.png){kind=logo}
ISSN : 1229-8778
The objective of this study is to investigate the effect of stylistic information about an art image in package design on consumers’ aesthetic reponses. Stylistic information about art image in a package design is defined as verbal information provided for consumers to better understand the art image embedded in a package. This study also examines the moderating effect of product type and consumers’ centrality of visual product aesthetics(CVPA). Lastly, the mediating effect of conceptual fluency in the relationship between stylistic art image information and consumers’ aesthetic response is explored. The sample consisted of 132 university students and the results demonstrate that stylistic art image information positively influence consumers’ aesthetic responses toward package design through conceptual fluency. Further, it is found that there is significant three way interaction among product type, CVPA, and stylistic information about art image on consumers’ aesthetic reponses. Specifically, there is no significant interaction effect between product type and CVPA when stylistic information about art image is provided. However, consumers with higher CVPA exhibit more positive aesthetic response for hedonic product when stylistic information is not provided. Meanwhile, for consumes with lower CVPA, an aesthetic response is more positive for an utilitarian product when stylistic information is not provided. These findings provide theoretical and managerial implications for art infused package design and its communication strategies.
김지애, 김형준 (2015). 아트 친숙성과 아트-제품 적합성이 소비자 반응에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구: 소비자의 심미적 성향의 조절효과를 중심으로. 마케팅논집, 23(2), 67-83.
김현경, 김형준 (2014). 아트 콜라보레이션이 제품 평가에 미치는 영향에 대한 연구: 시각제품에 대한 심미적 성향(CVPA)의 조절역할. 상품학연구, 32, 31-40.
성영신 (2014). 제품의 명화차용효과 (art infusion effect). 한국심리학회지: 소비자․광고, 15(4), 601-629.
이지은, 한여훈 (2010). 제품의 아트 주입이 소비자 평가에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 소비자· 광고, 11(4), 797-821.
이지은, 한여훈 (2011). 아트 주입 유무가 럭셔리 지각에 미치는 영향: 제품 유형과 브랜드 컨셉 유형을 중심으로. 광고학연구, 22(5), 69-97.
전인수, 엄지윤 (2014). 아트인퓨전이 패키지와 제품에 대한 소비자 평가에 미치는 영향. 소비자학연구, 25(1), 87-113.
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173.
Belke, B., Leder, H., Strobach, T., & Carbon, C. C. (2010). Cognitive fluency: High-level processing dynamics in art appreciation. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 4(4), 214-222.
Bloch, P. H., Brunel, F. F., & Arnold, T. J. (2003). Individual differences in the centrality of visual product aesthetics: Concept and measurement. Journal of Consumer Research, 29(4), 551-565.
Borja de Mozota, B. B. (2003). Design management: using design to build brand value and corporate innovation. Skyhorse Publishing Inc.
Chaudhuri, A., & Holbrook, M. B. (2001). The chain of effects from brand trust and brand affect to brand performance: the role of brand loyalty. Journal of Marketing, 65(2), 81-93.
Cupchik, G. C., Shereck, L., & Spiegel, S. (1994). The effects of textual information on artistic communication. Visual Arts Research, 62-78.
Dhar, R., & Wertenbroch, K. (2000). Consumer choice between hedonic and utilitarian goods. Journal of Marketing Research, 37(1), 60-71.
Dodds, W. B., Monroe, K. B., & Grewal, D. (1991). Effects of price, brand, and store information on buyers' product evaluations. Journal of Marketing Research, 307-319.
Hagtvedt, H., & Patrick, V. M. (2008). Art infusion: The influence of visual art on the perception and evaluation of consumer products. Journal of Marketing Research, 45(3), 379-389.
Hirschman, E. C. (1986). The effect of verbal and pictorial advertising stimuli on aesthetic, utilitarian and familiarity perceptions. Journal of Advertising, 15(2), 27-34.
Orth, U. R., Campana, D., & Malkewitz, K. (2010). Formation of consumer price expectation based on package design: attractive and quality routes. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 18(1), 23-40.
Leder, H., Belke, B., Oeberst, A., & Augustin, D. (2004). A model of aesthetic appreciation and aesthetic judgments. British Journal of Psychology, 95(4), 489-508.
Leder, H., Carbon, C. C., & Ripsas, A. L. (2006). Entitling art: Influence of title information on understanding and appreciation of paintings. Acta Psychologica, 121(2), 176-198.
Lee, A. Y., & Labroo, A. A. (2004). The effect of conceptual and perceptual fluency on brand evaluation. Journal of Marketing Research, 41(2), 151-165.
Lee, J., Kim, J., & Yu, J. (2015). Effects of congruence of product, visual image, and consumer self-image on art infusion advertising. Social Behavior and Personality, 43(10), 1725-1740.
Maclnnis, D. J., & Jaworski, B. J. (1989). Information processing from advertisements: Toward an integrative framework. The Journal of Marketing, 1-23.
Millis, K. (2001). Making meaning brings pleasure: the influence of titles on aesthetic experiences. Emotion, 1(3), 320.
Phillips, B. J. (2000). The impact of verbal anchoring on consumer response to image ads. Journal of Advertising, 29(1), 15-24.
Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879-891.
Reber, R., Schwarz, N., & Winkielman, P. (2004). Processing fluency and aesthetic pleasure: Is beauty in the perceiver's processing experience?. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8(4), 364-382.
Russell, P. A. (2003). Effort after meaning and the hedonic value of paintings. British Journal of Psychology, 94(1), 99-110.
Shapiro, S. (1999). When an ad's influence is beyond our conscious control: Perceptual and conceptual fluency effects caused by incidental ad exposure. Journal of Consumer Research, 26(1), 16-36.
Schnurr, B., & Stokburger‐Sauer, N. E. (2016). The effect of stylistic product information on consumers’ aesthetic responses. Psychology & Marketing, 33(3), 165-176.
Shen, H., Jiang, Y., & Adaval, R. (2010). Contrast and assimilation effects of processing fluency. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(5), 876-889.
Spangenberg, E. R., Voss, K. E., & Crowley, A. E. (1997). Measuring the hedonic and utilitarian dimensions of attitude: a generally applicable scale. Advances in Consumer Research, 24(1).
Till, B. D., & Busler, M. (2000). The match-up hypothesis: Physical attractiveness, expertise, and the role of fit on brand attitude, purchase intent and brand beliefs. Journal of Advertising, 29(3), 1-13.
Rompay, T. J., & Veltkamp, M. (2014). Product packaging metaphors: Effects of ambiguity and explanatory information on consumer appreciation and brand perception. Psychology & Marketing, 31(6), 404-415.
Van Rompay, T. J., De Vries, P. W., & Van Venrooij, X. G. (2010). More than words: on the importance of picture-text congruence in the online environment. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 24(1), 22-30.
Whittlesea, B. W. (1993). Illusions of familiarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19(6), 1235.