바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

메뉴

논문 상세

무의식적 구매결정의 심리적 메커니즘

Psychological Mechanism Underlying Unconscious Buying Decision

초록

소비환경이 혼잡해짐에 따라 소비자는 구매결정에 집중하는데 자주 어려움을 겪는다. 이에 대한 기존 소비자심리학의 관점은 의식적으로 구매결정을 하지 못하는 경우 비합리적인 선택을 가져온다는 것이었지만, 의사결정에 관한 최근 연구는 주의를 집중하지 않은 무의식적 의사결정이 주의를 집중한 의식적 의사결정에 비해 그 질(quality)이 떨어지지 않으며, 오히려 더 나은 선택을 가져오기도 한다는 결과를 제시하고 있다. 본 연구에서는 의식적 구매결정과 무의식적 구매결정의 메커니즘 차이가 무엇인지를 뇌영상촬영법을 이용하여 확인하고, 두 가지 구매결정의 결과가 어떻게 다른가를 알아보고자하였다. 뇌영상촬영법을 이용한 실험 결과, 의식적 구매결정 조건에서 구매결정을 내린 실험 참가자들은, 제품정보에 집중하여 각 대안을 선택했을 때 얻을 수 있는 결과를 평가, 비교하는 과정을 거쳐 제품을 선택하는 자극기반(stimulus-based) 정보처리를 주로 하는 반면, 무의식적 구매결정 시에는 제품관련 기존 경험을 떠올려 각 속성의 유인가(valence)를 평가한 후 이 값을 계산하여 제품을 선택하는 기억기반(memory-based)의 단순화된(simplified) 정보처리를 하였다. 서로 다른 처리과정을 거친 구매결정의 결과를 비교해보면, 무의식적 구매결정조건에서 선택에 걸리는 시간이나 선택의 정확성, 제품만족은 의식적 구매결정조건과 큰 차이를 보이지 않았으나, 구매를 연기하려는 의도가 더 강한 경향성을 보였으며, 구매결정에 대한 확신도 낮았다. 즉 소비자는 주의를 집중하지 않고 무의식적으로 구매 결정을 하였을 때, 의식적으로 구매결정을 하였을 때와는 다른 정보처리과정을 통해 비슷한 질(quality)의 선택을 하였으나, 자신의 구매결정을 신뢰하지는 못하였다.

keywords
무의식적 구매결정, 구매결정의 질, 구매결정 메커니즘, 뇌영상촬영법, unconscious buying decision, the quality of buying decision, mechanism underlying buying decision, brain imaging method

Abstract

As buying environment is getting confused, consumers are having more troubles in concentrating on their buying decision. Previous consumer psychology researches showed a negative view on the quality of buying decision which was made without consciousness. That is, when consumers can not concentrate on their buying decision, they tend to make more irrational decisions than when they can concentrate on it. However, recent decision-making researches are suggesting that the quality of unconscious decision-making might be not worse than that of conscious decision-making. The present research aimed at finding out possible differences between unconscious decision-making mechanism and conscious decision-making mechanism using a brain imaging method. We also tried to figure out how the result of unconscious decision-making is different from that of conscious decision-making via survey method. The brain imaging results showed that participants assigned in a conscious decision-making condition mainly adopted stimulus-based information processing, where they made a final decision based on evaluation and comparison of possible alternatives focusing on each product’s information. In contrast to the conscious decision-making condition, participants in an unconscious decision-making condition mainly adopted memory-based information processing, a simplified version of information processing, where they made their final decision based on calculation result of the evaluated valence of product attributes obtained from their memory of previous experiences with the product. Notwithstanding the differences in a mode of information processing, the results of unconscious decision-making showed very similar quality with the conscious decision-making that is similar mean time to make a decision, an accuracy of choice and satisfaction with products. However, participants in the unconscious decision-making condition showed stronger tendency of postponing their purchase and lower confidence level for their decision. That is although the quality of choice is not different between decision-making with concentration and decision-making without concentration, consumers can't believe their buying decision so they disvalue their choice as impulse buying, irrational buying when they don't concentrate their decision-making.

keywords
unconscious buying decision, the quality of buying decision, mechanism underlying buying decision, brain imaging method

참고문헌

1.

