.png){kind=logo}
ISSN : 1229-8778
The aim of this study is to validate the Korean version of the Decision Making Style Inventory(DMI). The DMI is a 45-item, self-report measure, composed of three subscales, designed to measure an individual’s propensity towards three distinct decision making styles: analytical, intuitive, and regret-based. With a sample of 808 participants, factor analyses confirm that the K-DMI measures three separate latent constructs. Positive and negative correlations between K-DMI scale scores and theoretically relevant scales’ score provide evidence for construct validity of the K-DMI. Furthermore, results show K-DMI scale relates to the use of specific decision making strategies: compensatory decision rules or non-compensatory decision rules. The results of this study indicate that the K-DMI provides reliabld and valid measurements of the degree to which individuals employ analytical, intuitive, and regret-based decision making styles.
김은주, 김정일, 남승규, 노길광 (2011). 일반의사결정유형척도의 타당화, 한국심리학회지: 소비자․광고, 12(4), 751-770.
김청택 (2016). 특집논문: 구조방정식모형의 문제점과 해결 방안; 탐색적 요인분석의 오, 남용 문제와 교정. 조사연구, 17(1), 1-29.
윤성욱, 신성연 (2012). 응원팀의 시합 여부와 경기의 즐거움이 광고회상에 미치는 영향과 인지욕구의 조절효과. 경영학연구, 41(5), 1057-1077.
전중옥, 이금, 박현희 (2013). 희소성 메시지 유형과 메시지 프레이밍에 따른 온라인 광고의 충동구매 효과. 한국심리학회지: 소비자․광고, 14(4), 549-574.
최지은, 박종철 (2013). 판촉의 종류와 제시형태가 소비자 반응에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 소비자․광고, 14(3), 385-408.
Ares, G., Mawad, F., Gimenez, A., & Maiche, A. (2014). Influence of rational and intuitive thinking styles on food choice: Preliminary evidence from an eye-tracking study with yogurt labels. Food Quality and Preferences, 31, 28-37.
Arroba, T. (1977). Styles of decision-making and their use: An empirical study. British Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 5, 149-158.
Ayal, S., Rusou, Z., Zakay, D., & Hochman, G. (2015). Determinants of judgment and decision making quality: the interplay between information processing style and situational factors. Front in Psychology, 6, 1-10.
Barrett, L. F., Tugade, M. M., & Engle, R. W. (2004). Individual differences in working memory capacity and dual-process theories of the mind. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 553-573.
Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588-606.
Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238-246.
Bettman, J. R., & Park, C. W. (1980). Effects of prior knowledge and experience and phase of the choice process on consumer decision processes: A protocol analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 7, 234-248.
Browne, M. W., Cudeck, R., Tateneni, K., & Mels, G. (2004). CEFA: Comprehensive Exploratory Factor Analysis, Version 2.00 [Computer software and manual].
Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1992). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociological Methods and Research, 21, 230-258.
Bruine de Bruin, W., Parker, A. M., & Fischhoff, B. (2007). Individual differences in adult decision making competence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 938-956.
Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., Kao, C. F., & Rodriguez, R. (1986). Central and peripheral routes to persuasion: An individual difference perspective. Journal of personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1032-1043.
Cho, H. (2013). The moderating effect of need for cognition on the informational role of accessibility experiences. 한국심리학회지: 소비자․광고, 14(4), 705-725.
Conteh, N. (2009). The hypothesis testing of decision making styles in the decision making process. Journal of Technology Research, 1, 1-17.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Academic Press.
Conteh, N. (2009). The hypothesis testing of decision making styles in the decision making process. Journal of Technology Research, 1, 1-17.
Epstein, S., Pacini, R., Denes-Raj, V., & Heier, H. (1996). Individual differences in intuitive-experienial and analytic-rational thinking styles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 390-405.
Evans, J. St. B. T. (2008). Dual-processing accounts of reasning, judgment and social cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 255-278.
Harren, B. A. (1979). A model of career decision making for college students. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 14, 119-133.
Inman, J. J., & Zeelenberg, M. Regret in repeat purchase versus switching decisions: The attenuating role of decision justifiability. Journal of Consumer Research, 29. 116-128.
Johnson, R. H. (1978). Individual styles of decision making: A theoretical model for counseling. Personnel and Guidance Journal, 56, 530-536.
Kahneman, D., & Frederick, S. (2002). Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment. Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment.
