바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

Korean Journal of School Psychology

The Roles of Authoritarian Personality and Popularity in School Bullying

Abstract

The hierarchy in classrooms and the participant roles in bullying are suggested to be the importantpredictors of school bullying. With the hypothesis that student's authoritarian personality would have animportant bearing in bullying, which occurs from the formation of in-class ranks and the differentiation ofparticipant roles, the current study investigated the effects of authoritarian personality on differentparticipant roles in bullying situations (bully, follower, victim, outsider, and defender) with regard toin-class popularity. 559 first-grade co-ed middle school students in Seoul and Gyeonggi Provinceparticipated. Bullying, following, and ignoring were positively correlated to each other, and both bullyingand following showed positive correlations to being-victimized. Also, bullying, following, ignoring, andbeing-victimized were positively correlated with authoritarian personality while ignoring andbeing-victimized were negatively correlated with popularity. In regression analyses, authoritarian personalitywas found to be an important factor in predicting pro-bullying behaviors such as bullying and following,showing that authoritarian students took the leading roles in bullying. Ignoring and being-victimizedoccurred more with high authoritarian personality and low popularity. However, neither of them weresuitable for explaining defending behavior. Indicating the authoritarian aspect of school bullying, theresults showed the effects of authoritarian personality and popularity in accordance with each of theparticipant roles in school bullying.

keywords
School Bullying, Participant Roles, Authoritarian Personality, Popularity, 학교괴롭힘, 참여자 역할, 권위주의 성격, 인기도

Reference

1.

강은희, 이은희, 임은정 (2002). 집단따돌림 행동유형과 심리적 특성. 한국심리학회지 상담 및 심리치료, 14(2), 445-460.

2.

곽금주 (1999). 학교폭력 및 왕따 예방프로그램(Ⅰ): 개관. 한국심리학회지: 사회문제, 5(2), 105-122.

3.

구본용 (1997). 청소년의 집단따돌림의 원인과지도방안. 청소년대화의 광장, 청소년상담문제 연구보고서.

4.

김경학 (2013, 5, 24). 학생들이 그린 교실 내서열 ‘학급 카스트’ 공개… 약자도 목소리낼 수 있는 분위기 조성. 경향신문. http://www.khan.co.kr에서 2013, 5, 25 인출.

5.

김경동 (1993). 한국사회 변동론. 서울: 나남.

6.

김연주 (2012, 4, 30). 조선일보. 학교폭력 절반이상이 “장난으로”, “이유 없이.” http://www.chosun.com에서 2012, 10, 15 인출.

7.

김재신, 한성열 (2004). 권위주의 성격에 따른공정과 인정의 갈등상황에서의 판단: 이중잣대를 가진 사람은 누구인가? 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 18(3), 97-114.

8.

김정원, 김광웅 (2003). 집단 따돌림 가해-피해에 따른 청소년의 자아존종감과 대인관계성향. 한국인간발달학회, 10(1), 21-35.

9.

김혜원, 이해경 (2000). 학생들의 집단괴롭힘관련경험에 대한 예언변인들의 탐색: 초, 중, 고등학생간 비교를 중심으로. 교육심리연구, 15(1), 183-210.

10.

뉴스와이어 (2013. 11. 29). 교육부, 학교폭력실태조사 및 정보공시 분석결과 발표. http://www.newswire.co.kr/newsRead.php?no=725706. 2013. 12. 6. 인출.

11.

도금혜, 최보가 (2007). 청소년의 또래집단이지각한 인기도에 영향을 미치는 생태학적변인. 한국청소년연구, 18(1), 107-134.

12.

도금혜, 최보가, 이지민 (2005). 청소년의 사회측정적 인기도 및 지각된 인기도와 공격성과의 관계. 대한가정학회지, 43(2), 57-67.

13.

도금혜, 최보가, 이지민 (2006). 청소년의 지각된 인기도에 따른 공격성과 자아존중감. 대한가정학회지, 44(2), 1-11.

14.