성영신, 이지량, 신주리, 정용기 (2004). 명품 vs 대중품 브랜드 로고에 대한 소비자 심리비교: fMRI를 통한 지각, 인지 및 정서 반응, 광고학연구. 15(4), 249-276.

2.

소비자보호원. (2000). 20대 소비자 구매실태 보고서.

3.

양윤, 정미경. (1999). CATV 홈쇼핑에서의 지각된 위험과 소비자 특성. 광고학 연구, 10(2), 115-139.

4.

이상빈, 황장선, 리대룡 역 (2004). 소비자행동론. Solomon, M. R.의 Consumer behavior. 브레인코리아.

5.

Alan G. S., James K. R., Jessica A. A., Leigh E. N., Jonathan D. C. (2003). The Neural Basis of Economic decision-Making in the Ultimatum Game. Science, 300,1755-1758.

6.

Alba, J. W. & Hutchinson, J. W. (2000). Knowledge Calibration: What Consumers Know and What They Think They Know. Journal of Consumer Research, 27,(Sep), 123-156.

7.

Ambady, N., Krabbenhoft, M. A., & Hogan, D. (2006). The 30-sec sale: Using thin slice judgments to evaluate sales effectiveness. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 16, 4-13.

8.

Ariely, D. (2000). Controlling the information flow: Effects on consumers' decision making and preferences. Journal of Consumer Research, 27(2), 233-248.

9.

Baba, S. & Huber, J. (2000). The Impact of Anticipating Satisfaction on Consumer Choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 27(Sep), 202-216.

10.

Bar, M. (2003). A Cortical Mechanism for Triggering Top-Down Facilitation in Visual Object Recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 15, 600-609.

11.

Bartels A., & Zeki S. (2000). The neural basis of romantic love. Neuroreport, 11(17), 3829- 3834.

12.

Bartels A., & Zeki S. (2004). The neural correlates of maternal and romantic love. NeuroImage, 21(3), 1155-1166.

13.

Beattie, J. & Barlas, S. (1992). Predicting Perceived Differences in Tradeoff Difficulty. Working paper, University of Sussex.

14.

Betsch, T., Plessner, H., Schwieren, C., & Gütig, R. (2001). I Like it but I Don’t Know Why: A Value-Account Approach to Implicit Attitude Formation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(2), 242-253.

15.

Breiter, H. C., & Rosen, B. R. (1999). Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Brain Reward Circuitry in the Human. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 877, 523-547

16.

Britton, J. C., Phan, K. L., Taylor, S. F., Welsh, R. C., Berridge, K. C., Liberzon, I. (2006). Neural correlates of social and nonsocial emotions: An fMRI Study. Neuroimage. 31(1), 397-409.

17.

Carmon, Z. & Simonson, I. (1998). Price-Quality Tradeoffs in Choice vs. Matching: New Insights into the Prominence Effect. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 7, 323-343.

18.

Chernev, A. (2004). Extremeness Aversion and Attribute-Balance Effects in Choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(2), 249-164.

19.

Conway, M. A., & Pleydell-Pearce, C. W. (2000) The construction of autobiographical memories in the self memory system. Psychological Review, 107, 261-288.

20.

Cooke, A., Meyvis, T., & Schwartz, A. (2001). Avoiding Future Regret in Purchase Timing Decisions. Journal of Consumer Research, 27(Mar), 447-459.

21.

Dehaene, S., Spelke, E., Pinel, P., Stanescu, R., & Tsivkin, S. (1999). Sources of mathematical thinking: Behavioral and brain-imaging evidence. Science, 284, 970–974.

22.

Dhar, R. (1997a). Consumer Preference for a No-Choice option. Journal of Consumer Research, 24(2). 15-31.

