형과 기업의 시장지위에 따른 소비자반응, 광고학연구, 23(2), 105-123.

4.

유홍국 (2001). 국내 비교광고의 크리에이티브 유형별 개선방안 연구, 홍익대학교 광고홍보대학원 석사학위논문.

5.

윤태일 (2000). 광고태도에 미치는 선험적 상표 태도의 영향에 있어서 정서의 매개 역할과 중재역할, 광고학연구, 13(2), 27-46.

6.

정윤경 (1997). 시장포지션과 비교광고 유형에 따른 광고 효과에 관한 연구. 서강대학교 경영대학원 석사학위논문.

7.

최자영, 김용범 (2012). 소셜네트워크(SNS)에서 제품추천의 사회적 거리에 따른 설득력과 제품평가 분석, 한국심리학회지: 소비자․광고, 13(4), 513-539.

8.

최호규 (1995). 비교광고를 통한 태도변화의 구조적 관계에 관한 연구, 광고연구, 28, 171-199.

9.

하영원, 안희경 (2001). 연구논문: 기업브랜드 스테레오타입에 일치하지 않는 정보가 스테레오타입의 변화에 미치는 영향. 마케팅연구, 16(1), 109-134.

10.

하환호, 이영일 (2005). 시장지위를 고려한 광고 제시순서와 소구유형이 브랜드 평가에 미치는 영향. 광고학연구, 16(4), 155-181.

11.

홍성태, 강명선 (1993). 비교광고의 효과에 관한 연구, 광고연구, 18(3), 123-140.

12.

Aaker, D. A., Batra, R., & Myers, J. G. (1992). Advertising Management, 4th ed., Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

13.

Bogardus, E. S. (1925). Social distance and its origins. Journal of Applied Sociology, 9(2), 216-226.

14.

Campbell, M. C., & Goodstein, R. C. (2011). The moderating effect of perceived risk on consumers' evaluation of product incongruity: preference for the norm, Journal of Consumer Research, 28, 439-449.

15.

Carpenter, G. S., & Nakamoto, K. (1989). Consumer preference formation and pioneering advantage. Journal of Marketing Research, 285-298.

16.

Dröge, C. (1989). Shaping the route to attitude change: Central versus peripheral processing through comparative versus noncomparative advertising. Journal of Marketing Research.

17.

Gorn, G. J., & Weinberg, C. B. (1984). The impact of comparative advertising on perception and attitude: Some positive findings, Journal of Consumer Research, 11(2), 719-727.

18.

Hellofs, L. L., & Jacobson, R. (1999). Market share and customers' perceptions of quality: when can firms grow their way to higher versus lower quality?. Journal of Marketing, 16-25.

19.

Herr, P. M., Farquhar, P. H., & Fazio, R. H. (1993). Using dominance measures to evaluate brand extensions. Marketing Science Institute.

20.

Jackson, D. W., Brown, S. W., & Harmon, R. R. (1979). Comparative magazine advertisements. Journal of Advertising research, 19(6), 21-26.

21.

Jain, S. C., & Hackleman, E. C. (1978). How effective is comparison advertising for stimulating brand recall?. Journal of Advertising, 7(3), 20-25.

22.

Johnson M. (1984). Consumer choice strategies for comparing noncomparable alternatives. Journal of Consumer Research, 11(December), 741-753.

23.

Joseph, R. P., John G., DJ N., & Park, K. W. (2004). Brand congruity and comparative advertising: When and Why comparative advertisiements lead to greater elaboration, Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14(1&2), 115-123.

24.

Kadushin, C. (1962). Social distance between client and professional. American Journal of Sociology, 517-531.

25.

Kalro, A. D., Sivakumaran, B., & Marathe, R. R. (2013). Direct or indirect comparative ads: The moderating role of information processing modes. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 12(2), 133-147.

26.

Keller, K. L. (2003), Brand synthesis: the multi-dimentionality of brand knowledge, Journal of Consumer Research, March, 595-600.

27.

Kim, K., Zhang, M., & Li, X. (2008). Effects of temporal and social distance on consumer evaluations. Journal of Consumer Research, 35(4), 706-713.

28.

Lamb Jr, C. W., Pride, W. M., & Pletcher, B. A. (1978). A taxonomy for comparative advertising research. Journal of advertising, 7(1), 43-47.

29.

Laumann, E. O. (1965). Subjective social distance and urban occupational stratification. American Journal of Sociology, 26-36.

30.

Liberman, N., & Trope, Y. (1998). The role of feasibility and desirability considerations in near and distant future decisions: A test of temporal construal theory. Journal of personality and social psychology, 75(1), 5.

31.

Liviatan, I., Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2008). Interpersonal similarity as a social distance dimension: Implications for perception of others’ actions. Journal of experimental social psychology, 44(5), 1256-1269.

32.

Miniard, P. l W., Michael J. B., Randall L. R., & Kenneth C. M. (2006). A further assessment of indirect comparative advertising claims of superiority over all competitors,” Journal of Advertising, 35(Winter), 53-64.

33.

Muehling, D. D., Stoltman, J. J., & Grossbart, S. (1990). The impact of comparative advertising on levels of message involvement. Journal of Advertising, 19(4), 41-50

34.

O'Connor, P. J. (1986). The information value of comparative advertising mediating purchase influence. In Proceedings of the American Marketing Association Educators' Conference. Chicago: American Marketing Association.

35.

Pechmann, C., & Stewart, D. W. (1990). The effects of comparative advertising on attention, memory, and purchase intentions. Journal of Consumer Research, 180-191.

36.

Prasad, V. K. (1976). Communications-effectiveness of comparative advertising: a laboratory analysis. Journal of Marketing Research, 128-137.

37.

Priester, J. R., Godek, J., Nayakankuppum, D. J., & Park, K. (2004). Brand congruity and comparative advertising: When and why comparative advertisements lead to greater elaboration. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14(1), 115-123.

38.

Shimada C. (1997). MBA マ―ケテイング 戦略. Globis Corp.

39.

Shimp, T. A., & Dyer, D. C. (1978). The effects of comparative advertising mediated by market position of sponsoring brand, Journal of Advertising, 7, 13-19.

40.

Smith, P. K., & Trope Y. (2006). You focus on the forest when you're in charge of the trees: Power priming and abstract information processing, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(4), 578-596.

41.

Stafford, M. R., Stafford, T. F., & Chowdhury, J. (1996). Predispositions toward green issues: The potential efficacy of advertising appeals, Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising, 18(1), 67-79.

42.

Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2003). Temporal construal. Psychological review, 110(3), 403.

43.

Wakslak, C. J., Trope, Y., Liberman, N., & Alony, R. (2006). Seeing the forest when entry is unlikely: probability and the mental representation of events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135(4), 641.

44.

Wilkie, W. L., & Farris, P. W. (1975). Comparison advertising: Problems and potential. The Journal of Marketing, 39(October)

45.

Yagci, M. I., Biswas, A., & Dutta, S. (2009). Effects of comparative advertising format on consumer responses: The moderating effects of brand image and attribute relevance, Journal of Business Research, 62, 768-774.

46.

Zhao, M., & Xie, J. (2011). Effects of social and temporal distance on consumers' responses to peer recommendations. Journal of Marketing Research, 48(3), 486-496.

logo