바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

Psychological Mechanism Underlying Unconscious Buying Decision

Abstract

As buying environment is getting confused, consumers are having more troubles in concentrating on their buying decision. Previous consumer psychology researches showed a negative view on the quality of buying decision which was made without consciousness. That is, when consumers can not concentrate on their buying decision, they tend to make more irrational decisions than when they can concentrate on it. However, recent decision-making researches are suggesting that the quality of unconscious decision-making might be not worse than that of conscious decision-making. The present research aimed at finding out possible differences between unconscious decision-making mechanism and conscious decision-making mechanism using a brain imaging method. We also tried to figure out how the result of unconscious decision-making is different from that of conscious decision-making via survey method. The brain imaging results showed that participants assigned in a conscious decision-making condition mainly adopted stimulus-based information processing, where they made a final decision based on evaluation and comparison of possible alternatives focusing on each product’s information. In contrast to the conscious decision-making condition, participants in an unconscious decision-making condition mainly adopted memory-based information processing, a simplified version of information processing, where they made their final decision based on calculation result of the evaluated valence of product attributes obtained from their memory of previous experiences with the product. Notwithstanding the differences in a mode of information processing, the results of unconscious decision-making showed very similar quality with the conscious decision-making that is similar mean time to make a decision, an accuracy of choice and satisfaction with products. However, participants in the unconscious decision-making condition showed stronger tendency of postponing their purchase and lower confidence level for their decision. That is although the quality of choice is not different between decision-making with concentration and decision-making without concentration, consumers can't believe their buying decision so they disvalue their choice as impulse buying, irrational buying when they don't concentrate their decision-making.

keywords
unconscious buying decision, the quality of buying decision, mechanism underlying buying decision, brain imaging method

Reference

1.

성영신, 이지량, 신주리, 정용기 (2004). 명품 vs 대중품 브랜드 로고에 대한 소비자 심리비교: fMRI를 통한 지각, 인지 및 정서 반응, 광고학연구. 15(4), 249-276.

2.

소비자보호원. (2000). 20대 소비자 구매실태 보고서.

3.

양윤, 정미경. (1999). CATV 홈쇼핑에서의 지각된 위험과 소비자 특성. 광고학 연구, 10(2), 115-139.

4.

이상빈, 황장선, 리대룡 역 (2004). 소비자행동론. Solomon, M. R.의 Consumer behavior. 브레인코리아.

5.

Alan G. S., James K. R., Jessica A. A., Leigh E. N., Jonathan D. C. (2003). The Neural Basis of Economic decision-Making in the Ultimatum Game. Science, 300,1755-1758.

6.

Alba, J. W. & Hutchinson, J. W. (2000). Knowledge Calibration: What Consumers Know and What They Think They Know. Journal of Consumer Research, 27,(Sep), 123-156.

7.

Ambady, N., Krabbenhoft, M. A., & Hogan, D. (2006). The 30-sec sale: Using thin slice judgments to evaluate sales effectiveness. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 16, 4-13.

8.

Ariely, D. (2000). Controlling the information flow: Effects on consumers' decision making and preferences. Journal of Consumer Research, 27(2), 233-248.

9.

Baba, S. & Huber, J. (2000). The Impact of Anticipating Satisfaction on Consumer Choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 27(Sep), 202-216.

10.

Bar, M. (2003). A Cortical Mechanism for Triggering Top-Down Facilitation in Visual Object Recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 15, 600-609.

11.

Bartels A., & Zeki S. (2000). The neural basis of romantic love. Neuroreport, 11(17), 3829- 3834.

12.

Bartels A., & Zeki S. (2004). The neural correlates of maternal and romantic love. NeuroImage, 21(3), 1155-1166.

13.

Beattie, J. & Barlas, S. (1992). Predicting Perceived Differences in Tradeoff Difficulty. Working paper, University of Sussex.

14.

Betsch, T., Plessner, H., Schwieren, C., & Gütig, R. (2001). I Like it but I Don’t Know Why: A Value-Account Approach to Implicit Attitude Formation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(2), 242-253.

15.

Breiter, H. C., & Rosen, B. R. (1999). Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Brain Reward Circuitry in the Human. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 877, 523-547

16.

Britton, J. C., Phan, K. L., Taylor, S. F., Welsh, R. C., Berridge, K. C., Liberzon, I. (2006). Neural correlates of social and nonsocial emotions: An fMRI Study. Neuroimage. 31(1), 397-409.