23.

Dhar, R. (1997b). Context and Task Effects on Choice Deferral. Marketing Letters, 8(1), 119-130.

24.

Dijksterhuis, A. (2004a). Think different: The merits of unconscious thought in preference development and decision making. Journal of Personality Social Psychology, 87, 586- 598.

25.

Dijksterhuis, A. (2004b). I like myself but I don’t know why: Enhancing implicit self-esteem by subliminal evaluative conditioning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 345-355.

26.

Dijksterhuis A, Bos M.W., Nordgren, L. F., van Baaren, R. B. (2006). On making the right choice: the deliberation-without-attention effect. Science, 17, 1005-1007.

27.

Dijksterhuis, A., & Bos, M.W., Schreers, L., Neimeier, E., & Wassenberg, R. (2005). On cars and oven gloves: Unconscious thought and consumer choice. Manuscript submitted for publication.

28.

Dijksterhuis, A. & Nordgren, L. F. (2006). A theory of unconscious thought. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1(2), 95-109.

29.

Dijksterhuis, A., & Meurs, T. (2006). Where creativity resides: The generative power of unconscious thought. Consciousness and Cognition, 15(1), Issue 1, 135-146

30.

Dijksterhuis, A., & van Olden, Z. (2005). On the benefits of thinking unconsciously: Unconscious thought can increase post-choice satisfaction. Manuscript submitted for publication.

31.

Drolet, A. & Luce, M. F. (2004). The Rationalizing Effects of Cognitive Load on Emotion-Based Trade-off Avoidance. Journal of Consumer Research. 31(1), 63-77.

32.

Gardini, S., Cornoldi, C., De Beni, R., Venneri, A. (2006). Left mediotemporal structures mediate the retrieval of episodic autobiographical mental images, NeuroImage, 30, 645-655.

33.

Haruno, M., Kawato, M. (2006). Different neural correlates of reward expectation and reward expectation error in the putamen and caudate nucleus during stimulus-action- reward association learning. Journal of Neurophysiology, 95, 948-959.

34.

Hastie, R. & Park, B. (1986). The Relationship between Memory and Judgment. Depends on Whether the Task Is Memory-Based or On-line. Psychological Review, 93(3), 258-68.

35.

Kahneman, D. (2003). A Perspective on Judgment and Choice: Mapping Bounded Rationality. American Psychologist, 58(9), 697-720.

36.

Kardes, F. R. (2006). When should consumers and managers trust their intuition? Journal of Consumer Psychology, 16(1), 20-24.

37.

Kirsch, P., Schienle, A., Stark, R., Sammer, G., Blecker, C., Walter, B., Ott, U. Burkart, J., & Vaitl, D. (2003). Anticipation of reward in a non-aversive differential conditioning paradigm and the brain reward system: An event-related fMRI study. NeuroImage, 20, 1086-1095.

38.

Kong, J., Wang, C., Kwong, K., Vangel, M., Chua, E.F., Gollub, R. (2005). The neural substrate of arithmetic operations and procedure complexity. Cognitive Brain Research, 22, 397-405.

39.

Luce, M. F. (1998). Choosing to Avoid: Coping with Negatively Emotion-Laden Consumer Decisions. Journal of Consumer Research, 24 (March), 409-33.

40.

Maddock, R. J., (1999). The retrosplenial cortex and emotion: new insights from functional neuroimaging of the human brain. Trends in Neurosciences, 22, 310-316.

41.

Maddock, R. J., Garrett, A. S. & Buonocore M. H. (2001). Remembering familiar people: the posterior cingulate cortex and autobiographical memory retrieval. Neuroscience, 104(3), 667-76.

42.

McGill, A. & Anand, P. (1989). The Effect of Vivid Attributes on the Evaluation of Alternatives: The Role of Differential Attention and Cognitive Elaboration. Journal of Consumer Research, 16(Sep), 188-96.

43.