민경환 (1989). 권위주의 성격과 사회적 편견:대학생집단을 중심으로. 한국심리학회지:사회 및 성격, 4(2), 146-168.

15.

박경숙, 손희권, 송혜정 (1998). 학생의 왕따(집단따돌림 및 괴롭힘) 현상에 관한 연구(No. 19). 한국교육개발원.

16.

서미정 (2008). 방관자의 집단 특성에 따른 또래 괴롭힘 참여 역할 행동. 아동학회지, 29(5), 79-96.

17.

신수진, 최준식 (2002). 현대한국사회의 이중가치 체계. 아산재단 연구 총서 108집. 서울:집문당.

18.

신지은, 심은정 (2013). 집단따돌림 관여유행에따른 심리적 특성의 차이. 한국심리학회지: 학교, 10(1), 19-39.

19.

심희옥 (2008). 또래 괴롭힘 참여자의 사회적지위 및 사회적 정서에 관한 연구: 성별을 중심으로. 아동학회지, 29(3), 191-205.

20.

엄명용, 송민경 (2011). 학교 내 청소년들의 권력관계 유형과 학교폭력 참여 역할 유형. 한국사회복지학, 63(1), 241-266.

21.

오승환 (2007). 청소년의 집단괴롭힘 관련 경험에 영향을 미치는 생태체계적 요인 분석. 정신보건과 사회사업, 25, 74-98.

22.

유계숙, 이승출, 이혜미 (2013). 집단따돌림 참여자 역할에 영향을 미치는 개인, 가족, 학교 관련변인. 한국가족관계학회지, 18(3), 63-89.

23.

윤상연, 한성열 (2008). 권위주의적인 사람은항상 권위에 복종적일까?: 권위주의 성격에 따른 권위관계 상황별 복종의 차이. 한국심리학회지: 사회문제, 14(3), 41-56.

24.

이명신 (2002). 괴롭힘 가해자의 환경적 요인, 괴롭힘 행동유형, 가해자의심리, 행동적결과에 대한 연구. 한국사회복지학회지, 31(11), 29-61.

25.

이상균 (2005). 청소년의 또래폭력 가해경험에대한 생태 체계적 영향 요인. 한국아동복지학, 19, 41-170.

26.

이승연, 송경희 (2012). 남녀 중학생의 부/모애착과 또래괴롭힘 방어, 방관행동의 관계: 정서조절과 사회적 자기효능감의 매개효과. 한국심리학회지: 학교, 9(2), 393-415.

27.

이은희, 강은희 (2003). 청소년들의 지배성, 우월감, 자기찬미, 신뢰결핍과 집단따돌림 행동간의 관계. 한국심리학회지: 건강, 8(2), 323-353.

28.

이혜영 (1999). 따돌림 해결을 위한 학교모델, 따돌림 해결을 위한 현장모델 개발. 서울특별시 청소년종합상담실, 제2회 청소년상담 심포지엄 자료집, 9-18.

29.

임재연 (2013). 또래 괴롭힘 참여역할에 따른긍정적 강점의 차이: 또래 괴롭힘 예방을위한 피해방어자의 긍정적 강점. 학교사회복지, 24, 131-151.

30.

전주연, 이은경, 유나현, 이기학 (2004). 집단따돌림에 대한 동조성향과 심리적 특성과의 관계 연구. 한국심리학회지: 학교, 1(1), 23-35.

31.

차윤희, 박경자 (2011). 또래 괴롭힘 상황에서학령기 아동의 역할과 사회적 이해. 생애학회지, 1(1), 47-67.

32.

청소년폭력예방재단 (1996). 학교폭력, 고통받는아이들을 위해 무엇을 할 것인가? 서울: 한울림.

33.

최지영, 허유성 (2008). 괴롭힘 상황에서의 참여자 역할 및 관계적 공격행동 지각유형에 따른 도덕판단력과 사회적 상호의존성. 청소년학연구, 15(6), 171-196.

34.

한국교육개발원 (2013). 2012 KEDI 연차보고서. 서울: 한국교육개발원.

