바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

The Effect of Visual Product Depiction in Advertisement and Dietary Restraint on Consumer Eating Behavior

Abstract

Previous research demonstrated that visual product depictions within advertisements facilitate mental simulation that evokes motor responses. Visually depicting a product that facilitates more (vs. less) embodied mental simulation results in heightened purchase intentions. This research suggests that the mental simulation effect is moderated by the level of dietary restraint. We test the proposed effect in two laboratory studies using vice product(study 1) and virtue product(study 2). In study 1 using cheese burger ad, we investigated the interaction effect between the visual depiction and the level of dietary restraint on eating behavior. As a results, restraint eater more eat the burger when visual product depiction is presented in advertising than without. On the other hand, unrestrant eater do not differ according to the visual depiction condition. In study 2 using salad ad, we found different results with study 1. Unrestraint eater more eat the burger when visual product depiction is presented in advertising than without and restrant eater do not differ according to the visual depiction condition. Results also show that the observed effect is mediated by the mental simulation. We can draw several theoretical and practical contributions. Theoretically, this research contributes to the visual depiction literature by providing novel evidence for moderating effect of dietary restraint on relation between visual depiction and eating behavior. Furthermore, this research offer practitioners with important insights into the effective marketing communication.

keywords
visual product depiction, level of dietary restraint, mental simulation, eating behavior, vice product, virtue product

Reference

1.

송시연, 박종원 (2009). 자아조절자원(self regulatory resource)과 과제유형(task type)이 선한 제품(virtue products)과 악한 제품(vice products) 간 의사결정에 미치는 효과, 소비자학연구, 20(4), 1-25.

2.

안진아, 박종철, 정형식 (2014). 패키지의 건강이미지와 소비자의 섭식절제 수준이 소비자 반응에 미치는 영향, 마케팅연구, 29(4), 69-93.

3.

Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator? mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173.

4.

Chao, L. L., & Martin, A. (2000). Representation of manipulable man-made objects in the dorsal stream. Neuroimage, 12(4), 478-484.

5.

Coelho, J. S., Jansen, A., Roefs, A., & Nederkoorn, C. (2009). Eating behavior in response to food-cue exposure: examining the cue-reactivity and counteractive-control models. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 23(1), 131.

6.

Coelho, J. S., Polivy, J., Herman, C. P., & Pliner, P. (2008). Effects of food-cue exposure on dieting-related goals: A limitation to counteractive-control theory. Appetite, 51(2), 347-349.

7.

Dahl, D. W., Argo, J. J., & Morales, A. C. (2012). Social information in the retail environment: The importance of consumption alignment, referent identity, and self-esteem. Journal of Consumer Research, 38(5), 860-871.

8.

Elder, R. S., & Krishna, A. (2012). The “visual depiction effect” in advertising: Facilitating embodied mental simulation through product orientation. Journal of Consumer Research, 38(6), 988-1003.

9.

Fedoroff, I. D., Polivy, J., & Herman, C. P. (1997). The effect of pre-exposure to food cues on the eating behavior of restrained and unrestrained eaters. Appetite, 28(1), 33-47.

10.

Gallese, Vittorio (2003). A neuroscientific grasp of concepts: From control to representation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences 358(1435), 1231-1240.

11.

Gallese, Vittorio (2005). Embodied simulation: From neurons to phenomenal experience. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 4(1), 23-48.

12.

Heatherton, T. F., Herman, C. P., Polivy, J., King, G. A., & McGree, S. T. (1988). The (mis) measurement of restraint: an analysis of conceptual and psychometric issues. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 97(1), 19.

13.

Herman, C. P., & Polivy, J. (1980). Restrained eating. In A. J. Stunkard (Ed.), Obesity (pp. 208-225). Philadelphia, PA: Saunders.

14.

Klajner, F., Herman, C. P., Polivy, J., & Chhabra, R. (1981). Human obesity, dieting, and anticipatory salivation to food. Physiology & Behavior, 27(2), 195-198.

15.

Larson-Meyer, D. E., Heilbronn, L. K., Redman, L. M., Newcomer, B. R., Frisard, M. I., Anton, S., & Ravussin, E. (2006). Effect of calorie restriction with or without exercise on insulin sensitivity, β-cell function, fat cell size, and ectopic lipid in overweight subjects. Diabetes Care, 29(6), 1337-1344.

16.

McFerran, B., Dahl, D. W., Fitzsimons, G. J., & Morales, A. C. (2010). I’ll have what she’s having: Effects of social influence and body type on the food choices of others. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(6), 915-929.

17.

Scott, M. L., Nowlis, S. M., Mandel, N., & Morales, A. C. (2008). The effects of reduced food size and package size on the consumption behavior of restrained and unrestrained eaters. Journal of Consumer Research, 35(3), 391-405.

18.

Taylor, S. E., & Schneider, S. K. (1989). Coping and the simulation of events. Social Cognition, 7(2), 174-194.

19.

Taylor, S. E., Pham, L. B., Rivkin, I. D., & Armor, D. A. (1998). Harnessing the imagination: mental simulation, self-regulation, and coping. American psychologist, 53(4), 429.

20.

Vohs, K. D., & Faber, R. J. (2007). Spent resources: Self-regulatory resource availability affects impulse buying. Journal of Consumer Research, 33(4), 537-547.

21.

Wertenbroch, K. (1998), Consumption self- control by rationing purchase quantities of virtue and vice, Marketing Science, 17, 317–337.

logo