Menon V, Rivera SM, White CD, Eliez S, Glover GH, Reiss AL. (2000). Functional optimization of arithmetic processing in perfect performers. Brain Research Cognitive Brain Research 9(3), 343-5.

44.

Mouras H., Stoléru S., Bittoun J., Glutron D., Pélégrini-Issac M., Paradis, Anne-Lise, & Burnod Y. (2003). Brain processing of visual sexual stimuli in healthy men: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. NeuroImage, 20(2), 855-869.

45.

Nowlis, S. M.(1995). The effect of time pressure on the choice between brands that differ in quality, price, and product features. Marketing letters, 6(4), 287-295.

46.

O'Doherty, J. P., Dayan, P.,, Friston, K., Critchley, H. & Dolan, R. J. (2003). Temporal difference learning model accounts for responses in human ventral striatum and orbitofrontal cortex during Pavlovian appetitive learning. Neuron 38, 329-337.

47.

Op de Beeck, H., Beatse, E.,Wagemans, J., Sunaert, S., & Van Hecke, P. (2000). The representation of shape in the context of visual object categorization tasks. NeuroImage, 12(1), 28–40.

48.

Oliver, R. L. (1980). A Cognitive Model of the Antecedents and Consequences of Satisfaction Decisions. Journal of Marketing Research, 17(Nov), 460-469.

49.

Paulus, M. P., Feinstein, J. S., Leland, D. & Simmons, A. N. (2005): Superior temporal gyrus and insula provide response and outcome-dependent information during assessment and action selection in a decision-making situation. NeuroImage. 25, 607-615.

50.

Paulus, M. P., Feinstein, J. S., Tapert, S. F., Liu, T, T. (2004). Trend detection via temporal difference model predicts inferior prefrontal cortex activation during acquisition of advantageous action selection. Neuroimage. 21, 733-743.

51.

Peracchio, L. A.,& Luna, D. (2006). The role of thin-slice judgments in consumer psychology. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 16(1), 25-32.

52.

Phillips, D. M. (1996). Anticipating the Future: The Role of Consumption Visions in Consumer Behavior. in Advances in Consumer Research, 70-75.

53.

Phillips, D. M., Olson, J. C. & Baumgartner, H. (1995). Consumption Visions in Consumer Decision Making. in Advances in Consumer Research, 280-284.

54.

Sanbonmatsu, D. M. & Fazio, R. H. (1990). The Role of Attitudes in Memory-based decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(4), 614-622.

55.

Shanks, D. R. (2006). Complex Choices Better Made Unconsciously? Science, 11, 760-761.

56.

Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (2000a). Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23 (5), 645-665.

57.

Stanovich, K. E. & West, R. F. (2000b). Advancing the rationality debate. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23 (5), 701-726.

58.

Suri, R. & Monroe, K. B. (2003). The Effects of Time Constraints on Consumers’ Judgments of Prices and Products. Journal of Consumer Research, 30 (1), 92-104.

59.

Thompson-Schill, S. L., D'Esposito, M., Aguirre, G. K., & Farah, M. J. (1997). Role of left prefrontal cortex in retrieval of semantic knowledge: A re-evaluation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 94, 14792- 14797.

60.

Walker, B. A. and Olson, J. C. (1997) The activated self in consumer behavior: a cognitive structure perspective. In R.W. Belk(ed.) Research in Consumer Behavior. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press. 135-71.

61.

Wright, P. (1974). The Harrassed Decision Maker: Time Pressure, Distraction, and the Use of Evidence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59, 555-561.

62.

Zago,L. & Tzourio-Mazoyer, N.(2002). Distinguishing visuospatial working memory and complex mental calculation areas within the parietal lobes, Neuroscience Letters, 331, 45–49.

63.

Zysset, S., Huber, O., Ferstl, E. C., & von Cramon, D. Y. (2002). The anterior fronto-median cortex and evaluative judgment: An fMRI study. NeuroImage, 15, 983-991.

logo