35.

한종철, 김인경, 김은정, 박윤창, 정태연 (1999). 또래 따돌림과 심리사회적 부적응: 1차 연구. 한국심리학회 연차대회초록집.

36.

Adorno, T. W., Frenkel-Brunswik, E., Levinson, D. J., & Sanford, R. N. (1950). The authoritarian personality. New York: Harper.

37.

Altemayer, B. (1988). Enemies of freedom:Understanding right-wing authoritarianism. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

38.

Altemeyer, B. (1996). The authoritarian specter. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

39.

Altemeyer, B. (1998). The other ‘authoritarian personality.’ In M. Zanna (Ed.) Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 30 (pp. 47-92). San Diego: Academic Press.

40.

Antti, K. Ã., Voeten, M., Poskiparta, E., & Salmivalli, C. (2010). Vulnerable children in varying classroom contexts: Bystanders'behaviors moderate the effects of risk factors on victimization. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 56(3), 261-282.

41.

Baldry, A. C., & Farrington, D. P. (2000). Bullies and delinquents: Personal characteristics and parental styles. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 10, 17-31.

42.

Bandura, A. (1969). Social-learning theory of identificatory processes. In D. A. Goslin (Ed.), Handbook of socialization theory and research (pp. 213-262). Chicago: McNally.

43.

Bansel, P., Davies, B., Laws, C., & Linnell, S. (2009). Bullies, bullying and power in the contexts of schooling. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 30(1) 59-69.

44.

Bernstein, J. Y., & Watson, M. W. (1997). Children Who Are Targets of Bullying A Victim Pattern. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 12(4), 483-498.

45.

Besag, V. E. (1989). Bullies and victims in schools. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.

46.

Boulton, M. J. (1997). Teachers' views on bullying:Definitions, attitudes and ability to cope. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 67(2), 223-233.

47.

Boulton, M. J., & Smith, P. K. (1994). Bully/victim problems in middle-school children: Stability, self-perceived competence, peer perceptions and peer acceptance. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 12(3), 315-329.

48.

Boulton, M. J., & Underwood, K. (1992). Bully/victim problems among middle school children. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 62(1), 73-87.

49.

Byrne, B. J. (1994). Bullies and victims in a school setting with reference to some Dublin schools. The Irish Journal of Psychology, 15, 574-586.

50.

Caravita, S., Di Blasio, P., & Salmivalli, C. (2009). Unique and interactive effects of empathy and social status on involvement in bullying. Social Development, 18(1), 140-163.

51.

Chen, J. K., & Astor, R. A. (2009). The perpetration of school violence in Taiwan: An analysis of gender, grade level and school type. School Psychology International, 30(6), 568-584.

52.

Cillessen, A. H., & Borch, C. (2006). Developmental trajectories of adolescent popularity: A growth curve modelling analysis. Journal of Adolescence, 29(6), 935-959.

53.

Coie, J. D., Dodge, K. A., & Kupersmidt, J. B. (1990). Peer group behavior and social status. In S. R. Asher & J. D. Coie (Eds.), Peer rejection in childhood (pp. 17-57). New York:Cambridge University Press.

54.

Cornell, D. G., & Brockenbrough, K. (2004). Identification of bullies and victims: A comparison of methods. Journal of School Violence, 3(2-3), 63-87.

55.

Davidson, L. M., & Demaray, M. K. (2007). Social support as a moderator between victimization and internalizing-externalizing distress from bullying. School Psychology Review, 36(3), 383-405.

56.

Dodge, K. A. (2006). Translational Science in action: Hostile attributional style and the development of aggressive behavior problems. Developmental and Psychopathology, 18, 791-814.

57.

Duncan, R. D. (1999). Peer and sibling aggression:An investigation of intra-and extra-familial bullying. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 14(8), 871-886.

58.

Espelage, D. L., & Holt, M. K. (2001). Bullying and victimization during early adolescence:Peer influences and psychosocial correlates. Journal of Emotional Abuse, 2, 123-142.

