Teachers’ Competency Research of prevention and intervention of School Violence through Students' Experience
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to closely examine teachers' competency in prevention and intervention of school violence based on students' experience. In order to achieve this, a total of 10 students (victims and perpetrators) who have experienced school violence and how it was handled by the school were interviewed. Afterwards, the interviews were analyzed by Consensual Qualitative Research (CQR). Results indicate that teachers' competency on school violence which were considered important by the students have been divided into a total of 4 areas and 16 categories. 4 areas are the following; awareness and attitudes of teachers toward school violence, procedures and methods of intervention by teachers, skills and competence of teachers in dealing with school violence issues, and ability of teachers in preventing school violence. According to the perspectives of students, it is necessary for teachers to have awareness and attitudes in acknowledging the seriousness of even the minor school violence cases and trying to resolve those cases actively and properly, to have methods to intervene in an educational way to follow the principles of the procedures, to have skills and competence to counsel, mediate and supervise relevant students, to establish positive relationships with students, and to have leadership and class managing skills to prevent school violence. This study is expected to provide fundamental research data to reinforce the competency of teachers in prevention and intervention of school violence. Especially this study is significant as it presents teachers' competency of differentiated intervention when dealing with victims and perpetrators at school. Also, based on the results of this study, the commonalities and the differences between the perspectives of students and the perspectives of teachers (from the preceding research) regarding the competency of teachers concerning school violence were discussed.
- keywords
- 학교폭력, 예방 및 대처, 교사역량, 학생경험, 합의적 질적 연구, school violence, prevention and intervention, teachers’ competency, students' experience, consensual qualitative research
Reference
강소영 (2013). 학교폭력에 대한 근거이론의 접근,폭력적 교실문화 현상을 중심으로. 한국범죄심리연구, 8(2), 5-28.
교육부 (2016). 2016년 2차 학교폭력 실태조사 결과 발표. 2016.12.5.
교육부 (2015). 학교폭력 사안처리 가이드북. 교육부.
교육부 (2013). 현장중심 학교폭력 대책.보도자료. 2013.7.23. www.moe.go.kr.
교육부 (2012a). 학교폭력근절 종합대책.보도자료. 2012.2.6. www.moe.go.kr.
교육부 (2012b). 교사 신규채용제도 개선방안 보도자료. 2012.2.15.
권혁운 (2011). 초등학교 교사의 직무기준 설정에 관한 연구. 한국교원교육연구. 27(3), 191-214.
김은영 (2008). 학교분위기가 중학생의 또래폭력 피해경험에 미치는 영향. 한국아동복지학. 26, 88-111.
김창환 외 (2014). 한국의 교육지표․지수 개발 연구(Ⅲ): 대학생역량지수 개발 연구. 한국교육개발원
김혜원, 이혜경 (2010). 집단괴롭힘의 가해와 피해행동에 영향을 미치는 사회적 심리적 변인들. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 14(1), 45-64
김희규, 주영효 (2014). 신규교사 직무역량 실태 분석. 교육문제연구. 27(3), 1-25.
박용호, 조대연, 배현경, 이해정 (2012). 중등교사의 직무역량 요구분석. 한국교원교육연구. 29(2), 299-320.
박효정 외 (2014). 학교폭력예방문화 분석을 위한 중학교 사례연구 우수사례. 한국교육개발원.
방기연 (2011). 학교폭력 사건에 대한 교사의 인식과 경험에 대한 질적연구. 상담학연구. 12(5), 1753-1778.
법제처 (2016). 학교폭력 예방 및 대책에 관한 법률. http://www.moleg.go.kr
서정기 (2012). 학교폭력 이후 해결과정에서 경험하는 갈등의 구조적 요인에 대한 질적 사례연구. 교육인류학연구. 15(3), 133- 164.
신성자 (2012). 학교폭력 가해․피해학생을 위한 교사의 원조개입효능감에 영향을 주는 요인에 대한 연구. 한국사회복지학. 64(1), 79-100.
신성자, 권신영 (2013). 학교폭력에 대한 교사의 개입수준과 관련요인들의 10년의 변화추이에 대한 분석. 학교사회복지. 26, 177- 207.
