바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

Matching effect of temporal distance, self-construal, regulatory focus and temporal consequences

Abstract

The purpose of this study is twofold. It describes two different temporal distance, which is temporal distance in construal level theory and temporal consequences. Also, the research examine matching effects of self-construal, regulatory focus, temporal distance using advertisement message and how it influences temporal consequences. Temporal consequences can be seen as a different type of time perception, which explains how long future events can affect. The result shows that compared to independent self-construal, individuals with an interdependent self-construal consider temporal consequences to be longer. Furthermore, there are matching effect of self-construal, regulatory focus and temporal distance, which seems to amplify the perception of temporal consequences, especially for people with interdependent self-construal.

keywords
self-construal, regulatory focus, temporal distance, temporal consequence

Reference

1.

고성현 (2012). 화장품광고의 조절초점적합성효과에 대한 연구. 한국정책연구, 12(3), 1-14.

2.

김경욱 (2010). 특성불안과 시간거리 지각이 대안의 선호도에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 일반, 29(4), 659-678.

3.

김주석, 이형권 (2012). 조절적합메시지가 소비자반응에 미치는 영향. 한국광고홍보학보, 14(4), 141-176.

4.

양윤, 김민재 (2010). 자기해석, 초점정서, 광고 내 맥락이 금연 공익광고 태도에 미치는 영향. 광고학연구, 21(2), 245-270.

5.

임지은 (2017). 시간적 거리, 해석수준, 주관적 시간 지각이 광고메시지 선호에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 소비자․광고, 18 (3), 441-459.

6.

Aaker, J. L., & Lee, A. Y. (2001). “I” seek pleasures and “we” avoid pains: The role of self-regulatory goals in information processing and persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research, 28(1), 33-49.

7.

Aaker, J. L., & Lee, A. Y. (2006), Understanding Regulatory Fit. Journal of Marketing Research, 43(1), 15-19.

8.

Ariely, D., & Zakay, D. (2001). A timely account of the role of duration in decision making. Acta psychologica, 108(2), 187-207.

9.

Buhrau, D., & Sujan, M. (2014), Temporal mindsets and self-regulation: The motivation and implementation of self-regulatory behaviors. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 25(2), 231-244.

10.

Cesario, J., Grant, H., & Higgins, E. T. (2004). Regulatory fit and persuasion: Transfer from “feeling right.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(3), 388-404.

11.

Chen, M. Y. (2016). Consumer response to health product communication: The role of perceived product efficacy. Journal of Business Research, 69(9), 3251-3260.

12.

Cousins, S. D. (1989). Culture and self-perception in Japan and the United States. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(1), 124-131.

13.

Festjens, A., & Janiszewski, C. (2015). The value of time. Journal of Consumer Research, 42(2), 178-995.

14.

Flinkenflogel, N., Novin, S., Huizinga, M., & Krabbendam, L. (2017). Gender moderates the influence of self-construal priming on fairness considerations. Frontiers in psychology, 8, 503.

15.

Freitas, A. L., & Higgins, E. T. (2002). Enjoying goal-directed action: The role of regulatory fit. Psychological Science, 13(1), 1-6.

16.

Fujita, K. (2011). On conceptualizing self-control as more than the effortful inhibition of impulses. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15(4), 352-366.

17.

Fujita, K., Trope, Y., Liberman, N., & Levin-Sagi, M. (2006). Construal levels and self-control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(3), 351-367.

18.

Garbinsky, E. N., Klesse, A. K., & Aaker, J. (2014). Money in the bank: Feeling powerful increases saving. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(3), 610-623.

19.

Gardner, W. L., Gabriel, S., & Lee, A. Y. (1999). “I” value freedom, but “we” value relationships: Self-construal priming mirrors cultural differences in judgment. Psychological Science, 10(4), 321-326.

20.

Graham, R. J. (1981). The role of perception of time in consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 7(4), 335-342.

21.

Higgins, E. T. (1997). Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist, 52, 1280-1300.

22.

Higgins, E. T. (2000). Making a good decision: Value from fit. American Psychologist, 55(11), 1217-1230.

23.

Higgins, E. T. (2005). Value from regulatory fit. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14(4), 209-213.

24.

Hofstede, G., & Bond, M. H. (1988). The confucious connection: From cultural roots to economic growth. Organizational Dynamics, 16, 4-18.

25.

Hofstede, Hofstede, & Mincov (2010). 차재호, 나은영 공역. 세계의 문화와 조직: 정신의 소프트웨어(3rd ed.).

26.

Joshi, P. D., & Fast, N. J. (2013). Power and reduced temporal discounting. Psychological Science, 24(4), 432-438.

27.

Kanagawa, C., Cross, S. E., & Markus, H. R. (2001). “Who am I?” The cultural psychology of the conceptual self. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(1), 90-103.

28.

Kassam, K. S., Gilbert, D. T., Boston, A., & Wilson, T. D. (2008). Future anhedonia and time discounting. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(6), 1533-1537.

29.

Kees, J., Burton, S., & Tangari, A. H. (2010). The impact of regulatory focus, temporal orientation, and fit on consumer responses to health-related advertising. Journal of Advertising, 39(1), 19-34.

30.

Lee, A. Y., & Aaker, J. L., (2004), Bringing the Frame into Focus: The Influence of Regulatory Fit on Processing Fluency and Persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(2), 205-218.