59.

Espelage, D. L., & Swearer, S. M. (2003). Research on school bullying and victimization: What have we learned and where do we go from here? School Psychology Review, 32, 365-383.

60.

Faris, R., & Felmlee, D. (2011). Status struggles:Network centrality and gender segregation in same- and cross-gender aggression. American Sociological Review, 76(1), 48-73.

61.

Farrington, D. P. (1993). Understanding and preventing bullying. Crime and justice, 17, 381-458.

62.

Galen, B. R., & Underwood, M. K. (1997). A developmental investigation of social aggression among children. Developmental Psychology, 33(4), 589.

63.

Gini, G., Pozzoli, T., Borghi, F., & Franzoni, L. (2008). The role of bystanders in students'perception of bullying and sense of safety. Journal of School Psychology, 46(6), 617-638.

64.

Haynie, D. L., Nansel, T., Eitel, P., Crump, A. D., Saylor, K., Yu, K., & Simons-Morton, B. (2001). Bullies, victims, and bully/victims:Distinct groups of at-risk youth. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 21(1), 29-49.

65.

Hazler, R. J., Carney, J. V., Green, S., Powell, R., & Jolly, L. S. (1997). Areas of expert agreement on identification of school bullies and victims. School Psychology International, 18, 3-12.

66.

Henry, D., Guerra, N., Huesmann, R., Tolan, P., VanAcker, R., & Eron, L. (2000). Normative influences on aggression in urban elementary school classrooms. American Journal of Community Psychology, 28(1), 59-81.

67.

Hodges, E. V. E., & Perry, D. G. (1999). Personal and interpersonal consequences of victimization by peers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 677-685.

68.

Hugh-Jones, S., & Smith, P. K. (1999). Selfreports of short- and long-term effects of bullying on children who stammer. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 69, 141-158.

69.

Juvonen, J., & Ho, A. Y. (2009). Social motives underlying antisocial behavior across middle school grades. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 37(6), 747-756.

70.

Knafo, A. (2003). Authoritarians, the next generation: Values and bullying among adolescent children of authoritarian fathers. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 3(1), 199-204.

71.

Lee, S. S., & Wong, D. S. (2009). School, parents, and peer factors in relation to Hong Kong students’s bullying. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 15, 217-233.

72.

Lee, V., & Hoaken, P. N. S. (2007). Cognition, emotion, and neurobiological development:Mediating the relation between maltreatment and aggression. Child Maltreatment, 12, 281-298.

73.

Lipetz, M. E., & Ossorio, P. G. (1967). Authoritarianism, aggression, and status. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 5(4), 468-472.

74.

Lowenstein, L. F. (1978). Who is the bully? Bulletin of the British Psychological Society, 31, 147-149.

75.

Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50(4), 370-396.

76.

McConville, D. W., & Cornell, D. G. (2003). Aggressive attitudes predict aggressive behavior in middle school students. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 11(3), 179-187.

77.

Mynard, H., & Joseph, S. (1997). Bully/victim problems and their association with Eysenck's personality dimensions in 8 to 13 year olds. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 67(1), 51-54.

78.

Naito, T. (1990). Moral eduation in Japanese public schools. Moral Education Forum, 15, 27-36.

79.

Nansel, T. R., Overpeck, M., Pilla, R. S., Ruan, W. J., Simons-Morton, B., & Scheidt, P. (2001). Bullying behaviors among US youth. JAMA: the Journal of the American Medical Association, 285(16), 2094-2100.

80.

Nudo, L. (2004). Fighting the real bullies. Prevention, 56(11), 123-124.

81.

Olweus, D. (1993). Bullying at school: What we know and what we can do. NY: Blackwell.

82.

Olweus, D. (1994). Bullying at school: Basic facts and effects of a school based intervention program. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 35, 1171-1190.

83.

Olweus, D. (1997). Bully/victim problems in school: Facts and intervention. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 12(4), 495-510.

84.

Pellegrini, A. D. (2002). Bullying, victimization, and sexual harassment during the transition to middle school. Educational Psychologist, 37, 151-163.