신성자, 정숙희 (2010). 교사가 지각하는 학교업무환경과 학생의 개인특성이 신체적, 비신체적 또래폭력 피해경험에 미치는 영향. 학교사회복지. 19, 141-172.
오승환 (2007). 청소년의 집단괴롭힘 관련 경험에 영향을 미치는 생태체계적 요인분석. 정신보건과 사회사업. 25(4), 87-108.
이대성 (2012). 학교폭력 해결을 위한 사회과 교사의 역할과 전문성 신장; 법과 인권교육의 관점에서. 법과인권교육연구. 5(2), 87-108
이미형, 임지영, 이순득, 오승은 (2009). 학교폭력에 관한 교사의 인식. 한국보건간호학회지. 23(2), 87-108.
임재연 (2017). 학교폭력 예방 및 대처를 위해 필요한 교사역량에 관한 질적연구. 교원교육. 33(2), 143-169
임재연, 박종효 (2015). 학교폭력 예방 및 대처를 위한 교사역량 진단척도 개발 연구, 교육학연구, 53(3), 407-434.
청소년폭력예방재단 (2015). 전국 학교폭력 실태조사 결과 보고서. 청소년폭력예방재단
청소년폭력예방재단 (2011). 전국 학교폭력 실태조사 결과 보고서. 청소년폭력예방재단
홍지영, 유정이 (2013). 학교폭력 사건 피해학생 학부모의 경험에 대한 질적연구. 청소년상담연구, 21(1), 107-145
Beran, T .N. (2006). Preparing Teachers to Manage School Bullying: The Hidden Curriculum, The Journal of Educational Thought; 40(2), 119-128.
Dubois, D., Rothwell, W. J., Deborah, J. K. S., & Klemp, L. K. (2004). Competency-based human resource management. Davies-Black. Publishing Palo Alto, California.
Espelage, D. L., & Sweare, S. M. (2004). Bullying in schools; A social-ecological perspective on prevention and intervention. Malwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Hektner,J . M., & Swenson, C. A. (2012). Linksfrom teacher beliefs to peer victimization and bystander intervention: Tests of mediatingprocesses. Journal of Early Adolescence, 32, 516–536
Hill, C. E. (2016). Consensual qualitative research (F. W. Joo, E. S. Trans.). Seoul: Hakjisa. (Original work published 2012)
Hill, C. E. et al. (2005). Consensual qualitative research: An update. Journal of counseling psychology, 52(2), 196-205.
Humpert, W & Dann, H.-D. (2001). Kompakt Basistraining zur Störungsreduktion und Gewaltprävention für pädagogische und helfende Berufe auf der Grundlage des Konstanzer Trainingsmodells, Bern, Verlag Hans Huber
Iseli, K. (2014). Gewalt an Schulen; Relevanz der Persönlichkeitsfaktoren von Lehrper- sonen für die schulische Gewaltprävention, Dissertation von Universität Hildesheim.
Melzer, W., & Mühl, M., & Ackermann, C. (1998). Schulkultur und ihre Auswirkung auf Gewalt, in; Forschungsgruppe Schulevaluation, Gewaltals soziales Problem in Schulen, Leske+Budrich, Opladen
Spencer, L., & Spencer, S. (1993), Competency at work: Models for superior performance. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
Troop-Gordon, W., & Ladd, G. W. (2013). Teachers' victimization-related beliefs and strategies. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology. 41. 1-16
Veenstra, R., Lindenberg, S., Huitsing, G., Sainio, M., & Salmivalli, C. (2014). The Role of Teachers in Bullying. Journal of Educational Psychology. 106(4), 1135-1143.
Weiß, S., Schramm, S., & Kiel, E. (2014). Was sollen Lehrerinnen und Lehrer können? Anforderungen an den Lehrer/innen beruf aus Sicht von Lehrkräften und Ausbildungspersonen, Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung, 15(3). 1-29.
Wright, L. F. (2005). Teacher desirability for professional development specific to bullying intervention and prevention, university of Virginia, Doctor of Education.
Yoon, J., & Bauman, S. (2014). Teachers; a critical but overlooked component of bullying prevention and intervention, Theory into Practice (29), unpublished document.
- Downloaded
- Viewed
- 0KCI Citations
- 0WOS Citations