Loomes, G., & Sugden, R. (1982). Regret theory: An alternative theory of rational choice under uncertainty. The Economic Journal, 92, 805-824.
Morera, O. F., Maydeu-Olivares, A., Nygren, T. E., White, R. J., Fernandez, N. P., & Skewes, M. C. (2006). Social problem solving predicts decision making styles among US Hispanics. Personality and Individual Differences, 41, 307-317.
Nisbett, R. E., Peng, K., Choi, I., & Norenzayan, A. (2001). Culture and systems of thought: holistic versus analytic cognition. Psychological review, 108, 291-310.
Norris, P., Pacini, R., & Epstein, S. (1998). The rational-experiential inventory, short form. Unpublished inventory. University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA.
Nygren, T. E. (1997). Framing of task performance strategies: Effects on performance in a multi-attribute dynamic decision making work environment. Human Factors, 39, 425-437.
Nygren, T. E. (2000, November). Development of a measure of decision making styles to predict performance in a dynamic J/DM task. Paper presented at the 41st Psychonomic Society Meetings, New Orleans, LA.
Nygren, T. E., & White, R. J. (2001, May). Decision making styles and choice behavior in gambling tasks. Paper presented at the 73rd Annual Meeting of the Midwestern Psychological Association, Chicago, IL.
Nygren, T. E., & White, R. J. (2005). Relating decision making styles to predicting self-efficacy and a generalized expectation of success and failure. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society the 49th Annual Meeting.
Parker, A. M., & Fischhoff, B. (2005). Decision making competence: External validation through an individual-differences approach. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 18, 1-27.
Payne, J. W., Bettman, J. R., & Johnson, E. J. (1992). Behavioral decision research: A constructive processing perspective. Annual review of psychology, 43, 87-131.
Payne, J. W., Bettman, J. R., & Johnson, E. J. (1993). The adaptive decision maker. Cambridge University Press.
Reb, J. (2008). Regret aversion and decision process quality: Effects of regret salience on decision process carefulness. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 105, 169-182.
Rim, H. B., Turner, B. M., Betz, N. E., & Nygren, T. E. (2011). Studies of the dimensionality, correlates, and meaning of measures of the maximizing tendency. Judgment and Decision Making, 6, 565-579.
Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image.
Samson, A., & Voyer, B. G. (2012). Two minds, three ways: dual system and dual process models in consumer psychology. AMS Review, 2, 48-71.
Scheier, M. F., Carver, C. S., & Bridges, M. W. (1994). Distinguishing optimism from neuroticism (and trait anxiety, self-mastery, and self-esteem): a reevaluation of the Life Orientation Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 1063-1078.
Schwartz, B., Ward, A., Monterosso, J., Lyubomirsky, S., White, K., & Lehman, D. R. (2002). Maximizing versus satisficing: Happiness is a matter of choice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1178-1197.
Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1995). Decision- making style: The development and assessment of a new measure. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 55, 818-831.
Sherer, M., Maddux, J. E., Mercandante, B., Prentice-Dunn, S., Jacobs, B., & Rogers, R. W. (1982). The self-efficacy scale: Construction and validation. Psychological Reports, 51, 663-671.
Shiloh, S., Koren, S., & Zakay, D. (2001). Individual differences in compensatory decision-making style and need for closure as correlates of subjective decision complexity and difficulty. Personality and Individual Differences, 30, 699-710.
Spinella, M. (2007). Normative data and a short form of the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale. International Journal of Neuroscience, 117, 359-368.
Stanovich, K. E. (1999). Who is rational? Studies of individual differences in reasoning. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (2000). Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debates. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 645-726.
Stanovich, K. E., & Toplak, M. E. (2012). Defining features versus incidental correlates of type 1 and type 2 processing. Mind & Society, 11, 3-13.
Steiger, J. H., & Lind, J. C. (1980, May). Statistically based tests for the number of common factors. In annual meeting of the Psychometric Society, Iowa City, IA.
Taylor, K. (1997). A regret theory approach to assessing consumer satisfaction. Marketing Letters, 8, 229-238.
Tsiros, M., & Mittal, V. (2000). Regret: A model of its antecedents and consequences in consumer decision making. Journal of Consumer Research, 26, 401-417.
Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2011). Construal level theory. In P. Van Lange, A. W. Kruglanski, and E. T. Higgins (Eds), Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology. London: Sage Publications.