31.

Lee, A. Y., & Higgins, E. T. (2009). The persuasive power of regulatory fit. In M. Wänke (Ed.), The social psychology of consumer behavior (pp. 319-333), New York: Psychology Press.

32.

Lee, S., Lee, A. Y., & Kern, M. C. (2011). Viewing time through the lens of the self: The fit effect of self‐construal and temporal distance on task perception. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41(2), 191-200.

33.

Lee, A. Y., & Semin, G. R. (2009). 17. Culture through the Lens of Self-Regulatory Orientations. In R. S. Wyer, C. Chiu, Y. Hong(Eds.), Understanding culture: Theory, research, and application. Psychology Press.

34.

Liberman, N., Trope, Y., & Wakslak, C. (2007). Construal level theory and consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17(2), 113-117.

35.

Liberman, N., & Trope, Y. (1998). The role of feasibility and desirability considerations in near and distant future decisions: A test of temporal construal theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(1), 5-18.

36.

Liberman, N., & Trope, Y. (2008). The psychology of transcending the here and now. Science, 322(5905), 1201-1205.

37.

Liberman, N., Trope, Y., McCrea, S. M., & Sherman, S. J. (2007). The effect of level of construal on the temporal distance of activity enactment. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43(1), 143-149.

38.

Maddux, W. W., & Yuki, M. (2006). The “ripple effect”: Cultural differences in perceptions of the consequences of events. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(5), 669-683.

39.

Maglio, S. J., Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2014). From Time Perspective to Psychological Distance (and Back). In M. Stolarski, N. Fieulaine, W. van Beek(Eds), In Time Perspective Theory; Review, Research and Application. Springer International Publishing.

40.

Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98(2), 224-253.

41.

Mogilner, C., Aaker, J. L., & Pennington, G. L. (2007). Time will tell: The distant appeal of promotion and imminent appeal of prevention. Journal of Consumer Research, 34(5), 670-681.

42.

Morris, M. W., & Peng, K. (1994). Culture and cause: American and Chinese attributions for social and physical events. Journal of Personality and Social psychology, 67(6), 949-971.

43.

Norenzayan, A., Choi, I., & Nisbett, R. E. (2002). Cultural similarities and differences in social inference: Evidence from behavioral predictions and lay theories of behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(1), 109-120.

44.

Pennington, G. L., & Roese, N. J. (2003). Regulatory focus and temporal distance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39(6), 563-576.

45.

Peetz, J., & Wilson, A. E. (2008). The temporally extended self: The relation of past and future selves to current identity, motivation, and goal pursuit. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2(6), 2090-2106.

46.

Pounders, K. R., Lee, S., & Mackert, M. (2015). Matching Temporal Frame, Self-View, and Message Frame Valence: Improving Persuasiveness in Health Communications. Journal of Advertising, 44(4), 388-402.

47.

Redelmeier, D. A., & Kahneman, D. (1996). Patients' memories of painful medical treatments: real-time and retrospective evaluations of two minimally invasive procedures. Pain, 66(1), 3-8.

48.

Sackett, A. M., Meyvis, T., Nelson, L. D., Converse, B. A., & Sackett, A. L. (2010). You’re having fun when time flies the hedonic consequences of subjective time progression. Psychological Science, 21(1), 111-117.

49.

Singelis, T. M. (1994). The measurement of independent and interdependent self-construals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20(5),580-591.

50.

Spassova, G., & Lee, A. Y. (2013). Looking into the future: A match between self-view and temporal distance. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(1), 159-171.

51.

Shipp, A. J., Edwards, J. R., & Lambert, L. S. (2009). Conceptualization and measurement of temporal focus: The subjective experience of the past, present, and future. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 110(1), 1-22.

52.

Strathman, A., Gleicher, F., Boninger, D. S., & Edwards, C. S. (1994). The consideration of future consequences: weighing immediate and distant outcomes of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(4), 742-752.

53.

Szpunar, K. K. (2011). On subjective time. Cortex, 47(3), 409-411.

54.

Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2000). Temporal construal and time-dependent changes in preference. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(6), 876-889.

55.

Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2003). Temporal construal. Psychological Review, 110(3), 403-421.

56.

Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2010). Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review, 117(2), 440-463.

57.

Trope, Y., Liberman, N., & Wakslak, C. (2007). Construal levels and psychological distance: Effects on representation, prediction, evaluation, and behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17(2), 83-95.

58.

Wang, M., Rieger, M. O., & Hens, T. (2016). How time preferences differ: Evidence from 53 countries. Journal of Economic Psychology, 52, 115-135.

59.

Wong, V. C., & Wyer Jr, R. S. (2016). Mental traveling along psychological distances: The effects of cultural syndromes, perspective flexibility, and construal level. Journal of personality and social psychology, 111(1), 17-33.

60.

Zhang, Y., & Shrum, L. J. (2008). The influence of self-construal on impulsive consumption. Journal of Consumer Research, 35(5), 838-850.

61.

Zauberman, G., & Urminsky, O. (2016). Consumer intertemporal preferences. Current Opinion in Psychology, 10, 136-141.

62.

Zimbardo, P. G., & Boyd, J. N. (1999). Putting time in perspective: A valid, reliable individual-differences metric. Journal of Personlity and Social Psychology, 77(6), 1271-1288.

logo