17.

Carmon, Z. & Simonson, I. (1998). Price-Quality Tradeoffs in Choice vs. Matching: New Insights into the Prominence Effect. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 7, 323-343.

18.

Chernev, A. (2004). Extremeness Aversion and Attribute-Balance Effects in Choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(2), 249-164.

19.

Conway, M. A., & Pleydell-Pearce, C. W. (2000) The construction of autobiographical memories in the self memory system. Psychological Review, 107, 261-288.

20.

Cooke, A., Meyvis, T., & Schwartz, A. (2001). Avoiding Future Regret in Purchase Timing Decisions. Journal of Consumer Research, 27(Mar), 447-459.

21.

Dehaene, S., Spelke, E., Pinel, P., Stanescu, R., & Tsivkin, S. (1999). Sources of mathematical thinking: Behavioral and brain-imaging evidence. Science, 284, 970–974.

22.

Dhar, R. (1997a). Consumer Preference for a No-Choice option. Journal of Consumer Research, 24(2). 15-31.

23.

Dhar, R. (1997b). Context and Task Effects on Choice Deferral. Marketing Letters, 8(1), 119-130.

24.

Dijksterhuis, A. (2004a). Think different: The merits of unconscious thought in preference development and decision making. Journal of Personality Social Psychology, 87, 586- 598.

25.

Dijksterhuis, A. (2004b). I like myself but I don’t know why: Enhancing implicit self-esteem by subliminal evaluative conditioning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 345-355.

26.

Dijksterhuis A, Bos M.W., Nordgren, L. F., van Baaren, R. B. (2006). On making the right choice: the deliberation-without-attention effect. Science, 17, 1005-1007.

27.

Dijksterhuis, A., & Bos, M.W., Schreers, L., Neimeier, E., & Wassenberg, R. (2005). On cars and oven gloves: Unconscious thought and consumer choice. Manuscript submitted for publication.

28.

Dijksterhuis, A. & Nordgren, L. F. (2006). A theory of unconscious thought. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1(2), 95-109.

29.

Dijksterhuis, A., & Meurs, T. (2006). Where creativity resides: The generative power of unconscious thought. Consciousness and Cognition, 15(1), Issue 1, 135-146

30.

Dijksterhuis, A., & van Olden, Z. (2005). On the benefits of thinking unconsciously: Unconscious thought can increase post-choice satisfaction. Manuscript submitted for publication.

31.

Drolet, A. & Luce, M. F. (2004). The Rationalizing Effects of Cognitive Load on Emotion-Based Trade-off Avoidance. Journal of Consumer Research. 31(1), 63-77.

32.

Gardini, S., Cornoldi, C., De Beni, R., Venneri, A. (2006). Left mediotemporal structures mediate the retrieval of episodic autobiographical mental images, NeuroImage, 30, 645-655.

33.

Haruno, M., Kawato, M. (2006). Different neural correlates of reward expectation and reward expectation error in the putamen and caudate nucleus during stimulus-action- reward association learning. Journal of Neurophysiology, 95, 948-959.

34.

Hastie, R. & Park, B. (1986). The Relationship between Memory and Judgment. Depends on Whether the Task Is Memory-Based or On-line. Psychological Review, 93(3), 258-68.

35.

Kahneman, D. (2003). A Perspective on Judgment and Choice: Mapping Bounded Rationality. American Psychologist, 58(9), 697-720.

36.

Kardes, F. R. (2006). When should consumers and managers trust their intuition? Journal of Consumer Psychology, 16(1), 20-24.

37.

Kirsch, P., Schienle, A., Stark, R., Sammer, G., Blecker, C., Walter, B., Ott, U. Burkart, J., & Vaitl, D. (2003). Anticipation of reward in a non-aversive differential conditioning paradigm and the brain reward system: An event-related fMRI study. NeuroImage, 20, 1086-1095.

38.

Kong, J., Wang, C., Kwong, K., Vangel, M., Chua, E.F., Gollub, R. (2005). The neural substrate of arithmetic operations and procedure complexity. Cognitive Brain Research, 22, 397-405.

39.

Luce, M. F. (1998). Choosing to Avoid: Coping with Negatively Emotion-Laden Consumer Decisions. Journal of Consumer Research, 24 (March), 409-33.

40.

Maddock, R. J., (1999). The retrosplenial cortex and emotion: new insights from functional neuroimaging of the human brain. Trends in Neurosciences, 22, 310-316.