85.

Pellegrini, A. D., Bartini, M., & Brooks, F. (1999). School bullies, victims, and aggressive victims: factors relating to group affiliation and victimization in early adolescence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(2), 216-224.

86.

Peterson, B. E., Smirles, K. A., & Wentworth, P. A. (1997). Generativity and authoritarianism:Implications for personality, political involvement, and parenting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(5), 1202-1216.

87.

Pöyhönen, V., Juvonen, J., & Salmivalli, C. (2010). What does it take to stand up for the victim of bullying?: The interplay between personal and social factors. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 56(2), 143-163.

88.

Rigby K. (1999). Peer victimization at school and the health of secondary school students. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 69, 95-104.

89.

Roberts, A. H., & Jessor, R. (1958). Authoritarianism, punitiveness, and perceived social status. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 56, 311-314.

90.

Roland, E., & Idsøe, T. (2001). Aggression and bullying. Aggressive behavior, 27(6), 446-462.

91.

Salmivalli, C., Huttunen, A., & Lagerspetz, K. M. (1997). Peer networks and bullying in schools. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 38(4), 305-312.

92.

Salmivalli, C., & Isaacs, J. (2005). Prospective Relations Among Victimization, Rejection, Friendlessness, and Children's Self‐and Peer Perceptions. Child Development, 76(6), 1161-1171.

93.

Salmivalli, C., Lagerspetz, K., Bjὂrkqvist, K., Ȍsterman, K., & Kaukiainen, A. (1996). Bullying as a group process: Participant roles and their relations to social status within the group. Aggressive Behavior, 22, 1-15.

94.

Schwartz, D., McFadyen-Ketchum, S. A., Dodge, K. A., Pettit, G. S., & Bates, J. E. (1998). Peer group victimization as a predictor of children's behavior problems at home and in school. Development and Psychopathology, 10(1), 87-99.

95.

Salmivalli, C., Ojanen, T., Haanpää, J., & Peets, K. (2005). “I'm OK but you're not” and other peer-relational schemas: Explaining individual differences in children's social goals. Developmental Psychology, 41(2), 363-375.

96.

Salmivalli, C., & Peets, K. (2009). Bullies, victims, and bully-victim relationships in middle childhood and early adolescence. Handbook of Peer Interactions, Relationships, and Groups, 322-340.

97.

Salmivalli, C., & Voten, M. (2004). Connections between attitudes, group norms, and behavior in bullying situations. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 28, 246-258.

98.

Sijtsema, J. J., Veenstra, R., Lindenberg, S., & Salmivalli, C. (2009). Empirical test of bullies'status goals: Assessing direct goals, aggression, and prestige. Aggressive Behavior, 35(1), 57-67.

99.

Smith, P. K., & Myron-Wilson, R. (1998). Parenting and school bullying. Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 3(3), 405-417.

100.

Smith, P. K., & Sharp, S. (1994). School bullying:Insights and perspectives. London: Routledge.

101.

Solberg, M. E., & Olweus, D. (2003). Prevalence estimation of school bullying with the Olweus Bully/Victim Questionnaire. Aggressive Behavior, 29(3), 239-268.

102.

Sutton, J., & Smith, P. K. (1999). Bullying as a group process: An adaptation of the participant role approach. Aggressive Behavior, 25(2), 97-111.

103.

Walker, W. D., Rowe, R. C., & Quinsey, V. L. (1993). Authoritarianism and sexual aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(5), 1036-1045.

104.

Weitman, M. (1962). More than one kind of authoritarian. Journal of Personality, 30, 193-208.

105.

Wright, J. M., & Harvey, O. J. (1965). Attitude change as a function of authoritarianism and punitiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1, 177-181.

106.

Yang, S. J., Kim, J. M., Kim, S. W., Shin, I. S., & Yoon, J. S. (2006). Bullying and victimization behaviors in boys and girls at South Korean primary schools. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 45(1), 69-77.

Korean Journal of School Psychology