41.

Maddock, R. J., Garrett, A. S. & Buonocore M. H. (2001). Remembering familiar people: the posterior cingulate cortex and autobiographical memory retrieval. Neuroscience, 104(3), 667-76.

42.

McGill, A. & Anand, P. (1989). The Effect of Vivid Attributes on the Evaluation of Alternatives: The Role of Differential Attention and Cognitive Elaboration. Journal of Consumer Research, 16(Sep), 188-96.

43.

Menon V, Rivera SM, White CD, Eliez S, Glover GH, Reiss AL. (2000). Functional optimization of arithmetic processing in perfect performers. Brain Research Cognitive Brain Research 9(3), 343-5.

44.

Mouras H., Stoléru S., Bittoun J., Glutron D., Pélégrini-Issac M., Paradis, Anne-Lise, & Burnod Y. (2003). Brain processing of visual sexual stimuli in healthy men: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. NeuroImage, 20(2), 855-869.

45.

Nowlis, S. M.(1995). The effect of time pressure on the choice between brands that differ in quality, price, and product features. Marketing letters, 6(4), 287-295.

46.

O'Doherty, J. P., Dayan, P.,, Friston, K., Critchley, H. & Dolan, R. J. (2003). Temporal difference learning model accounts for responses in human ventral striatum and orbitofrontal cortex during Pavlovian appetitive learning. Neuron 38, 329-337.

47.

Op de Beeck, H., Beatse, E.,Wagemans, J., Sunaert, S., & Van Hecke, P. (2000). The representation of shape in the context of visual object categorization tasks. NeuroImage, 12(1), 28–40.

48.

Oliver, R. L. (1980). A Cognitive Model of the Antecedents and Consequences of Satisfaction Decisions. Journal of Marketing Research, 17(Nov), 460-469.

49.

Paulus, M. P., Feinstein, J. S., Leland, D. & Simmons, A. N. (2005): Superior temporal gyrus and insula provide response and outcome-dependent information during assessment and action selection in a decision-making situation. NeuroImage. 25, 607-615.

50.

Paulus, M. P., Feinstein, J. S., Tapert, S. F., Liu, T, T. (2004). Trend detection via temporal difference model predicts inferior prefrontal cortex activation during acquisition of advantageous action selection. Neuroimage. 21, 733-743.

51.

Peracchio, L. A.,& Luna, D. (2006). The role of thin-slice judgments in consumer psychology. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 16(1), 25-32.

52.

Phillips, D. M. (1996). Anticipating the Future: The Role of Consumption Visions in Consumer Behavior. in Advances in Consumer Research, 70-75.

53.

Phillips, D. M., Olson, J. C. & Baumgartner, H. (1995). Consumption Visions in Consumer Decision Making. in Advances in Consumer Research, 280-284.

54.

Sanbonmatsu, D. M. & Fazio, R. H. (1990). The Role of Attitudes in Memory-based decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(4), 614-622.

55.

Shanks, D. R. (2006). Complex Choices Better Made Unconsciously? Science, 11, 760-761.

56.

Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (2000a). Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23 (5), 645-665.

57.

Stanovich, K. E. & West, R. F. (2000b). Advancing the rationality debate. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23 (5), 701-726.

58.

Suri, R. & Monroe, K. B. (2003). The Effects of Time Constraints on Consumers’ Judgments of Prices and Products. Journal of Consumer Research, 30 (1), 92-104.

59.

Thompson-Schill, S. L., D'Esposito, M., Aguirre, G. K., & Farah, M. J. (1997). Role of left prefrontal cortex in retrieval of semantic knowledge: A re-evaluation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 94, 14792- 14797.

60.

Walker, B. A. and Olson, J. C. (1997) The activated self in consumer behavior: a cognitive structure perspective. In R.W. Belk(ed.) Research in Consumer Behavior. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press. 135-71.

61.

Wright, P. (1974). The Harrassed Decision Maker: Time Pressure, Distraction, and the Use of Evidence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59, 555-561.

62.

Zago,L. & Tzourio-Mazoyer, N.(2002). Distinguishing visuospatial working memory and complex mental calculation areas within the parietal lobes, Neuroscience Letters, 331, 45–49.

63.

Zysset, S., Huber, O., Ferstl, E. C., & von Cramon, D. Y. (2002). The anterior fronto-median cortex and evaluative judgment: An fMRI study. NeuroImage, 15, 983-991.

logo